Category Archives: Authentic Leadership

Escape from the Planet of the Pudding Brains.

To survive on the Planet of the Pudding Brains, you cannot rely on the environment to provide structure. When your situation is “liquified,” you must become your own source of gravity.

Here is a survival guide designed to keep your feet on the ground while everyone else is drifting into the fog; and when yours does too.

The Universal Condition

Before we look outward, we must look inward: We are all pudding brains at times. It isn’t a unique condition belonging only to “the others”; it is a fundamental part of being human. Under enough stress, exhaustion, or uncertainty, our own thoughts can lose their shape and become gelatinous. Acknowledging our own capacity for “soft logic” is the first step toward reclaiming our solid ground.

When situations at the start of a new term seem to go wrong and spin beyond your control, you cannot rely on the environment to provide structure. You must become your own source of gravity.

The Interstellar Survival Guide

Subject: Maintaining Sanity Amidst Structural Liquefaction

Mission: Transitioning from “Lost in Space” to “Commander of Self.”

1. Elevate Intentionality: Find Your North Star

On a planet where decisions shift like dessert, your greatest tool is a fixed point. When leadership is reactive and chaotic, you must be the opposite.

• The Survival Tactic: Do not let the “pudding” dictate your schedule. Start every morning by defining one non-negotiable objective.

• The Mantra: “The environment is chaotic, but my moves are calculated.” Even if the ship is spinning, you can choose which button to press.

2. Combat Complacency: Resist the Quicksand

Pudding-brain leadership is contagious; it’s easy to stop trying when it feels like nothing matters. Complacency is the “atmospheric pressure” of this planet that tries to flatten your ambition.

• The Survival Tactic: Audit your “auto-pilot” moments. If you find yourself saying “it doesn’t matter anyway,” you are sinking. Set a “micro-standard” for excellence that is independent of leadership’s approval.

• The Mantra: “I work for my own standards, not for their chaos.”

3. Champion Growth: Terraform Your Own Space

If the new term feels like a setback, view it instead as a “stress test” for your skills. In sci-fi, the best protagonists grow the most when the life-support systems fail.

• The Survival Tactic: Identify one skill you can sharpen specifically because of the current mess (e.g., crisis management, patience, or lateral thinking).

• The Mantra: “I am not just surviving this term; I am using it as fuel for my next evolution.”

4. Inspire Deeper Connections: Form the Resistance

You aren’t the only one looking for solid ground. The best way to survive a “pudding brain” environment is to find the other “solid-brained” people and link up.

• The Survival Tactic: Move past surface-level venting. Ask your colleagues: “How are you actually holding up, and how can we support each other’s goals?” Authentic vulnerability creates a “gravity well” that keeps you all from drifting away.

• The Mantra: “Connection is our oxygen; we breathe better when we stay linked.”

The Survival Manifesto

• When facing Ambiguity:

Instead of falling into the pudding brain trap of drifting without purpose, choose to Elevate Intentionality. Define your own direction when the map is missing.

• When facing Stagnation:

Instead of falling into the pudding brain trap of checking out or giving up, choose to Combat Complacency. Hold yourself to your own high standards, regardless of the surrounding slump.

• When facing Chaos:

Instead of falling into the pudding brain trap of blaming the environment, choose to Champion Growth. Use the friction of the situation to sharpen your skills and evolve.

• When facing Isolation:

Instead of falling into the pudding brain trap of “every person for themselves,” choose to Inspire Deeper Connections. Build a community of “solid-brained” peers to sustain each other.

Note from Command: On the Planet of the Pudding Brains, the goal isn’t just to wait for the term to end. The goal is to remain “solid” in a world that has gone soft.

Here’s to a better second week.

Tagged , , , ,

Where is the Love? The Moral Imperative in Educational Leadership

My favourite inquiry, “Where is the love?”, functions as a crucial cultural constant for any educational institution. This question moves beyond abstract definitions of vision and values to challenge leaders, educators, and subject specialists concerning the demonstrable, everyday expression of their core professional purpose. It seeks to ascertain how the profound dedication which drew professionals into education—specifically, the devotion to one’s academic discipline and the conviction regarding the empowerment of others—can be maintained visibly, systemically, and with resilience against the pressures of accountability and institutional change.

Given the forthcoming conclusion of the calendar year, the current juncture offers a significant opportunity for professional recalibration. This period traditionally encourages reflection, renewal, and the strengthening of community cohesion. Professionally, this orientation mirrors the precise requirements of effective educational governance: engaging in honest scrutiny of the inherent complexity of change, systematically enhancing both personal and collective capacity, and solidifying the relational bonds fundamental to the operation of educational institutions. The fundamental driver of institutional action, the moral purpose—the “love” that is sought—is the essential component that sustains the demanding trajectory of the academic cycle.

1. The Love for Subject: Transition from Content Delivery to Moral Purpose

The pedagogical foundation rests upon the teacher’s subject specialism. This professional attribute extends beyond mere academic competence; it constitutes the catalyst for the foundational rationale—the compelling imperative that drives professional engagement with curriculum design and methodological adoption. Absent this essential emotional connection, pedagogical activity risks becoming procedural, thereby reducing the curriculum to a perfunctory checklist of required topics.

Articulation and Coherence

A primary function of educational leadership involves assisting colleagues in elevating their practice from simple content delivery to the clear articulation of their moral purpose. This necessitates the establishment of a direct link between the intrinsic merit and utility of their academic discipline (be it the analytical rigour of Mathematics, the creative expression of Art, or the socio-historical context provided by History) and the demonstrable enhancement of pupil outcomes, cultural capital, and subsequent life opportunities. When a leader successfully aligns a teacher’s scholarly passion with this broader objective, a powerful and sustainable internal motivator is generated.

Within an environment governed by the new regulatory expectations of the Ofsted framework, which critically prioritises Curriculum Design and Implementation, the “love for subject” must translate into clear, high-quality coherence making. The professional commitment to enabling every pupil to access and thrive within that discipline is demonstrated by the clarity of the curriculum structure—specifically, what is taught, the rationale for its inclusion, and the methodology of its assessment. This structural clarity, spanning from Key Stage 3 sequencing through to Key Stage 5 mastery, represents the professional expression of institutional care. Compliance with the new statutory Relationships, Sex and Health Education (RSHE) guidance, for example, demands that leaders integrate sensitive material not as a matter of obligatory compliance, but as a genuine expansion of the curriculum’s commitment to pupil welfare and personal growth, equipping them with vital knowledge for adulthood. Consequently, the subject leader’s profound commitment must be evident in strategic, long-term planning, rather than being confined merely to the delivery of individual lessons.

2. The Love for People: Capacity Building, Recognition, and Empowerment

The second component of “love” is directed externally: towards the systematic empowerment of pupils and professional colleagues. This objective directly mandates the cultivation of a Culture of Collaboration and Shared Leadership, a framework which successfully elevates collective efficacy above individualistic endeavour. This communal strength assumes heightened significance during the demanding winter academic term.

Capacity Building and Recognition as Investment

The demonstration of regard for colleagues is synonymous with robust investment in their Capacity Building. In the context of substantial policy shifts—such as the new statutory linkage between Attendance and Safeguarding (as reinforced by KCSIE 2025 updates) or the heightened focus upon online risks such as disinformation and radicalisation—professional competence assumes an ethical dimension. A practitioner lacking the requisite preparation to address a complex safeguarding concern or to implement demanding sections of the statutory RSHE curriculum may find their professional motivation significantly undermined by the fear of procedural failure.

  • Love is Robust CPD: Authentic professional development does not constitute a superficial, isolated event. It aligns with the ‘Changing’ Stage in models of transformation, necessitating the sustained support, coaching, and resources required for educators to master new skills and embed new practices effectively. For leadership, this commitment is demonstrated by ensuring that training provision is comprehensive, appropriately differentiated by career stage and need, and focused specifically on practical implementation (the ‘how’), rather than merely initial theoretical awareness (the ‘what’). This provision must encompass protected time for collaborative planning and subject-specific peer review, thereby facilitating the sharing of expertise and the refinement of practice within a professionally secure environment.
  • Love is Praise: An integral facet of capacity building involves genuine praise and targeted recognition. This extends beyond generic commendation; it constitutes specific, constructive feedback that acknowledges the effort expended and the process of improvement, particularly when staff have successfully navigated the inherent complexity of a change initiative. By celebrating iterative professional progression—such as a successful curriculum modification, the judicious management of a pastoral challenge, or transparent communication delivered professionally—leaders affirm that they observe, value, and trust the professional judgement of their personnel. This focused recognition effectively fuels subsequent commitment.
  • Love is Transparency: When navigating the complex financial landscape—where the funding increase often obscures the challenge posed by grant consolidation into the core budget—Continuous and Transparent Communication is paramount. It represents a proactive act of trust that mitigates anxiety and counters unsubstantiated internal conjecture. Leaders must address staff concerns regarding resources and budget allocation in a forward-looking manner, thereby managing expectations and sustaining engagement despite the uncertainty inherent in the “messiness” of change. This requires communicating why specific budgetary decisions are executed and how they align demonstrably with the shared moral purpose, thereby ensuring personnel do not perceive decisions as arbitrary or concealed.

The Empowerment of Shared Responsibility

Shared leadership, which cultivates a collective sense of responsibility for both improvement and innovation, stands as the paramount expression of professional regard for colleagues. It acknowledges that expertise and problem-solving capabilities are distributed throughout departments and faculties, rather than being concentrated solely within the senior leadership echelon.

  • Love is Empowerment: Empowerment serves as the practical manifestation of institutional trust. It mandates the distribution of ownership for key improvement priorities, thereby granting subject leaders and teachers’ agency within their professional domain and affording them the voice required to influence strategic decision-making. This contrasts fundamentally with a management structure that merely delegates tasks. When a leader empowers a faculty head to pilot a novel pedagogical approach, they are unequivocally demonstrating faith in that individual’s professional acumen and their profound commitment to driving effective, distributed improvement across the entire organisation. This model supports a culture where initiative is rewarded and where professional setbacks are accurately reclassified as learning opportunities, thereby securing the systemic resilience of the institution.

3. The Love for the Journey: Commitment, Resilience, and the Relentless Cycle

The professional scope of the school leader, symbolically represented by the cyclical, demanding progression of Jacob’s Ladder, ( see Authentic Leader passim) necessitates the consistent demonstration of unreserved Commitment and Strategic Adaptability. The “love for the journey” is the resolute determination to maintain the trajectory, even when challenges appear daunting, and understanding that progress is often attained incrementally.

Commitment and Professional Integrity

Commitment functions as the internal driver of professional integrity. It represents the unwavering determination to honour the school’s moral purpose, particularly when external pressures threaten to divert critical resources or managerial attention.

  • Love is Sustained Commitment: Leaders demonstrate this commitment through their own sustained adherence to the strategic vision, ensuring that every policy decision and financial manoeuvre serves the central objective of pupil success. This involves managing the “descent”—the necessary engagement with complex compliance and financial realities (such as the detailed application of the new National Funding Formula (NFF) parameters, the management of Minimum Funding Guarantee (MFG) complexities, or the meticulous tracking required to avoid financial deductions)—without ever losing sight of the “ascent”—the moral purpose of upholding educational standards and fostering well-being. The resilient leader does not permit the technicalities of the descent to overshadow the human and educational imperative of the ascent.

The planned transition to a new, multi-dimensional Ofsted “report card” system exemplifies this resilience. By moving away from a high-stakes, single-word judgement, the framework actively encourages leaders to adopt a more nuanced, iterative approach to improvement. It requires the professional courage to undertake honest evaluation across potentially eleven areas and to continuously adjust strategy based upon rich, contextualised data, rather than being immobilised by the apprehension of a singular negative classification. This commitment to continuous, honest self-evaluation constitutes a fundamental expression of leadership integrity.

Iteration as Professional Integrity

To demonstrate adaptability and resilience is to formally acknowledge that change is frequently non-linear, as evidenced by the unforeseen variables encountered in practical change management models. The “love for the journey” necessitates the embrace of iteration: a willingness to derive lessons from experience, adjust strategies dynamically, and avoid rigid adherence to an initial plan when confronted by unexpected obstacles or policy fluctuations. This flexible, forward-thinking approach ensures that the primary focus remains fixed on the desired outcome—enhanced pupil attainment and professional flourishing—rather than on the institutional comfort of maintaining the status quo. Iteration, in this specific context, is the ongoing demonstration of professional integrity, confirming that the most effective leaders are those perpetually willing to refine their methodology based on real-world feedback and empirical data.

The Christmas Parallel: Reflection, Renewal, and Reaffirmation

The Christmas period represents a welcome procedural break, a communal occasion for rest and institutional re-centring. This recess should be conceptualised not merely as a pause, but as a defined moment to consciously exercise the Love for the Journey and the Love for People.

  • Reflection (The Descent): Parallel to personal reflection upon the preceding year, this is the designated time for professional leaders to undertake genuine, unpressured consideration of the process of change, extending beyond simple outcomes. Which unforeseen variables presented the greatest challenge? In which areas did collective capacity prove most susceptible to strain?
  • Renewal (Capacity Building): The essential benefit of the holiday period is the renewal of personal reserves—mental, emotional, and physical. Leaders who demonstrate regard for their staff ensure that this period is genuinely restorative, thereby cultivating the refreshed professional purpose necessary for navigating the challenges inherent in the spring term. This renewal constitutes the ultimate practice of professional sustainability and self-care.
  • Reaffirmation (Moral Purpose): Finally, the seasonal focus on goodwill and community provides an unparalleled opportunity for the formal reaffirmation of the moral purpose guiding the institution. It is a chance to articulate institutional gratitude and communicate the term’s successes, irrespective of their scale, reinforcing the communal bonds and reminding every colleague—from the newest practitioner to the most senior leader—of the profound significance of their sustained professional dedication.

Reflective Planning Framework for Aspiring Leaders

Integrating Professional Commitment and Ethos

This framework offers aspiring leaders a structured tool for personal and professional development, focusing on the active application of the moral imperative—the “love” in leadership—across four critical domains. It is designed to bridge the gap between aspirational ethos and demonstrable professional behaviour.

Leadership DomainDefinition & Link to “The Love”Reflection Questions (Current Practice)Development Action (Moving Forward)
1. Elevate IntentionalityRelates to: The Love for Subject (Moral Purpose and Coherence). Intentionality ensures that every action, decision, and communication directly serves the articulated moral purpose, preventing professional activity from becoming merely procedural compliance. It is the commitment to Clarity and Strategic Planning.How often are strategic decisions (e.g., resource allocation, timetable adjustments) explicitly linked back to the core moral purpose or the strategic vision? In my current role, how effectively do I communicate the rationale behind a change initiative, rather than simply the instruction for its implementation?A. Develop a “Purpose-Driven Decision Protocol”: Before initiating any project, formally document the anticipated impact on pupil outcomes and staff capacity.

B. Practice “Visible Thinking”: In meetings, articulate the ‘Why’ before the ‘What’ to demonstrate purposeful leadership and subject coherence.
2. Combat ComplacencyRelates to: The Love for the Journey (Resilience and Iteration). Complacency is the antithesis of professional integrity. Combatting it requires embracing the “messiness” of change, seeking continuous feedback, and maintaining the intellectual honesty needed for self-evaluation.In which areas of my current responsibility have I resisted feedback, or where is practice maintained purely because “that is how it has always been done”? How frequently do I solicit critical feedback on my own leadership style and decision-making process (managing the “descent”)?A. Implement a 360-Degree Feedback Cycle specifically on “Adaptability to Change” and “Transparency of Communication.”

B. Dedicate 30 minutes weekly to review a failed or challenging professional episode, documenting the lessons learned and identifying the necessary strategic iteration.
3. Champion GrowthRelates to: The Love for People (Capacity Building and Empowerment). Championing growth moves beyond providing mandatory training (CPD) to actively seeking out and facilitating opportunities for colleagues to develop agency and expand their professional scope.Who, beyond my immediate team, have I proactively identified and mentored to take on new responsibilities (Empowerment)? How specific and constructive is the Praise and Recognition I provide? Is it tied to observed professional growth or merely to final successful outcomes?A. Institute a “Distributed Leadership Project”: Identify one colleague per term to lead a minor improvement project entirely autonomously, providing resources but not micro-managing.

B. Adopt “Evidence-Based Recognition”: Ensure all commendations explicitly reference the effort, skill acquisition, or specific behavioural change demonstrated, thereby reinforcing the value of the growth process.
4. Inspire Deeper ConnectionsRelates to: The Love for People (Shared Leadership and Transparency). This domain focuses on building the social and relational capital necessary for collective efficacy and institutional resilience, particularly through open, trusting communication.When addressing complexity (e.g., budget constraints or high-stakes accountability), do I foster anxiety or confidence? How well do I utilise formal and informal opportunities to communicate gratitude and reinforce the value of shared purpose (Reaffirmation)?A. Develop a “Communication Charter”: Commit to communicating critical strategic updates proactively, even when full details are unavailable, to sustain Transparency and mitigate conjecture.

B. Lead a “Moral Purpose Dialogue” session within the team in the new year, requiring all members to articulate how their individual passion contributes to the collective mission.

The successful transition to senior leadership is not predicated solely on technical competence, but upon the demonstrable and consistent application of the moral purpose. By intentionally working to Elevate Intentionality, Combat Complacency, Champion Growth, and Inspire Deeper Connections, aspiring leaders actively embody the professional love that is essential for navigating complexity and ensuring the enduring health and efficacy of the educational institution.

So, before the many mince pies, carols sang off key and the usual end of the term shenanigans, this is me signing off until 2026. Thank you for reading, commenting, liking and suggesting – via blog, message or in person. It is all appreciated. And so are you. May your Christmas dreams come true.

Tagged , , ,

The Authentic Leader’s Playbook: Learning from The Devil in the Details

If you were to hire a consultant to design the perfect villain for humanity, they would eventually invent Satan. His journey from a minor celestial bureaucrat to the Prince of Darkness is history’s most successful case study in what Steven Pinker calls “Common Knowledge.”

Pinker argues that social coordination requires a recursive state of awareness: I know X, you know X, and we both know that the other knows X. This public certainty is the “lubricant” for collective action. By viewing the history of Satan through this lens, we can extract profound and practical lessons on influence, communication, and the mechanics of social organisation that are essential for any authentic leader.

I. Strategic Lessons for the Authentic Leader

The evolution of the Devil is a masterclass in how to manage narrative, drive coordination, and ethically frame challenges. An authentic leader should apply these four principles:

1. Differentiate Shared Knowledge from Common Knowledge

The distinction between the Devil’s original version (ha-Satan) and his iconic rebrand (Lucifer) is Pinker’s critical lever.

• Shared Knowledge (Private Belief): Everyone knows the organisational values (they read the memo), but they do not know if their peers actually buy in. This leads to private scepticism and low engagement.

• Common Knowledge (Public Certainty): The leader must create situations where “everyone knows that everyone knows” the values and goals are real and non-negotiable. This is achieved through public signals (visible recognition, transparent decision-making, and consistent enforcement), which creates the binding awareness necessary for collective, coordinated action.

2. Frame Your Narrative Simply

The original ha-Satan was too nuanced—a cosmic judge and jury in the cupboard. This is the risk of an overly complex, internal-facing mission statement.

• Simplicity Scales: The successful Lucifer was simple: Prideful Rebel = Source of All Evil. Authentic leaders must distil their complex vision into a clear, concrete, and sticky message that can be effortlessly repeated and understood across all levels of the organisation. An authentic leader’s personal values are only as powerful as the shared, simple story the team tells about them.

3. Ethically Externalise the “Enemy”

The Devil’s success was as an externalised scapegoat that unified humanity. A leader must engage with the ethics of this strategy.

• Unify Against Problems, Not People: The leader’s equivalent of “Satan” should not be an internal department, a rival team member, or even a competitor. It must be an abstract, concrete, and shared problem—things like inefficiency, market stagnation, or lack of innovation. By unifying the team against a specific, externalised process or problem, the leader provides a powerful rallying point that fosters internal cohesion and reduces the risk of destructive in-fighting.

4. Understand the Endurance of Symbols

The modern use of Satan by non-theistic groups demonstrates the durability of a powerful symbol, even when the original belief is gone.

• Symbols Outlive Facts: The authentic leader must recognise that their actions, symbols, and core principles will resonate long after they are gone. A genuine commitment to principles like rebellion against arbitrary authority (the Miltonian Lucifer) can be leveraged by future generations. Authenticity—the consistent alignment of stated values and public actions—is the only way to ensure the legacy of the symbol remains positive.

II. The Core Mechanism: From Bureaucrat to Brand

To understand these lessons, we must first look at the theological necessity that drove the Devil’s rebranding.

The Bureaucrat vs. The Brand: The Existential Rebranding

In the Hebrew Bible, the entity known as ha-Satan (the Bureaucrat) was too nuanced to spark a mass movement. In Pinker’s terms, this version of Satan created “Shared Knowledge” (people privately knew suffering existed) but failed to establish “Common Knowledge.”

This created an Existential Problem for the emerging Christian Monotheism: If God is all-powerful and all-good, and ha-Satan is his employee, then God is directly responsible for all evil and testing. This is difficult to market to a population facing famine and plague. The Church needed an escape clause for divine responsibility.

The Great Rebranding: A Cognitive Cascade

The solution was the transition to Lucifer, the Fallen Angel. The Hebrew helel (shining one)—a poetic jab at the pompous King of Babylon in Isaiah 14:12—was translated into the Latin Lucifer. This “cosmic typo” became the spark.

This narrative was sticky. It moved the concept of evil from the abstract (a philosophical problem) to the concrete (a specific guy named Lucifer who hates you). This created the necessary Common Knowledge for a dualistic worldview: everyone knew that everyone else knew that the Devil was real and the sole source of temptation, suffering, and disorder. This externalisation preserved God’s goodness while providing a tangible enemy.

III. The Cognitive Lever of Hell: Standardising the Enemy

With the “Lucifer” archetype established, the machinery of Common Knowledge kicked into high gear during the Middle Ages.

• Visual Lexicon: By standardising the image of Satan—horns, hooves, eternal fire, often borrowing from pagan gods—the Church created a universal signal. This visual language, reinforced across cathedral art and morality plays, meant a peasant in France saw the same monster as a theologian in Rome.

• Aural Enforcement: Public rituals like the Exorcism Rite and the Sermon transformed private fear (Shared Knowledge) into public, undeniable fact (Common Knowledge).

This shared certainty coordinated social behaviour with terrifying efficiency. The use of the Devil as a scapegoat provided the “plausible deniability” Pinker describes, but it also became a Common Knowledge multiplier: the accusation that a rival was “in league with the Devil” was instantly plausible because everyone knew that everyone knew the Devil was actively seeking agents. This justified and accelerated witch trials and inquisitions, turning a theological concept into a machine for social compliance and political purges.

The Devil, it turns out, is in the recursive details. We built a hell of our own design, not necessarily out of fire and brimstone, but out of the powerful, binding belief that everyone else sees the same monster we do.

For the authentic leader, the ultimate takeaway is that effective influence is not just about sharing a vision; it is about creating a self-reinforcing, public reality where the team’s goals, and the problems standing in their way, are the unquestioned Common Knowledge.

Tagged , , ,

The Authentic School Leader’s Communication Conundrum: “Shaka, When the Walls Fell”

The modern school leader’s kryptonite isn’t budget strategy or curriculum mapping—it’s the calendar. Specifically, knowing when to hit “Send” and when to call an “All-Staff Meeting.” For authentic leaders, this is less about simple task management and more about an act of curation—an intentional choice rooted in respect, transparency, and intentionality. The authentic leader understands that every communication channel choice sends a message about how they value their team’s time and talent.

The core challenge is this: how do you foster the kind of deep, exceptional connection that emerges in synchronous conversation, while ruthlessly protecting the finite attention of your team from unnecessary interruptions? The answer lies in understanding the decoded metaphor of the leader’s door.

Tangent Alley

Arguments about what is the best Star Trek episode can get heated and go on late into the night – I should know, I’ve been there. Moreover, I can be easily swayed. “The City on the Edge of Forever?” “The Inner Light?” “Mirror Mirror?” “Yesterday’s Enterprise?” Yes, yes, yes! They’re all the best episode. But when it comes time to discuss what is the most profound episode, I think I have a clear pick.

Darmok,” from The Next Generation‘s fifth season, edges out some of the competition (like TOS’ fiercely pacifist “Day of the Dove” or “A Taste of Armageddon”) with its odd specificity. In other words, a message about the futility of war isn’t something you’ll only get from Trek. But “Darmok”’s story about a group or an individual so determined to communicate with others that they are willing to sacrifice themselves to make that contact – that’s something more unusual, even if it isn’t any less universal.

“Darmok,” of course, is the episode where a Tamarian (also known as the Children of Tama) named Dathon realises that great risks must be taken if his people are ever going to reach outside their own clan. Because of their unique fashion of speech which used metaphoric descriptions based on their own mythology, the universal translator is unable to make the usual connections. We’ll eventually realize that “Shaka, when the walls fell” means “failure,” but with no reference to Shaka (or his wall-falling misfortune) the UT program is unable to do so.

 It is a metaphor, referencing a story from the Tamarian culture where a hero named Shaka fails to save his people from a disaster. The phrase is used to express a situation of disappointment, defeat, or a complete breakdown. 

Same as it ever was. Disappointing communication is key; deciding what is actually important, almost impossible at times, and coaching those around us into understanding this is sometimes the hardest road we travel as leaders.

I often recognise that there is a vital difference between an email and a meeting. So, here, I make an attempt to define and explain both, although, if you are short on time, a meeting should have biscuits.

I. The Cost of Synchronicity: Respect for Time

Authentic leaders recognise that a colleague’s attention is the single most valuable, finite asset they control. Wasting it is a breach of trust. This dictates the core difference between the choices:

The Email Choice (Low Cost: Information Ledger)

  • Purpose: Information transmission, formal decisions, final agreements, or critical instructions. Email is the foundation of institutional memory and operational compliance.
  • Value: It demonstrates profound respect for individual productivity, allowing staff to absorb information asynchronously—when it fits their deep-focus work. Crucially, it creates a permanent, searchable ledger that prevents future confusion or “misremembering” and underpins accountability.
  • The School Leader’s Dilemma (The Failure): Despite its utility for clarity, the email choice can often be bypassed or ignored by overwhelmed staff, leading to compliance risks or, in the micro-sense, staff hearing vital information second-hand—like OFSTED changes on Radio 2—or the embarrassing question, “Could I remind them of an email I sent two days ago, because they had forgotten?” It’s a failure of information absorption and procedural compliance, a tragedy where clarity and accountability are missed: “Shaka, when the walls fell” (signifying failure or great defeat). The lesson here is that effective leadership requires both sending and ensuring the receipt and retention of critical information.

The Meeting Choice (High Cost, High Value: Collective Cognition)

  • Purpose: When simultaneous, immediate, and iterative input is required. Calling a meeting is an implicit contract: the value gained from synchronous discussion must outweigh the cost of everyone’s time. It’s essential for high-value tasks like brainstorming, rapid ideation, or complex problem-solving where non-linear discussion is beneficial.
  • The School Leader’s Value (The Triumph): As experienced in the last two weeks—13 meetings about KS3 data and Y11 mock results that could not have been an email—the synchronous discussion fosters shared ownership and reveals the outstanding, unique, or exceptional qualities of a colleague. The real value is the serendipity of spontaneous contribution; the quick, essential debate that occurs in the moment and moves the entire group forward in ways a static email thread never could.

II. Trust, Tone, and the Non-Verbal Code

When the subject is sensitive, potentially emotional, or nuanced—like strategic shifts, conflict resolution, or delivering bad news—email is a terrible vessel for tone. It strips away context, allowing the reader’s mood to dictate interpretation. A face-to-face setting allows a leader to convey empathy, read non-verbal cues (the slumped shoulder, the furrowed brow), and ensure the message is received authentically—not misinterpreted through cold text.

This is where the Tamarian idioms perfectly explain the decoded metaphor of the school leader’s door, which is often a portal to either genuine collaboration or tragic distraction:

The choice of communication channel aligns directly with the value being sought:

  1. The Official Invite (Meeting) signifies a High-Value, High-Cost conversation. This is the forum for genuine input, immediate feedback, and emotional nuance—a requirement for collective problem-solving where a joint effort overcomes an obstacle. The successful execution of such a meeting is captured by the idiom “Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra,” meaning Cooperation through a shared challenge. These intentional conversations are the source of shared stories, building the relational capital required for true connection and future trust.
  2. The Pop-in (Unintentional Asynchronicity) represents a Low-Value Interruption and is the unfortunate symptom of a lack of process or the failure to utilize the low-cost, documenting power of email for clear communication. It forces an interruption for information that should have been self-serve, ultimately showing a lack of operational discipline and respect for the leader’s focused time. The result is the tragedy of missed information and collapsed attention: “Shaka, when the walls fell,” signifying Failure, tragedy, or great defeat. This is the moment a system—or an individual’s attention—is confirmed to have collapsed due to preventable miscommunication.

For authentic school leaders, the choice isn’t transactional; it’s an act of curation of both attention and culture. By intentionally choosing the right channel, the leader moves beyond simply communicating to actively enabling their team to work together effectively, with mutual respect, and focused on tasks that truly matter.

Tagged , , , , ,

Party Fears Two: The UK’s Crisis of Connection

There was always going to be a point where the dual blogs would find a beautiful intersection. This is a piece that started for ‘The Authentic Leader’, and then changed. Initially published on ‘The Centre Cannot Hold’, I offer it to a different audience here.

You can find https://thecentrecannothold1.wordpress.com/ here.

In 2025, the United Kingdom is grappling with a profound and multifaceted sense of alienation, a feeling of being disconnected from one’s community, institutions, and even one’s own potential. This disassociation is not a singular phenomenon but rather a tangled web of socio-economic and political forces that manifest across three seemingly distinct domains: the classroom, the concert hall, and the political arena. By examining the education crisis, the artistic legacy of Billy Mackenzie, and the weaponisation of misinformation in political debate, a clear picture emerges of a nation grappling with a collective sense of profound disconnection.

An Analysis of the Interplay between Parental Engagement, Student Conduct, and Socioeconomic Disadvantage in the UK Education System

The UK’s education system is currently facing a significant challenge characterized by a reported behaviour and attendance crisis. This issue has moved to the forefront of political and public discourse, with government officials, including the Education Secretary, calling for a united effort involving parents, carers, and schools to get children, “at their desks and ready to learn”. While the government’s “Plan for Change” and other policy initiatives are framed as a direct response to this perceived crisis, this report deconstructs the complex and often misunderstood relationship between parental involvement, student behaviour, and social class in the UK. It moves beyond a simplistic narrative of individual responsibility to examine the deep-seated, structural factors that shape these dynamics.

The public narrative places the onus on schools and parents, yet it conveniently overlooks the systemic barriers that prevent genuine parental engagement. For many disadvantaged families, the psychological, financial, and time constraints of poverty create a profound disconnect from the school system. Parents with inflexible jobs or who are themselves products of a difficult school experience often feel like outsiders, unable to navigate the “daunting” institutional environment. This sense of alienation from the education system is then passed down to their children, who, as a result, are nearly six times more likely to be excluded. The consequence is a cycle of academic failure and social exclusion, where a child’s background becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy of being left behind. In this sense, the classroom is not a place of connection and opportunity, but a field of systemic disengagement, mirroring broader societal inequalities.

This sense of disassociation and being fundamentally misunderstood is powerfully reflected in the tragic life and art of Billy Mackenzie. His hit song, “Party Fears Two,” is a masterful exploration of feeling like an imposter, a feeling of being in a room where one does not belong. The song’s beautiful, commercially successful veneer belied a deep personal struggle with anxiety and a profound aversion to the very fame it brought him. Mackenzie’s self-destructive refusal to embrace a world tour was the ultimate act of alienation—a conscious choice to reject the very system he had successfully infiltrated. His story serves as a poignant artistic mirror to a wider, national sentiment of being an outsider. In a society that often promises success and inclusion through conformity, his is a powerful example of the deep psychological cost of pretending to fit in, and the alienation that can result when one’s inner reality clashes with their public persona.

“The party fears are going to get you” From an early age, Billy Mackenzie was an outsider. Growing up in Dundee, his flamboyant style and unique vocal talent made him stand out but also made him a target. He was a flamboyant artist in a city known for its industrial grit. The “party fears” in his lyrics were not just abstract anxieties; they were a direct reflection of a deep-seated fear of social conformity and an intuitive understanding that true individuality would always be at odds with the mainstream. His artistic process itself was an act of alienation—he often worked in a hermetically sealed creative bubble, eschewing commercial advice and producing music on his own terms. This deliberate creative isolation was a protective measure, a way of ensuring his artistic vision was never compromised by the very “wolves” he would later sing about.

“I’ll buy you a drink, and then I’ll leave you for the wolves” This lyric captures the paradox of Mackenzie’s relationship with the music industry and fame. The drink is the temporary comfort of success, the brief moment of commercial validation. However, the “wolves” represent the insatiable demands of the industry—the relentless touring, the invasive media, and the pressure to conform to a pre-packaged public persona. For Mackenzie, this was a form of psychological predation that he couldn’t bear. His refusal to tour the United States after the success of “Party Fears Two” was not an act of professional incompetence but a radical statement of self-preservation, a rejection of the very system that had granted him a taste of success. He preferred to be an outsider rather than be consumed by a world that felt fundamentally inauthentic.

“I am not the one who knows you” This final line is perhaps the most devastatingly honest. It speaks to the ultimate alienation—the disconnect from oneself that comes from living an inauthentic life. It’s the moment of recognition that the person you present to the world is not who you are, a feeling of being a stranger to your own identity. For Mackenzie, who wrestled with depression and anxiety throughout his life, this lyric captures the tragic essence of his story. His art gave him a platform to be seen, but he felt unseen and unknown by the very people who celebrated him. His life, and his tragic death, is a powerful reminder that while we can connect through art, we still must do the work of connecting with each other and with ourselves to combat the corrosive effects of alienation.

Political discourse in the UK has become a primary engine of collective alienation. Political figures like Nigel Farage, through the cynical weaponisation of misinformation, actively work to sever citizens’ trust in their own institutions. By taking complex legal and political events and reframing them as personal betrayals by a faceless elite, they alienate citizens from the very systems designed to serve them. This tactic creates an environment where patriotism is no longer about a shared love of country, but a tribal loyalty test based on a hatred of “the other.” The result is a toxic form of political alienation where facts are irrelevant, institutions are illegitimate, and civil discourse is impossible. In this environment, citizens are forced to retreat from public life, further isolating themselves and losing faith in the very concept of a shared national identity.

Weaponisation of Legal Cases The cynical use of legal and political events is a key component of this alienation. A figure like Nigel Farage, for example, can seize upon a ruling from the European Court of Human Rights on the Rwanda policy. He can then deliberately misrepresent the details, framing the court as an unaccountable foreign power actively working against the British people. This is a deliberate and repeated manipulation that takes a grain of legitimate concern, wraps it in false claims, and points the finger at a convenient scapegoat. His past actions, like the £350 million bus claim for the NHS or the misinformation about EU army conscription, follow the same pattern. It is a calculated strategy to sow distrust and make people feel that their country is under siege by unseen and malicious forces.

Patriotism as Performance, Not Principle What makes this tactic particularly insidious is how it’s wrapped in a veneer of patriotism. This performative brand of nationalism is a weapon of choice for many authoritarian populists. It repackages complex policy questions as tribal loyalty tests, insisting that being patriotic means believing a politician’s lies. In this distorted view, respecting facts and the rule of law is reframed as an elite betrayal. The irony is that this manufactured narrative of betrayal is the real betrayal. When political leaders spread false information about the very institutions that protect our rights, they are attacking the foundations of democratic governance. They are teaching people to distrust the systems designed to serve them, turning patriotism from a love of country into a hatred of one’s neighbours’.

This is a mindset that manifests in tangible, public ways, perhaps most visibly in the proliferation of St. George’s flags. What was once a symbol of national pride during international sporting events is now being co-opted and stripped of its context, painted on roundabouts, or hung from windows, often in a way that feels more like a territorial marker than a unifying emblem. Similarly, The Associates’ defiant cover of David Bowie’s “Boys Keep Swinging” serves as a powerful artistic counterpoint to this. Bowie’s original was a joyful, flamboyant embrace of queer identity and self-expression. The Associates, led by the equally theatrical Billy Mackenzie, re-interpreted the song with a stark, unsettling beauty. The cover wasn’t just a tribute; it was a reassertion of the very individuality that the new, jingoistic patriotism seeks to erase. It stands in direct opposition to the simplistic, one-dimensional identity of flags on roundabouts, reminding us that true British culture is complex, rebellious, and deeply personal, not a flag to be waved in tribal displays of feigned unity.

Ultimately, the UK in 2025 is defined by a crisis of connection. From the classroom where children are left behind, to the world of art where success leads to retreat, and to the political sphere where citizens are deliberately pitted against one another, a deep sense of alienation permeates modern British life. The education crisis reveals a socio-economic alienation, the story of Billy Mackenzie highlights a psychological and artistic alienation, and the state of political discourse exposes a civic alienation. Recognizing these interconnected forms is the first step toward addressing the profound sense of disconnection that threatens to pull the nation apart.

A Checklist for a More Connected UK in 2026

As we move into 2026, here is a checklist of actionable steps that society can take to make things better for all citizens of the UK and combat the crisis of alienation, framed by a new set of guiding principles.

Elevate Intentionality

  • Implement targeted, home-based support programs for disadvantaged parents to help them actively engage in their children’s learning.
  • Prioritise funding for school mental health services to address the underlying causes of behavioural issues and provide support for both students and families.
  • Encourage schools to use clear, jargon-free communication and build stronger, more personal relationships with parents.
  • Advocate for stronger media literacy education in schools to equip citizens with the tools to identify and resist misinformation.

Combat Complacency

  • Invest in community transport and public spaces to combat social and physical isolation, particularly for older citizens and those in rural areas.
  • Support and amplify organisations dedicated to promoting civil and empathetic political discourse, such as Compassion in Politics.
  • Promote local community initiatives that encourage face-to-face interaction and build a sense of shared purpose and identity beyond online echo chambers.

Champion Growth

  • Prioritise funding for school mental health services to address the underlying causes of behavioural issues and provide support for both students and families.
  • Support arts and cultural programs that celebrate diversity and provide platforms for genuine human expression, offering alternatives to the commercialized and isolating aspects of mainstream culture.
  • Encourage intergenerational projects that bring different age groups together to share skills and experiences, fostering a greater sense of connection and mutual understanding.

Create Deeper Connections

  • Encourage schools to build stronger, more personal relationships with parents.
  • Promote local community initiatives that encourage face-to-face interaction and build a sense of shared purpose and identity beyond online echo chambers.
  • Encourage intergenerational projects that bring different age groups together to share skills and experiences, fostering a greater sense of connection and mutual understanding.
Tagged , , ,

Jacob’s Ladder – the climb into 2026.

Foreword: The Path of Jacob’s Ladder

The final weekend of the school holiday is always a time of transition, often packed with the last-minute preparations for the new academic year. To find a moment of calm before the new term’s demands began, my family and I escaped to Wales, where the sea—which we treat as a family friend—offers a sense of peace and perspective. This is me making a concerted effort to be more ‘Lyme Regis’.

Our journey took us to the Devil’s Bridge, just outside Aberystwyth, where we decided to walk the path known as Jacob’s Ladder. Beyond its spiritual meaning, Jacob’s Ladder is also a real place—a famous flight of slate steps at Devil’s Bridge Falls (Pontarfynach). The steps descend into a deep gorge and then climb back up, visually echoing the biblical ladder connecting Earth and heaven. This challenging walk is a key part of a circular nature trail that offers stunning views of the waterfalls and the famous “Three Bridges”.

In ancient scripture, Jacob’s Ladder is a powerful symbol of a direct path between the earthly and the divine, with angels ascending and descending between realms. It’s also a captivating physics experiment where a shimmering electrical arc climbs and re-forms in a relentless, cyclical ascent. Both of these images—the biblical promise and the cyclical physical climb—are fitting symbols for a school leader’s work. The descent into the gorge can be likened to the complex financial pressures and intricate new compliance regulations that must be meticulously managed. The demanding climb back up represents the work of upholding educational standards, fostering pupil well-being, and leading a school community through significant change.

Ultimately, the significance of the name “Jacob’s Ladder” lies in this duality. It is both a spiritual metaphor for a divine connection and a scientific term for a physical phenomenon that, by a remarkable visual coincidence, embodies that very same upward motion. This briefing is designed to be your guide for this ascent. It synthesises the critical policy shifts and regulatory updates to provide a clear, actionable roadmap, ensuring you’re equipped not only to meet the challenges of the coming months but to lead your school confidently towards a new, more nuanced vision of success.


Critical Need to Knows

The 2025/26 academic year represents a period of profound transformation for the education sector, driven by a series of interconnected policy shifts in funding, accountability, and statutory guidance. For school leaders, the imperative is to move beyond a reactive stance and adopt a proactive, holistic strategy.

The headline figures for funding increases can be misleading, concealing a more complex financial reality shaped by the consolidation of grants. Similarly, the accountability landscape is being fundamentally reshaped with a new Ofsted inspection framework that moves away from a single, high-stakes judgement to a more nuanced, multi-dimensional assessment.

Simultaneously, updates to statutory safeguarding and curriculum guidance signal a heightened government focus on emerging risks, particularly in the online domain and in relation to pupil attendance.

The most critical points for school leaders to address immediately are:

  • Funding is Tighter Than it Appears: The headline increase in per-pupil funding largely represents the formalisation of previous pay and pension grants, meaning the net injection of new money is modest.
  • Accountability is Being Reshaped: The new Ofsted report card system fundamentally alters how a school’s performance is judged, shifting the focus from a single grade to a multi-faceted evaluation of up to 11 key areas.
  • Safeguarding Remains a Strategic Priority: Updates to statutory guidance, particularly Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE), signal a heightened government focus on emerging risks, including online harms and the critical link between attendance and safeguarding.

Part I: Financial and Strategic Planning

The National Funding Formula (NFF) 2025/26: A Deeper Dive

Per-Pupil Funding & Grant Consolidation

The Department for Education has allocated an additional £2.3 billion to the core schools’ budget for the 2025/26 financial year. This investment translates to an average per-pupil funding increase of 2.23% for mainstream schools. The total Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) schools block for this period is £48.7 billion, with average per-pupil funding projected at £6,466, a 2.15% increase compared to the previous year.

However, a close examination of the NFF reveals that this headline figure is not a measure of new money but rather a restatement and re-packaging of existing funds.  A significant portion of the increase, specifically 1.28%, is allocated to ensure the continuation of funding for the 2024 teachers’ and support staff pay awards. Furthermore, a number of historic grants, including the Teachers’ Pay Additional Grant (TPAG), the Teachers’ Pension Employer Contribution Grant (TPECG), and the Core Schools Budget Grant (CSBG), are being rolled into the NFF.

Minimum Funding Guarantee (MFG) & Funding Floor

The changes to the Minimum Funding Guarantee (MFG) and the funding floor create a complex new reality for budget forecasting. For 2025/26, local authorities have the flexibility to set the MFG between minus 0.5% and 0% per pupil. This represents a shift from the previous year’s range of 0% to 0.5% and could allow some schools to experience a modest per-pupil funding reduction, even as the NFF average increases.

A specific change in the regulations for 2025/26 is the exclusion of funding allocated for split-sites premises and Private Finance Initiative (PFI) premises costs from the MFG calculation. This separates these high-cost, historically based factors from core pupil-led funding protection. It means a school’s PFI costs could change without being covered by the MFG, introducing a new line item for financial risk assessment.

High Needs and Early Years Funding

The high needs budget will see a significant increase of almost £1 billion, bringing the total funding to £11.9 billion for 2025/26. This represents a substantial increase of over 9% compared to the 2024/25 baseline and suggests a strategic response to the growing national crisis in special educational needs and disability (SEND) provision.

For Post-16 education, the national funding rate for students aged 16 and 17 has been increased to £5,105, with other funding bands increased proportionately. A key policy shift is the removal of the “under-delivery tolerance” for T Levels from the 2025/26 academic year. This means that any under-delivery in student recruitment is now subject to financial recovery as part of the T Level reconciliation process. This signals a maturation of the program and moves to hold providers more financially accountable for their recruitment, requiring leaders to improve their enrolment forecasting and management.

The DfE Energy Purchase Scheme

The Department for Education is introducing a new energy purchase scheme under which maintained schools will be able to access the Department’s own energy contract. This scheme helps schools transition to a more stable energy contract sourced via Crown Commercial Service (CCS) and is designed to protect them from market volatility and reduce procurement risks.

A new regulation (Regulation 23) has been introduced that creates a direct, punitive mechanism for financial compliance. It provides local authorities with the power to deduct money from a school’s budget share where an undisputed energy invoice has not been paid. School leaders must therefore implement robust internal financial controls and invoice management systems to avoid this deduction, as it could bypass normal budget allocation processes and impact their ability to spend on other priorities.


Compliance, Curriculum, and Safeguarding

New Statutory Guidance: The Pillars of Safeguarding

Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) 2025

The new Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) 2025 guidance was published in an “information-only” version in July 2025, with the final statutory version set to come into force on September 1, 2025. A fundamental change is that the Department for Education’s

Working together to improve school attendance guidance is now statutory. This elevates attendance from a key performance metric to a core safeguarding responsibility. The guidance explicitly states that being absent, as well as missing, from education can be a warning sign of a range of safeguarding concerns, including sexual or criminal exploitation.

The guidance also updates the list of online safety risks, adding disinformation, misinformation, and conspiracy theories as emerging threats that require a more sophisticated approach to curriculum and staff training.

Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) Statutory Framework

A new version of the EYFS statutory framework will also come into force on September 1, 2025. Non-compliance with the new regulations is classified as a criminal offence, which can result in a fine. This criminal penalty elevates the importance of these changes beyond typical policy updates, signalling a no-tolerance approach to safeguarding failures in early years settings.

Curriculum & Policy Updates

Relationships, Sex and Health Education (RSHE) Guidance

New statutory guidance for Relationships Education, Relationships and Sex Education (RSE), and Health Education was published in July 2025 but will not formally come into force until September 1, 2026. This one-year implementation window presents a strategic opportunity for proactive leaders to prepare for the changes. The new guidance is designed to address growing online risks, including misogynistic attitudes and harmful views about relationships.

Broader Policy and Workforce Changes

The education landscape is also set to be influenced by broader policy shifts. New guidance states that all new teachers will be required to hold, or be working towards, Qualified Teacher Status (QTS). This policy creates a tension with the ongoing teacher recruitment crisis by potentially restricting a school’s ability to hire unqualified subject experts, like artists or musicians, and limiting a school’s capacity to innovate or fill staffing gaps. Additionally, the government’s plan to change the mandatory conversion of ‘Inadequate’ maintained schools into academies to a “discretionary power” is expected to take effect over the next 12 months.


The New Era of Accountability

Ofsted’s Framework Transformation

From Single Grades to Detailed Report Cards

From November 2025, a significant shift in the accountability framework will come into force. The single-word judgments of “Outstanding,” “Good,” “Requires Improvement,” and “Inadequate” will be replaced by a new, more detailed “report card” system. My views on their late summer term announcements, my belief in their quest for the educational Golden Ratio can be found via that link.  

This change is intended to provide a more nuanced understanding of school performance, moving beyond the high-stakes, simplistic model that created immense pressure on leaders and staff.

The new report card will assess schools across up to 11 distinct areas of evaluation. The new framework places a critical emphasis on safeguarding, which will be judged on a binary “Met” or “Not Met” scale—a clear signal that it is a non-negotiable standard. The new system also aims to incorporate contextual data, acknowledging the unique challenges faced by schools in areas with higher socio-economic complexities.

The New Inspection Experience

The inspection process itself is also changing to alleviate pressure on school leaders and staff. Schools will now be notified of an inspection at 9:30 AM on a Monday, with the inspection commencing the following day. A key procedural change relates to how inspectors will conduct their work. For graded (Section 5) inspections, “deep dives” will continue to be used to gather evidence of the curriculum, but for ungraded inspections, they will be replaced by “areas of focus”. This strategic shift from a prescriptive process to a collaboratively agreed upon agenda presents a major opportunity for leaders to shape the inspection narrative.


Strategic Recommendations and Action Plan

Based on the forthcoming changes, a tiered, prioritised action plan is recommended for school leaders to ensure compliance and effective forward-planning.

Immediate Actions (for September 2025)

  • Financial Review: Re-evaluate budget baselines and projections, accounting for the consolidation of grants into the NFF and the new MFG parameters. For maintained schools, assess the viability of the DfE energy purchase scheme and implement robust internal controls to manage potential financial risks from non-compliance.
  • Compliance & Policy Update: Immediately review and update all safeguarding policies to align with the new statutory guidance in Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) 2025 and the updated Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) framework. Given that non-compliance with the EYFS framework is a criminal offence, this review must be meticulous.
  • Staff Training: Mandate a briefing for all staff on the new statutory status of attendance guidance and the expanded online risks (disinformation, misinformation, conspiracy theories) outlined in KCSIE.
  • Accountability Preparation: Conduct a full internal self-evaluation against the new Ofsted report card criteria. Leaders should prepare documentation and data that provides rich context for each of the graded areas.
  • I would also highly recommend leaders evaluate their GSCE results against this review of the statements and statistics on said results via this link: subtleties of a ‘stable’ system

Mid-Term Priorities (for the 2026 Academic Year)

  • Curriculum Planning: Begin strategic planning for the implementation of the new RSHE guidance. Initiate the parental consultation process early and consider piloting the new curriculum content, particularly on online harms and suicide prevention, to prepare for the statutory deadline.
  • Recruitment Strategy: Reassess recruitment strategies in light of the new QTS requirement for all new teachers.
  • Policy Monitoring: Closely monitor the legislative progress of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill and other forthcoming white papers to anticipate further changes to the education landscape.

Table 1: The National Funding Formula 2025/26 – Deconstructing the Uplift

This table is based on provisional data from a local authority and is intended to illustrate the financial impact of grant consolidation, not as a definitive national calculation.

FactorSub-level2024-25 (£)2025-26 (£)Variance Excl. Grant Transfer (£)Variance Excl. Grant Transfer (%)
Basic EntitlementPrimary3,5623,8472640.6%
Age Weighted Pupil Unit (AWPU)Key Stage 35,0225,4223710.6%
Age Weighted Pupil Unit (AWPU)Key Stage 45,6616,1134190.6%
DeprivationPrimary FSM49049500%

Table 2: The New Ofsted Report Card Judgements

The new grading scales are still being finalised, but the areas of assessment are established.

Area of EvaluationDescriptionGrading Scale
CurriculumDesign and implementation of the school’s curriculum.Five-point scale (details to follow)
Developing TeachingQuality and effectiveness of teaching practices.Five-point scale (details to follow)
Leadership and GovernanceEffectiveness of leadership and management structures.Five-point scale (details to follow)
Behaviour and AttitudesPupil conduct and the school’s approach to fostering positive behaviour.Five-point scale (details to follow)
AttendancePupil attendance rates and the effectiveness of attendance policies.Five-point scale (details to follow)
Personal Development and Well-beingHow the school supports pupils’ personal growth and mental health.Five-point scale (details to follow)
AchievementPupil progress and academic outcomes.Five-point scale (details to follow)
InclusionSupport for vulnerable and disadvantaged pupils, including SEND.Five-point scale (details to follow)
SafeguardingMeeting required standards for pupil safeguarding and welfare.Binary scale: “Met” or “Not Met”
Early Years (if applicable)Evaluation of the early years setting.Five-point scale (details to follow)
Sixth Form (if applicable)Evaluation of the sixth form setting.Five-point scale (details to follow)

The Interconnectedness of Change

The changes anticipated for the 2025/26 academic year are not isolated policy adjustments but are part of a deeply interconnected, strategic re-shaping of the education landscape. The new Ofsted framework, with its heightened focus on safeguarding, curriculum, and attendance, holds leaders accountable for the very policies and procedures that have been updated.

To successfully navigate this period, school leaders must abandon a siloed approach to planning. Just as the waterfalls at Devil’s Bridge are a continuous, powerful force, a leader’s work is a relentless cycle of vigilance and renewal. Financial decisions must be made with a full understanding of their implications for compliance and curriculum delivery. Similarly, safeguarding protocols must be viewed not only as a duty but as a central part of a school’s overall effectiveness, as it will now be a binary determinant of inspection outcomes. By adopting a holistic, proactive, and data-driven approach, school leaders can ensure their institutions are well-equipped to meet the challenges and opportunities of the coming year.

Have a superb start to the term.

Useful links:

DfE Statutory Guidance and Resources


Ofsted Guidance and Reports

A simple, Smart Summary of the article is available here: https://theauthenticleader.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/jacobs-ladder-smart-summary.pptx

Tagged , , , , , ,

The Authentic Leader’s Playbook for 2025/26 – pre-GCSE results.

In the dynamic and sometimes dizzying world of education, change is constant. For the 2025/26 academic year, a number of significant shifts are on the horizon, from updated inspection frameworks to new safeguarding guidance and changes in staff pay. While some leaders may view these updates as a series of reactive hurdles, authentic leadership must be defined by a proactive stance, the ability to look ahead, anticipate new challenges, and prepare the school community for what is to come. This approach transforms potential disruptions into opportunities for strategic growth and collaborative adaptation. Staying ahead of the curve, scoping the possibilities and pitfalls allows a level of confidence, a sense of control and the beginnings of a playbook of approaches.

One of the most prominent changes is the impending new Ofsted inspection framework, expected to take effect in November 2025. This framework will replace the current single-grade judgments with a more detailed report card system and a new five-point grading scale. For the authentic leader, this isn’t just a matter of waiting for the new rules to be published. It’s a chance to elevate intentionality by beginning conversations with staff now, analysing the proposed “evaluation areas” and identifying where current practices align and where improvements can be made. By using the consultation outcomes as a guide for ongoing self-evaluation, a proactive leader ensures their school is already operating with the new standards in mind, making any future inspections less of an event and more of a confirmation of existing good practice.

Equally critical are the financial and staffing updates, most notably the 4% pay award for teachers and support staff. While the DfE will cover a portion of this, schools are responsible for the remainder, a detail that requires meticulous financial planning. Authentic leaders, understanding that stability is built on transparency, have already factored this into their budgets and have begun transparent conversations with their teams about how the increase will be managed. They recognize that a leader who is “on the horizon” understands that financial decisions directly impact staff morale and retention, and they will use this opportunity to champion growth and evolution by showing their team that they are valued and supported.

Furthermore, a series of important updates to statutory guidance, including Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) and the new rules on the use of reasonable force, demand more than a last-minute policy review. The authentic leader sees these as a mandate to deepen the school’s commitment to safety and wellbeing. They will ensure that their staff receive comprehensive training on the new requirements—such as the need to record significant incidents of force—long before the September deadline. By embracing the spirit of the updated guidance, a leader doesn’t just meet a minimum standard; they foster a culture where student and staff safety is a continuous priority, not a box-ticking exercise. The updated RSE guidance, which can be adopted from September 2025, also falls into this category, requiring thoughtful consultation and proactive curriculum development to support pupils appropriately. This process helps to combat complacency by moving beyond rote compliance and fostering a genuine sense of purpose.

Ofsted’s New Inspection Framework

One of the most prominent changes is the new Ofsted inspection framework, expected to take effect in November 2025. It replaces single-word judgments with a detailed report card system and a five-point grading scale ranging from causing concern to exemplary. For authentic leaders, this is a call to initiate staff discussions now—reviewing proposed evaluation areas and aligning current practices with future expectations.

Using the consultation outcomes as a guide for ongoing self-evaluation ensures that the school is already operating in line with the new standards, making future inspections less disruptive and more confirmation of existing good practice.

Staff Pay and Financial Planning

Equally critical are the financial and staffing updates, notably the 4% pay award for teachers and support staff. The Department for Education (DfE) will fund part of this increase, but schools must cover the remainder. Details are available via the DfE’s funding update.

Authentic leaders will have already factored this into their budgets and begun transparent conversations with staff about how the increase will be managed. They understand that financial decisions directly affect morale and retention and use this moment to reinforce that staff are valued and supported.

Safeguarding and Statutory Guidance

The updated Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) guidance, effective from September 2025, introduces new expectations, including the requirement to record significant incidents involving the use of force. This is supported by revised guidance on reasonable force, which outlines statutory duties for schools.

Authentic leaders will ensure staff receive comprehensive training well ahead of the deadline. They embrace the spirit of guidance not just to meet minimum standards, but to cultivate a culture where safety and wellbeing are continuous priorities.

School Uniform: Affordability and Policy Reform

The cost of school uniform has come under renewed scrutiny. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has urged schools to immediately limit the number of branded items required, ahead of a statutory cap due in September 2026. The proposed cap will limit branded items to three at primary and four at secondary, including PE kit and ties.

Pepe Di’Iasio, General Secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), responded by affirming that schools are already mindful of financial pressures on families. He supported the intent behind the policy but suggested that a cap on total uniform cost might be a more effective solution. He also highlighted the broader issue of child poverty, calling for a meaningful government strategy to address it.

Authentic leaders will take this moment to review their uniform policies, engage in consultation with families, and ensure that affordability is central to their approach. This is not just about compliance, it is about equity, dignity, and ensuring every child can attend school without financial strain. One less barrier, one less excuse; one less concern.

Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) Updates

The updated RSE statutory guidance, published in July 2025, can be adopted from September 2025, with full implementation expected by September 2026. This guidance calls for thoughtful curriculum development and meaningful consultation with parents and pupils.

Authentic leaders will treat this as an opportunity to strengthen the school’s approach to personal development, ensuring that RSE is inclusive, age-appropriate, and aligned with the school’s values.

Authentic leader’s understands that the educational landscape is constantly shifting. They do not merely react to government bills and guidance as they come into force but rather anticipate their arrival. By paying close attention to upcoming changes in inspection, staffing, and safeguarding, they can strategically prepare their school, ensuring that policies, practices, and people are all aligned. This foresight creates a stable and resilient school community, transforming external mandates into internal, collaborative opportunities for improvement and allowing them to inspire deeper connections with their staff and children.

The authentic leader, in every interaction, acts as an architect of their school’s future.

Scoping What’s Coming Over the Hill: A Call to Action for Education Leaders

In March 2025, the government released their initial findings on the Curriculum and Assessment Review, a link to my synthesis written in March is here: C&A interim educational landscape the current provision March 2025.pdf The UK government’s Curriculum and Assessment Review is being led by Professor Becky Francis CBE.

She is the Chief Executive of the Education Endowment Foundation and an expert in education policy, particularly regarding curriculum and social inequality. She chairs a panel of experts who are working on the review. An interim report was published in March 2025, with the final report and recommendations expected in autumn 2025.

As July gentle fades into August and the beginning of a proper shutdown for this authentic leader – this is me attempting to be more Lyme Regis, it feels like I must get a few matters out of my mind, partly to allow the Lyme Regis and partly to lay down some plans on what we must do next.

Strategic Priorities

The recent Educational Landscape Review has illuminated critical areas demanding urgent attention from education leaders. Far from being a mere critique, the review serves as a roadmap for future-proofing our educational system, ensuring it remains equitable, relevant, and effective for all learners. In the coming months, leaders must proactively address the identified disparities, curriculum imbalances, and structural weaknesses to prepare for the inevitable changes these insights will precipitate. This involves a multi-faceted approach focused on fostering equitable access, refining curriculum, enhancing future relevance, and strengthening post-16 provisions, all while cultivating a culture of adaptability and continuous improvement.

Firstly, addressing the persistent disparities in equitable access and outcomes, particularly for disadvantaged and SEND learners, must be paramount. While the knowledge-rich curriculum has yielded overall attainment improvements, its impact has not been uniformly positive. Education leaders need to move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach and embed a robust social justice lens across all educational practices. This means scrutinising existing support systems and designing targeted interventions that genuinely elevate aspirations and equip every learner with the skills and confidence for life and work. In the coming months, this will entail a thorough audit of current provisions for these groups, engaging with their families and communities to understand their unique needs, and allocating resources strategically to bridge attainment gaps. Professional development for staff on inclusive pedagogies and differentiated instruction will be crucial to ensure all teachers are equipped to support diverse learners effectively.

Secondly, the review’s findings on curriculum structure and content necessitate a bold re-evaluation of what and how we teach. The tension between breadth and depth, the primary curriculum overload, and the premature narrowing of KS3 due to early GCSE preparation are undermining foundational learning and fostering disengagement. Education leaders must initiate a comprehensive review of curriculum sequencing across all key stages, prioritising mastery of core concepts over superficial coverage. For Key Stages 1 and 2, this means advocating for a streamlined curriculum that allows for deeper exploration of foundational literacy and numeracy. At Key Stage 3, leaders must champion a curriculum that maintains its breadth, encourages intellectual curiosity, and avoids rote repetition, allowing students to genuinely engage with subjects before specialization. The ongoing review of EBacc constraints demands close attention, and leaders should be prepared to advocate for reforms that promote a child’s choice and a more balanced curriculum. I would go further and argue that the curriculum from Key Stage 3 to Key Stage 4 must evolve from broad and balanced and become ‘Developed and Divergent’.

[see https://theauthenticleader.uk/2025/07/24/crafting-excellence-a-four-movement-symphony-of-the-key-stage-4-curriculum-in-england/]

This period requires proactive collaboration with teachers to identify areas for curriculum refinement and to pilot new approaches that foster deeper learning.

Thirdly, ensuring curriculum relevance for future needs is no longer an option but a necessity. The call for modernisation to reflect digital literacy, sustainability, and global challenges, alongside addressing subject-specific imbalances and vagueness, signals a need for significant curricular evolution. Education leaders must champion the integration of 21st-century skills and global competencies across all subjects, moving beyond outdated content. This will require investing in teacher training for new pedagogical approaches and digital tools. Furthermore, the imperative to reflect diverse identities and broaden pupils’ horizons within the curriculum must be taken seriously. This is not just about representation but about fostering a more inclusive and globally aware citizenry. In the coming months, engaging with external experts, industry leaders, and community groups will be vital to inform these curricular updates and ensure their practical relevance.

Finally, the review’s insights into 16-19 provisions and qualifications highlight systemic issues that demand immediate attention. While A-levels retain their strength, the lack of clarity and instability in vocational pathways are causing poor outcomes for a significant cohort of learners. Education leaders must work collaboratively with further education colleges, employers, and policymakers to establish clearer, more valued vocational routes that genuinely prepare students for the workforce. The acknowledged failure of the GCSE re-sit policy for English and Maths underscores the need for a more nuanced approach to supporting these learners. Furthermore, while SATs have value, concerns about grammar and writing assessments impacting literacy development warrant a careful re-evaluation. The impending review of GCSE reform, particularly regarding exam stress and assessment volume, offers an opportunity for leaders to advocate for a more holistic and less high-stakes assessment system that genuinely measures learning. This period calls for strong advocacy and practical solutions to create a more diverse and effective post-16 landscape.

The Educational Landscape Review presents a formidable yet exciting challenge for education leaders in the coming months. The identified key points are not isolated issues but interconnected threads that weave the fabric of our educational system. By prioritising equitable access, rigorously refining curriculum, championing future relevance, and strengthening post-16 provisions, leaders can proactively shape the evolution of education. This will require courageous decision-making, collaborative spirit, and an unwavering commitment to putting the needs of all learners at the heart of every reform. The coming months are a crucial period for laying the groundwork for a more just, responsive, and effective education system for generations to come.

Leadership Reflections

Our first, and perhaps most resonant, chord must be struck in the realm of equitable access and outcomes. The knowledge-rich curriculum, while yielding overall attainment improvements, has revealed persistent disparities, casting a spotlight on our disadvantaged and SEND learners. This is a call to “truly see” beyond the metrics to the human stories. Leaders must move beyond programmatic fixes, embedding a social justice lens so deeply that it becomes an intrinsic part of our educational DNA. This means a daily recommitment, a “fall in love with you every day” philosophy, to the vital connections with every student, ensuring high aspirations are not just words but lived realities. In the coming months, this demands a self-reflective audit of current support systems, engaging in open dialogue with families and communities to understand their unique needs, and allocating resources with discerning strategic patience. Professional development must become a crucible for inclusive pedagogies, empowering every educator to navigate the intricate emotional landscapes of their classrooms.

Secondly, the very architecture of our curriculum, its structure and content, demands an intellectual alchemy. The tension between breadth and depth, the overwhelming deluge of the primary curriculum, and the premature narrowing of Key Stage 3 are not mere administrative challenges; they are impediments to genuine mastery and intellectual curiosity. Education leaders must orchestrate a dynamic interplay of intention and action. This means meticulously planning and defining a culture where foundational concepts are mastered, not merely touched upon. For Key Stages 1 and 2, the imperative is a streamlined curriculum that allows for deeper exploration, much like the thoughtful cultivation envisioned in Huxley’s “Island”. At Key Stage 3, we must champion a curriculum that resists the pull of early specialization, preserving its breadth and fostering engagement. The ongoing review of EBacc constraints offers an opportunity for leaders to advocate for reforms that prioritise children’s choice and curriculum balance, recognising that a truly rich education is a symphony, not a monotone. This period requires proactive collaboration with teachers, nurturing their potential, and empowering them as the “lifeboats” of the school.

Thirdly, the relevance of our curriculum for future needs is a profound imperative. A knowledge-rich foundation remains vital, but it must be a living, evolving entity, reflecting the digital complexities, the sustainability challenges, and the global interconnectedness of our world. Leaders must relentlessly combat complacency, challenging the status quo by integrating 21st-century skills and global competencies across all subjects. This is about enriching the soil of our educational landscape so that diverse identities can flourish and childrens’ horizons are broadened beyond measure.

In essence, the Educational Landscape Review is a perpetual overture to ongoing work, a deepening commitment to educational justice. For education leaders in the coming months, it is a call to embody authentic leadership: to elevate intentionality, combat complacency, champion growth, and inspire deeper connection. By embracing these movements, we can ensure that the “Alchemy of Belief” continues to transform lives, one intentional act at a time, building a resilient, compassionate, and truly authentic education system.

Authentic Action Pathways

  • Recommit Daily to Your Purpose: Adopt the mantra, “I Fall in Love with You Every Day”. This isn’t a romantic ideal, but a conscious, deliberate choice to revitalise essential bonds with children, colleagues, families, and the fundamental mission of education itself. It’s a philosophical stance against complacency, ensuring you remain connected to the “why” behind your work.
  • Cultivate Emotional Intelligence as a Survival Mechanism: Draw lessons from the “crucible” of challenging experiences. Understand that self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management are not just theories, but practical tools “forged in the fires of continuous crisis”. Embrace your “scars” as sources of profound self-awareness, enabling you to map the intricate emotional landscapes of schools.
  • Transform Weaknesses into Strengths: Confront perceived weaknesses head-on, just as the author transformed impatience into strategic patience and a need for control into deep trust. This journey of strengthening oneself through challenging experiences is central to authentic leadership, embracing imperfections to deepen empathy and wisdom.
  • See Beyond the Metrics – “Truly See”: As inspired by John Berger’s “Ways of Seeing,” strive to “truly see” beyond superficial data points to the human stories and individual complexities within your school. This holistic view is essential for understanding the nuances of equitable access and outcomes.
  • Champion Intentionality: Meticulously plan and define the culture you wish to cultivate, much like the author’s articulation of “Belonging, Connection, and Purpose”. Intentionality elevates every action, ensuring alignment with your core values and desired outcomes.
  • Combat Complacency with Healthy Disruption: Don’t shy away from challenging the status quo. Use tools like anonymized student narratives to highlight the human cost of insufficient systems, fostering a healthy disruption that leads to improvement.
  • Empower Middle Leaders – Your “Lifeboats”: Actively cultivate the potential of your middle leaders, whom the blog affectionately terms the “lifeboats” of the school. This distributed leadership, informed by Alma Harris’s insights, empowers others and builds collective capacity.
  • Inspire Deeper Connection and Resonant Harmony: Foster empathetic listening and consistent adult behaviour. Remember Paul Dix’s principle, “When the Adults Change, Everything Changes,” and strive to build a community where belonging is fostered through fairness and mutual respect, guided by the “unseen contract” of Tim Scanlon.
  • Foster Open Dialogue and Collective Wisdom: Encourage open dialogue about both achievements and challenges. This fosters a culture where collective wisdom can flourish, leading to continuous improvement and a shared sense of ownership.

Authentic Pathways

Pathway 1: Be Clear About What We’re Doing – Our School’s Heartbeat

  • This is about making sure everyone knows why we’re teaching what we’re teaching, and how it connects to our school’s values and goals.
  • Define Our School’s Culture: Let’s work together (teachers, leaders, maybe even students and parents) to decide what makes our school special – like feeling like you belong, having good connections, and understanding our purpose. This will guide everything we do.
  • Check Our Lesson Plans: Look at our subject plans. Do they show how we help students feel like they belong, connect with others, and find their purpose? Do they push students to aim high?
  • Understand Why We Test: For every test or assessment, let’s be clear about its reason. Is it to help students learn, to see what they know, or to find out where they need help? How does each test help students feel connected to their learning journey?
  • Listen to Everyone: Make sure we have ways to hear from everyone involved – teachers, students, parents, and school leaders – as we go through this review.

Pathway 2: Don’t Just Stick to the Old Ways – Look for What’s Missing

  • This pathway is about honestly looking at what we’re doing now and finding ways to make it better, even if it means trying new things.
  • Hear From Students: Let’s find ways to collect honest, anonymous feedback from students about what they like (or don’t like) in their lessons and tests. This helps us see the real impact of our system.
  • Map Our Lessons: Let’s look at all our lesson plans across different years. Are we repeating too much? Are there big gaps? Are we forcing younger students to focus too early on exam subjects, making them bored later?
  • Check How Many Tests We Do: Let’s count all the tests and assignments students have, especially older ones. Ask students and teachers if they feel too much stress from tests, and if every test is truly useful.
  • Talk About Why Students Zone Out: Get teachers together to talk openly about why students might lose interest in lessons or tests. Let’s not be afraid to shake things up a bit if needed.

Pathway 3: Help Everyone Grow – Empowering Our Key People

  • This pathway is about helping our colleagues, especially our subject leaders, get better at what they do and lead improvements.
  • Train Our Subject Leaders: Give special training and support to our subject leaders. Teach them how to develop lessons and design tests, and how to lead their teams effectively. They are like the “lifeboats” of our school, guiding us.
  • Update Our Lessons: Ask our subject leaders and teachers to brainstorm ideas for making our lessons more modern. How can we include topics like digital skills, caring for the planet, world issues, and show different cultures and viewpoints?
  • Invent Better Tests: Encourage our subject leaders and teachers to come up with new, creative ways to test students. The aim is to make tests less stressful but still show what students have learned and really help with reading and writing skills.
  • Learn Together: Start or restart groups where teachers can learn from each other about the best ways to teach. Focus on helping all students learn deeply and get the support they need, especially those who find learning harder.

Pathway 4: Build Stronger Connections – Creating a Supportive Community

  • This pathway is about making our school a place where everyone feels connected and respected, and where decisions are made together.
  • Listen and Get Feedback: Set up ways for teachers and students to regularly give feedback on new lesson ideas or test changes. Listen carefully and openly to everyone, remembering that “When the Adults Change, Everything Changes.”
  • Agree on Fair Testing: Have discussions to make sure everyone agrees on what fair and respectful testing looks like. This is about building trust and making sure everyone feels like they belong, based on an “unseen agreement” of fairness.
  • Try Out New Ideas: Pick a few key areas or subjects to try out new lesson plans or test methods first. See how they work, get feedback, and make changes as needed. We don’t have to get it perfect right away.
  • Share Our Progress: Clearly tell everyone – students, parents, staff, and school leaders – about the changes we’re making and why they’re good. Celebrate our successes and show that we’re all working together to make our school better and fairer for everyone. This is a continuous journey towards fairness in education.

Finally, embrace the “Perpetual Overture”: Recognise that leadership is not about a final destination, but a “perpetual overture” to ongoing work. This mindset encourages continuous improvement and a deepening commitment, allowing for adaptability in the face of evolving challenges.

And with that, there will be a round up for subscribers in the next couple of days and I will be back around results week. In many respects I hope you are re-visiting this after a good, restful and well-earned break. For me, the rest comes when I have cleared and sorted my mind into the right boxes, ready for moving onto the next academic year.

Requiesce et otium sume.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

The Restorative Power of a Day at the Seaside: A Lyme Regis Perspective

Sometimes, the most profound acts of self-care are born from unexpected, spur-of-the-moment decisions. A sudden break from the relentless demands of school leadership, a spontaneous turn towards the coast, can be more than just a vacation; it can be a declaration of freedom, a desire for change, and a fundamental need for rest. Such was the case with an impromptu trip to Lyme Regis, a decision driven by an authentic leader’s innate understanding that true vitality, much like the “daily recommitment” to a mission, requires conscious revitalisation. This wasn’t merely about escaping work, but about embracing a different rhythm, a necessary recalibration of mind and spirit.

There are few experiences as universally cherished and profoundly restorative as a day spent by the sea. The unique confluence of sensory inputs, psychological detachment, and natural beauty offers a potent antidote to the stresses of modern life. And for those seeking a particularly grounding and historically rich escape, Monmouth Beach in Lyme Regis stands as a testament to the enduring benefits of coastal immersion. As much as a walk hand-in-hand, as much as that self-indulgent moment, as much as that guilty pleasure.

Stepping onto Monmouth Beach, the immediate shift in atmosphere is palpable. The soft, rhythmic whisper of sand found on other shores is replaced by the satisfying, percussive tumble of pebbles underfoot, a natural symphony orchestrated by the ebb and flow of the tide. This distinct soundscape instantly draws one into a state of mindfulness, the consistent, predictable rhythm acting as a balm to a restless mind. The rhythmic crackle of waves retreating from this pebbled shore. The air, crisp and saline, invigorates the senses, carrying the subtle scent of the ocean that promises rejuvenation. This refreshing breeze is often laden with beneficial negative ions, which are believed to enhance mood and energy levels, contributing to a profound sense of well-being. Visually, the vast expanse of Lyme Bay stretches out, meeting the horizon in a calming blue, embodying the “blue space” effect that soothes the mind and encourages a sense of peace. The dramatic, ancient Ware Cliffs loom overhead, a powerful reminder of geological time, further enhancing the feeling of perspective.

Monmouth Beach, in particular, encourages a unique form of engagement that fosters deep relaxation: fossil hunting. This isn’t merely a pastime; it’s a meditative act. With eyes scanning the shingle and pebbles, seeking the tell-tale spiral of an ammonite or the subtle imprint of a belemnite, the mind is entirely absorbed in the present moment. Worries about deadlines, errands, or digital notifications simply recede, replaced by a focused, almost childlike wonder. The discovery of a 200-million-year-old fossil, a tangible link to a primordial world, provides not just a thrill but a profound sense of perspective, shrinking contemporary anxieties against the backdrop of deep time. This deliberate engagement offers a powerful disconnect from the digital world, allowing the mind to truly reset.

Beyond the profound natural engagement, a day at the seaside also offers the simple, unadulterated pleasure of embracing local traditions. The consumption of classic seaside foods – a warm, hearty pasty, the comforting crunch of freshly fried fish and chips, followed by a sweet, cooling ice cream – becomes an integral part of the restorative experience. These culinary delights, savoured with the salty air on one’s tongue and the sound of the waves in the background, ground the moment in pure, unpretentious joy, further cementing the break from everyday pressures.

The physical act of walking on the uneven terrain of Monmouth Beach, feeling the pebbles shift and settle, offers a gentle yet effective form of exercise. This natural grounding, combined with the fresh sea air and the subtle boost of sunlight, contributes to a feeling of holistic physical and mental well-being. Mentally, the expansive views and the sheer scale of the natural environment encourage “big picture” thinking, allowing for a healthy detachment from personal concerns and a renewed sense of clarity. The absence of urban clamour and the presence of natural elements provide a unique environment for the nervous system to rebalance.

A day at Monmouth Beach is more than just a break; it’s a reset for the mind, body, and spirit. It’s an opportunity to reconnect with the elemental forces of nature, to engage the senses in a deeply satisfying way, and to find quietude in the rhythmic dance of the sea. The rugged beauty, the whisper of ancient history in every stone, and the sheer simplicity of the experience combine to offer a truly profound and lasting sense of peace, leaving one refreshed, re-energised, and ready to face the world anew.

I write this to encourage the day out, experience the Great British Holiday against the GBH of the working world; I write this to also carry something of those moments with me. A reminder of the need to be more Lyme Regis in depths of November, at the heights of the exam season and on that Monday morning when nothing seems to be going to plan and all that is left is the complexities of unravelling the issues and concerns of others.

The Authentic Leader must be more Lyme Regis.

Tagged , , , , , ,

The Movements So Far: A Symphony of Purpose and Resilience

The full story is available for you to read here: IFILWYED.pdf I tried, I succeeded, I failed. I tried again, but with a greater sense of purpose and with a more introspective review of how I failed. I had to grow and I needed to stop hiding from myself as well as others. A cathartic experience, the key purpose of writing again became about the following:

Emotional Release and Inner Cleansing: I wrote this “I Fall in Love with you Every Day”, as a way to process the emotional distress and psychological harm I experienced. It became a space where I could finally voice the unspeakable feelings I had, allowing me to confront the turbulent and complex terrain of my inner life. I recounted the sleepless nights, the gnawing pressure, and the relentless emotional siege I endured during my leadership journey, especially the deeply personal wound from missing out on the Headship. The very act of composing this ‘symphony’ was my way of grappling with my human experience in the often-brutal reality of school improvement, helping me to cleanse myself of those pent-up emotions.

Gaining Clarity and Perspective (Cognitive Dimension): Through these writings, I embarked on a deep reflection, weaving in philosophical musings, practical insights, and candid self-assessment. My aim was to achieve holistic understanding and healing, and to reconstruct my beliefs from multiple perspectives. Writing the ‘Adagio’ movement, my personal and professional reckoning after the missed Headship, forced me into a period of intense self-doubt and painful reassessment. By articulating these experiences, I gained immense clarity on both my perceived failings and the genuine strengths that emerged from their shadows, ultimately understanding my journey more profoundly.

Healing and Processing: This work was fundamentally about seeking holistic understanding and healing, and about reconstructing my beliefs after what felt like a traumatic experience. Structuring it as a symphony provided a profound, and often subconscious, pathway for processing my emotional distress. The ‘Adagio’ movement, in particular, became a space for lament and reflection, allowing me to unfold my grief and quietly acknowledge my pain. Ultimately, the ‘Finale’ strives for resolution and catharsis, guiding me towards integration and a renewed sense of hope, which are crucial steps in my healing process.

Self-Discovery and Authenticity: This work represents a deeply personal and professional reflection, a necessary self-excavation. Through its pages, I’ve revealed my psychology, driven by a powerful blend of idealism and pragmatism, and my unwavering belief in the boundless potential of every child. I’ve openly acknowledged the resilience forged in adversity and the ‘scars and the steel’ that now inform my leadership. This writing allowed me to expose the lived realities of exhaustion, disappointment, and vulnerability, making my internal monologue visible and leading to a more authentic understanding of myself.

A Sense of Relief and Lightness: While I don’t explicitly state feeling ‘light,’ the overarching purpose of personal catharsis in this document inherently implies a profound sense of relief. By structuring my experiences as a symphony, aiming for resolution in the ‘Finale,’ I’ve sought to move towards a state of equilibrium and release from the burden of my past struggles. The continuous process of reconstructing my beliefs and striving to move forward signifies a shedding of emotional weight and a renewed sense of purpose.

I now offer what I feel was the most purposed aspect of writing “I Fall in Love with you Every Day” outside of the start, and that is the finish.

The Movements So Far: A Symphony of Purpose and Resilience

Like any grand composition, my professional and personal journey has unfolded in movements, each shaping its melody. It began, as all symphonies must, with an Overture – that daily, intentional commitment to “falling in love.” This wasn’t merely a romantic notion, but an active, philosophical stance against complacency, constantly re-engaging with the vital connections of pedagogy, people, and passion. It set the tone, introducing the overarching theme: that education, at its heart, is a continuous discovery, transforming routine into a symphony of purpose.

The First Movement, an Allegro of turbulent intensity, was marked by a decade-long odyssey at The International School, reborn as Tile Cross Academy. This was a raw, visceral period of wrestling with profound challenges, where Covey’s “seven chronic problems” felt like a direct diagnosis of the school’s very soul. It was a relentless fight for social mobility, fuelled by my own complex background and a fierce belief in justice, often against formidable odds. Despite moments of despair, there was also an exhilarating, restless search for equilibrium, finding fragile flickers of hope in small, hard-won victories. This was the movement of unyielding dedication, a crucible forging the very essence of my convictions.

Then came the Second Movement, an Adagio of profound lament. The Headship disappointment at Tile Cross was a deeply personal wound, profoundly questioning my value and principles after a decade poured into that space. It offered a necessary, albeit painful, space for reflection, acknowledging the emotional toll and processing the raw truth of an unmet aspiration. This was where the lyrical lines of self-assessment found their voice, prompting a crucial shift in perspective.

The Third Movement, a Minuet/Scherzo, emerged as a period of rhythmic shifts and evolving strategies during my transition to Saltley Academy. The landscape was different, seemingly “Good,” yet subtle echoes of past challenges resonated. My coping mechanisms shifted from crisis-driven salvaging to strategic patience and a deeper understanding of influence. Emotional intelligence became my indispensable tool, allowing me to navigate complexities with self-awareness, empathy, and a nuanced approach. This movement involved fragmented attempts to find new forms of release and impact, subtly recalibrating my leadership from direct mandate to relational influence.

Now, the Concluding Allegro is underway, striving for integration and renewed hope. The profound lessons learned resonate: dedication alone, however fierce, is insufficient without the adaptive power of emotional intelligence, trust-building, and true collaboration. The resilience forged in adversity has become a powerful testament, its scars etched into the very score of who I am. My unwavering motivation remains rooted in equitable opportunity for children, families, and communities. The hard-earned wisdom now fuels a pervasive culture of high expectations and distributed leadership, where every small breakthrough, act of teacher creativity, collective purpose, and refusal to accept limitations reaffirms that “falling in love” continues, day after day. The journey is far from over; it is a symphony in perpetual composition, its commitment renewed, its love deepening, and its belief in a more just future strengthening with every note.

The Fourth Movement: The Finale – Integration and Legacy

The curtain is not merely rising; it is receding. The preceding movements—the overture’s philosophical declaration, the turbulent allegro of Tile Cross, the reflective adagio of my Headship disappointment, and the nuanced scherzo of early Saltley adaptation—have set the stage. Now, the Fourth Movement begins. This is the Finale, a grand Allegro or Vivace, where all themes converge, where dissonances find resolution, and where the intricate harmonies of my personal growth and the collective flourishing of Saltley Academy intertwine into a resonant, unifying whole. This is the integration, the purposeful culmination of a journey that seeks to leave not just an echo, but a lasting legacy.

The Conductor’s Baton: Integrating Self and System

My capacity to lead Saltley Academy, to truly orchestrate its progress, is inextricably linked to the conductor within. The “symphony of the soul,” described in the overture, no longer plays a separate, internal score; it now harmonizes directly with the dynamic reality of school leadership. The obligato of my own growth – the lessons learned, the scars earned, the wisdom hard-won – is not a distraction, but the very essence that enriches the collective composition of Team Saltley.

I recall a moment early in my Saltley tenure when an emerging middle leader, bright-eyed and brimming with ideas, approached me with a proposal for a new pastoral initiative. In my Tile Cross days, particularly during its more chaotic phases, my instinct would have been to dive in, perhaps even take the reins, driven by that almost visceral need to ‘fix’ and to control. But the adagio of disappointment, the period of profound self-reflection after the Headship interview, had taught me the quiet power of the pause. Instead, I listened, truly listened, allowing his vision to unfold, asking questions that invited him to deepen his own thinking rather than simply seeking my validation. My emotional intelligence, honed through the fires of near-burnout and the sting of personal setbacks, allowed me to self-manage the instinctual urge to dominate. I could feel the familiar pull, the old patterns of wanting to be “Captain Ahab,” but I consciously wielded the conductor’s baton differently. I allowed the space, the silence between the notes, for his own melody to emerge.

This is the constant practice of integrating my inner self with my outward leadership. It’s about recognizing when my experiences or anxieties might color my perception and consciously adjusting the lens. The resilience forged in adversity isn’t just about bouncing back; it’s about the capacity to remain calm amidst the storm, to trust others, and to lead with a grounded presence. It means acknowledging the shadow of the “second fiddle” – that lingering feeling of being the supporting act – but transforming it into the strength of the “second violin section,” providing essential harmonic foundation and rhythmic drive, ensuring the entire ensemble flourishes.

Reflection for Leaders:

  • The Conductor’s Inner Score: How conscious are you of your emotional state and personal history influencing your daily leadership decisions? Can you identify a recent instance where your past experience (positive or negative) subtly shaped your reaction to a new challenge?
  • The Power of the Pause: In what situations do you tend to jump in quickly with solutions or directives? What might it look like to intentionally “pause” and allow space for your team members’ ideas and solutions to emerge first?
  • Transforming Personal Scars: Consider a professional setback or personal challenge you’ve faced. How has that experience, though painful, ultimately deepened your empathy, resilience, or leadership capabilities? How can you consciously leverage this “scarred wisdom” in your current role?

The Meticulous Score: Elevating Intentionality in Action

In this Finale, ‘Elevating Intentionality’ is not merely a philosophical pronouncement; it is the meticulous score that guides every instrumentalist. It is about moving beyond reactive leadership, where we simply respond to the cacophony of daily demands, to a proactive composition where every note, every phrase, serves a deliberate purpose.

At Saltley, this has manifested in a thousand small, deliberate choices. I recall the shift in our weekly senior leadership team meetings. Previously, the agenda, though structured, often felt like a laundry list of immediate problems. Now, prompted by a conscious effort to Elevate Intentionality, each agenda item is framed with its “why,” its desired outcome, and its link to our overarching “Belonging, Connection, Purpose” vision. For instance, a discussion about persistent absence is no longer just about tracking numbers; it’s about intentionally exploring how we can deepen student connection to the school to foster their sense of purpose, thus impacting attendance. We might explicitly ask, “What specific interventions will elevate the intentionality of student presence, beyond mere punitive measures?” This simple reframing has transformed our dialogue from problem-solving to proactive vision-building.

One anecdote that vividly illustrates this was a conversation with a teacher struggling with a particularly challenging class. Her frustration was palpable. Instead of offering a quick fix, I intentionally steered the conversation to her “why” – why she became a teacher, what she genuinely believed about every child’s potential. We discussed how to intentionally re-engage those disaffected students, not just manage their behaviour. This led to her designing a project-based learning unit that allowed for greater student autonomy, a direct outcome of our intentional shift in focus. The ‘Who Am I?’ guide, in this context, serves as my personal score, ensuring my actions are consistently aligned with the values I espouse, making my leadership predictable and trustworthy.

Exercise for Leaders: The Intentional Agenda

For your next team meeting, review the agenda. For each item, ask yourself:

  • What is the specific, desired outcome of this discussion/decision?
  • How does this item align with our team’s/organisation’s overarching vision or values?
  • What intentional actions will we commit to as a result of this meeting?

Share this refined agenda with your team beforehand, framing the meeting around these intentional questions. Observe how it changes the quality of discussion and decision-making.

The Persistent Dissonance: Combatting Complacency as a Continuous Practice

Even in a school deemed ‘Good,’ the insidious creep of complacency is the persistent dissonance that threatens to mute the symphony. It’s the comfortable inertia, the quiet acceptance of ‘good enough,’ or the subtle belief that past successes guarantee future triumphs. Combatting this isn’t a one-off battle; it’s a continuous, vigilant practice, a willingness to embrace healthy disruption.

I’ve learned that complacency often masquerades as efficiency. “That’s how we always do it” can be a siren song, lulling us into routines that, while functional, may no longer be optimal. An example of this emerged when reviewing our pastoral referral system. It was “working,” but upon closer inspection, it wasn’t truly capturing the nuances of student need; it was more of a data collection exercise than a proactive intervention tool. Challenging this status quo felt uncomfortable, especially for staff accustomed to the routine. There was a palpable “dissonance” – a resistance to change that was rooted in comfort, not malice.

My approach, echoing Kurt Lewin’s ‘unfreezing’ concept, was not to dismantle it immediately, but to highlight the opportunity cost of complacency. I presented anonymized student narratives, illustrating how the current system was failing to connect the dots for our most vulnerable learners. This created a new kind of discomfort – the dissonance of seeing a known problem persist when a better way was possible. We engaged in a series of “critical friends” sessions, inviting external leaders to review our processes, which provided an objective mirror. It wasn’t about finding fault, but about intentionally seeking the friction that sparks innovation. We asked, “Where is our comfort holding us back from truly serving every child?”

Reflection for Leaders: Diagnosing Complacency

  • Identify an area in your team or organisation that is considered “good enough” but perhaps not “excellent.” What subtle signs of complacency can you observe (e.g., lack of innovation, resistance to new ideas, reliance on past successes, absence of critical self-reflection)?
  • How might you intentionally introduce “dissonance” or healthy disruption to challenge this complacency? Consider using external perspectives, data analysis, or a structured “what if” exercise.
  • What fears or anxieties might you or your team experience when asked to challenge established, comfortable norms? How can you create a psychologically safe environment for this necessary discomfort?

The Crescendo of Collective Potential: Championing Growth and Evolution for All

The Third Movement builds into a dynamic crescendo: ‘Championing Growth and Evolution’ for every individual and for the collective Team Saltley. It’s about moving beyond simply supporting development to actively cultivating an environment where potential is recognized, nurtured, and unleashed, leading to a flourishing ensemble.

This has been particularly vital in empowering our middle leaders, the “lifeboats” of the school, as I’ve previously described them. I recall a specific conversation with a Head of Department who, for years, had been incredibly effective within her silo. She was a master of her subject, but hesitant to step into broader school leadership. My challenge to her, framed within our ‘four movements’ philosophy, was to Champion Growth and Evolution not just for her department, but for her person within the wider school. I explicitly invited her to lead a cross-departmental initiative focusing on interdisciplinary projects, an area she felt less confident in but was passionate about. This was a deliberate act of distributed leadership, aligning with Alma Harris’s emphasis on dispersing leadership responsibilities.

The growth wasn’t linear. There were moments of doubt, setbacks where the project felt overwhelming. But my role, as the leader championing her growth, was to provide the ‘scaffolding and unwavering support,’ as described in my early Saltley reflections. I didn’t solve her problems; I provided the “philosopher in the cupboard” space for her to bounce ideas, receive affirmation, and, crucially, find her own route back to success. Witnessing her present the successful outcomes of that project to the entire staff was a profound moment – a true crescendo of collective potential where her individual growth ignited a broader sense of possibility within the team.

This also means fostering an environment where failures are seen not as endpoints, but as opportunities for learning. We’ve introduced ‘Learning Loops’ in our professional development, where teams reflect on initiatives, identify what worked and what didn’t, and, most importantly, articulate the ‘next iteration.’ This cultivates a mindset that is constantly evolving, embracing the “messiness” of change that Michael Fullan describes. It means the “second fiddle” can become a soloist in their own right, and the entire orchestra benefits from the expanded talent.

Exercise for Leaders: The Growth Trajectory

  • Identify one team member who you believe has untapped leadership potential. Design a specific, time-bound project or responsibility that would challenge them to grow beyond their current role.
  • During this project, consciously practice “coaching for leaders”: ask open-ended questions, offer resources, provide a safe space for reflection on challenges, and celebrate small victories. Resist the urge to fix problems for them.
  • After the project, conduct a debrief focused on their personal growth, their learning from setbacks, and how this experience has shaped their leadership capabilities.

The Resonant Harmony: Inspiring Deeper Connection

At the very heart of the symphony, of any thriving human system, is ‘Inspiring Deeper Connection.’ This is the resonant harmony that binds individuals into a cohesive whole, transforming a collection of parts into a powerful, unified force. In education, this means fostering genuine relationships – between students, between staff, and between the school and its wider community.

The ‘Trojan Horse affair’ had left its indelible mark at Saltley, not just suspicion of leadership, but perhaps a subtle fragmentation within the staff. My initial commitment to ‘listening intently and without judgment’ was the first note in rebuilding this connection. I remember a particularly moving conversation with a long-serving teacher, her voice etched with the weariness of past battles. She shared stories of the school’s resilience, but also the lingering sense of being misunderstood by outsiders. Instead of offering solutions, I simply validated her experience, acknowledging the pain and the unwavering dedication that had kept her there. That raw act of empathetic listening, of truly “seeing” her, forged a deeper connection than any policy document ever could. It was an instance of the ‘Trust Equation’ playing out, building intimacy through vulnerability.

This translates into daily practices. Our ‘All adults at Saltley Academy are pastoral leaders’ initiative was, at its core, a call to ‘Inspire Deeper Connection.’ It wasn’t just about enforcing rules, but about every adult recognizing their role in fostering a sense of belonging for every child. Actions like ‘meet and greet from the door’ are simple, yet powerful rituals of connection, ensuring every student feels seen and acknowledged from the moment they arrive. Similarly, the ‘Unseen Contract of Our Houses’ seeks to build community through Scanlonian principles, where belonging is fostered through justifiability to others, and connection thrives through mutual recognition and respect.

The ‘RSA Pinball Kids’ report became a shared lens through which to discuss empathy and the systemic need for strong relationships with trusted adults. It reinforced that preventing exclusion isn’t about isolated interventions, but about a pervasive culture of connection, ensuring no child feels like a “pinball” bounced around a system that doesn’t care.

Reflection for Leaders: Cultivating Connection

  • Think about a recent interaction where you felt a profound sense of connection with a colleague, student, or parent. What elements contributed to that feeling?
  • What intentional actions can you take this week to foster deeper connections within your immediate team? Consider active listening, sharing a personal (but appropriate) anecdote, or offering genuine appreciation for someone’s contribution.
  • How can you model vulnerability and authenticity to build greater trust within your team, creating psychological safety for others to connect more deeply?

The Enduring Motif: Scars and the Steel

The ‘Scars and the Steel’ are not static backdrops; they are the enduring motif, the persistent bass line that underpins the entire symphony. The emotional damage of witnessing systemic failure at Tile Cross, the brutal sting of the missed Headship – these are not just memories but lived experiences that continue to shape the very fibre of my leadership at Saltley.

The psychological toll of that Headship failure, the ‘seismic tremor’ that questioned my very worth, forced a brutal inventory. Yet, it was in that introspection, that ‘Adagio’ of personal reassessment, that the ‘steel’ was truly forged. I learned that dedication alone, while a powerful engine, is not enough. It requires a shrewd awareness of organizational politics, an understanding of the intricate dance between individual effort and systemic forces, and a profound resilience to absorb blows and continue the fight. This personal crucible has gifted me a unique lens: a deeper empathy for those who feel unseen, undervalued, or overlooked. When a colleague expresses frustration about a perceived injustice, I hear the echoes of my own past; my response is tempered by that hard-won understanding, allowing me to lead with both compassion and strategic resolve.

I confess, the ‘fading echo’ of enthusiasm can still make an appearance, particularly when confronted with familiar patterns of inertia or resistance. Yet, the ‘Four Movements’—Elevate Intentionality, Combat Complacency, Champion Growth and Evolution, and Inspire Deeper Connection—serve as my personal compass for re-engagement. When I feel that subtle drift towards apathy, I consciously invoke the mantra: “With intention, I choose a spark. Against complacency, I seek a small challenge. For growth, I embrace a tiny step forward. Through connection, I offer a moment of presence.” This is my ‘mantra or prayer,’ a daily act of recalibration to reignite the inner fire.

The struggle with the ‘second fiddle’ identity persists, a quiet counterpoint in the symphony. Am I destined to always be the unsung harmony? The analysis of the Deputy Head as the “orchestra’s second violin” resonates profoundly. It speaks to the vital, indispensable contribution that is often felt more than seen, the harmonic foundation that allows the main melody to soar. My aim is not to escape this role, but to master it, to wield that second violin with such precision and power that its contribution is undeniable, a quiet revolution of profound impact. This involves accepting the unique demands of this position, leveraging my influence to strengthen the collective, rather than seeking the spotlight.

Reflection for Leaders: Embracing the Scars

  • How do your past professional or personal “scars” manifest in your current leadership? Are they sources of wisdom, triggers for defensiveness, or both?
  • What is your personal “mantra” or daily practice for reigniting your enthusiasm or recalibrating your perspective when faced with setbacks or the mundane?
  • Consider the concept of being a ‘second fiddle’ or ‘second violin’ in your context. How can you leverage this position to provide essential “harmonic foundation” and drive, even when not carrying the primary melodic line?

The Final Cadenza: Legacy and Future

The Final Cadenza of this Fourth Movement looks beyond the immediate, towards the legacy of this symphony and its enduring future. It is not about a definitive end, but about the profound resonance that continues long after the final note, the impact that transcends my direct involvement.

My ultimate aim is to cultivate a self-sustaining ‘Team Saltley,’ where the ‘Four Movements’ are not merely my guiding principles but deeply ingrained in the collective ethos. I envision a school where ‘Elevated Intentionality’ is practiced by every leader, from the classroom to the boardroom, ensuring every decision is purposeful and aligned. I see a culture where ‘Combatting Complacency’ is a shared responsibility, where healthy challenge and continuous improvement are celebrated, not feared. I aspire to a system where ‘Championing Growth and Evolution’ is a systemic imperative, where every student and staff member is empowered to reach their full potential, and where leadership capacity is organically developed at every level, ensuring a robust pipeline for the future. And most importantly, I dream of a community where ‘Deeper Connection’ is the very fabric of daily life, fostering profound trust, empathy, and a shared sense of belonging for all.

This requires preparing leaders for what I term the “third movement” – a future demanding agility, distributed responsibility, and a deep sense of collective purpose. The forthcoming leadership away day is a crucial crucible for this: a space to liberate us from “Team Previous” habits and allow new leaders to shine. My role now is less about conducting every instrument and more about ensuring the orchestra understands the score, trusts each other, and possesses the collective will to play on, even when the conductor’s baton is passed.

My legacy, then, won’t be defined by titles or individual achievements, but by the collective’s strength and resilience. It’s about empowering others to compose their own compelling movements, to lead with courage, empathy, and integrity. It’s about ensuring that the ‘Alchemy of Belief’—the forging of a post-traumatic pedagogy from a crucible of thinkers and lived experience—continues to transform lives long after my direct involvement.

The ‘Siren Song of Self,’ the pervasive consumerism that threatens to eclipse citizenship, remains a significant challenge. My commitment, as outlined in my meta-commentary on Birmingham, is to foster citizens, not just consumers. This means instilling critical thinking, empathy, and a profound understanding that their role extends far beyond the marketplace. This is the ultimate purpose of this symphony: to help compose a more just, connected, and flourishing society—one child, one leader, one intentional act at a time.

The ‘Echo of Pala,’ Aldous Huxley’s utopian vision of intentionality, mindfulness, and growth, resonates as my distant North Star. My belief in ‘I Fall in Love with You Every Day’ is the enduring commitment to this ideal, a daily recommitment to seeing anew, appreciating nuances, and consciously strengthening the bonds that define our existence. It is the wisdom gained through ‘The Unseen Curriculum’ of John Berger and the ‘Black Box of Learning’ of Dylan Wiliam: to see beyond the metrics, peer into the human story, and demystify the learning process.

The ‘Alchemy of Belief’ continues, drawing from the stark societal critiques of Marx and Curtis, the neurobiological insights of Zak, the humanistic wisdom of Berger and Katz, and the practical strategies of Wiliam and Taylor. This eclectic mix is my crucible, continually refining my post-traumatic pedagogy, seeking holistic understanding, healing, and resonance.

The final act of any great symphony is not just about bringing the music to a close, but about creating an indelible impression, a resonance that lingers in the listener’s soul long after the final chord fades. My aspiration is that this unfolding symphony of leadership and learning leaves such a resonance. That the principles of ‘Elevate Intentionality,’ ‘Combat Complacency,’ ‘Champion Growth and Evolution,’ and ‘Inspire Deeper Connection’ become the very fabric of Saltley Academy. That the dedication to ‘The Adult Imperative,’ the insistence on ‘The High Press,’ and the wisdom gleaned from ‘The Unseen Contract of Our Houses’ are not merely strategies but deeply embedded cultural practices.

The journey of school improvement is, as I’ve confessed, a “relentless, often brutal, reckoning.” The ‘Scars and the Steel’ forged in Tile Cross continue to inform my path. The ‘Dark Triad’ of destructive habits serves as a constant reminder of the shadow side of leadership, against which my ‘Four Movements’ are the potent antidote.

The ‘Second Movement’ of personal disappointment, the ‘melancholy’ of the missed Headship, had to be embraced, but it also had to end. It was the necessary dissonance that led to a richer harmony. The “crossroads” of whether to be explicit about my personal reflections or to keep the focus solely on “them” has, I hope, found its resolution in this unfolding narrative. My journey is not separate from theirs; it is an “unfolding symphony” where my growth harmonizes with theirs, an “obligato” enriching the whole.

The ‘Art of Smiling Through Gritted Teeth’ in communication, the careful balancing act of transparency and empathy amidst flux, will remain a constant practice. It is the recognition that leading change is an act of emotional diplomacy, guiding the ship forward while acknowledging the very human discomfort of the journey.

And so, the commitment deepens. The decision to stay at Saltley, initially a “tentative dip,” has solidified into something profound. It’s about seeing the long-term impact of subtle cultural shifts, the gradual improvement in student lives and staff well-being. It’s about embracing the opportunity to cultivate a truly collaborative leadership team, united by a shared vision.

This concludes the “overture” to my next stage of deep introspection and development. My journey continues, not as a linear ascent, but as a circular dance of learning, adapting, and growing. The fight for better outcomes for the children of Birmingham remains the unwavering north star, now pursued with a more tempered idealism, but with an even deeper resolve forged in the crucible of personal experience. The “Alchemy of Adaptation” continues, where emotional intelligence is refined and applied with greater precision and wisdom. The leadership is not about a destination, but a continuous journey, a persistent “falling in love every day.”

Reflection for Leaders: Composing Your Legacy

  • The Unwritten Movements: What “movements” are yet to unfold in your leadership journey or in your team’s development? How can you proactively begin to compose them?
  • Legacy Beyond Title: If your leadership were a symphony, what enduring “resonance” would you want it to leave in the lives of those you lead and serve? How can your daily actions contribute to that desired legacy?
  • The Symphony’s Continuation: How are you actively preparing your team or organisation to continue its “symphony” of purpose and growth, even if you are no longer the primary conductor? What steps can you take to foster truly distributed and self-sustaining leadership?
  • Personal and Professional Harmony: How do you actively ensure your personal values and growth remain harmonized with your professional leadership? What practices help you integrate your inner self with your outer impact?

A Personal Cadenza: Beyond Prediction, Towards Catharsis

This concluding movement, the Finale of my leadership symphony, finds its true purpose not in predicting the future, but in a deeper, more profound act: personal catharsis. The words laid bare within these pages are not a strategic blueprint for what comes next for Philip Edmundson or Saltley Academy. Instead, they are the very act of processing, of understanding, of a leader grappling with his own human experience in the relentless, often brutal, reckoning that is school improvement. This has been a deeply introspective journey, a necessary self-excavation to understand my own perceived failings and, in doing so, to illuminate the genuine strengths that have emerged from their shadows.

The ‘Scars and the Steel’ that inform my leadership are not merely abstract concepts; they are the lived realities of exhaustion, disappointment, and the stark recognition of professional vulnerability. The initial desire to ‘fix’ everything, the impatience for immediate results that often characterized my earlier Tile Cross years, were indeed failings. They led to moments where I might have been overly direct, perhaps even dismissive of slower, more organic processes, driven by an almost visceral need to prove worth. The sting of the missed Headship, in particular, forced an unflinching mirror onto these aspects of my character. It revealed an ego bruised by unmet aspiration, and a reliance on sheer dedication that, while powerful, was insufficient on its own. Yet, in confronting these very limitations, a new kind of strength was forged. The ‘Adagio’ of personal reassessment taught me the quiet power of the pause, transforming that initial impatience into strategic patience, that need for control into a profound trust in others’ capabilities. It allowed the latent strengths of empathy—honed from my own complex background—to truly flourish, offering a deeper understanding of those who feel unseen or undervalued. My resilience, previously a raw, almost frantic survival mechanism, matured into a grounded presence, able to remain calm amidst the storm, trusting in the collective, rather than feeling solely responsible for carrying the weight. This writing, then, is the very act of forging that steel, of processing the heat and pressure of past experiences into a refined and purposeful leadership. It is my internal monologue made visible, a testament to the fact that genuine growth stems from an honest appraisal of our imperfections.

The Orchestral Score Shared: Collaboration Through Anonymity

If this narrative is a personal cadenza, then its sharing is a profound gesture of collaboration through anonymity. This is not a memoir published for personal accolade, nor a prescriptive guide to be followed blindly. Instead, it is an offering – a piece of my professional and personal score, anonymously shared, inviting others to find echoes of their own journeys, to draw parallels, and to engage in a deeper, more honest dialogue about the realities of leading and teaching in education. It is a quiet call for a more “graduate profession” view of our work.

Like any established profession – medicine, law, engineering – education is complex, nuanced, and inherently human. Yet, unlike some, it often lacks consistent, safe spaces for vulnerability, for the candid discussion of not just successes, but also the messy, challenging, and sometimes deeply disheartening failures. My intent in sharing these reflections, stripped of the immediate context of my personal identity, is to contribute to a collective wisdom. Imagine a vast orchestra where individual musicians, after a performance, don’t just critique the final sound, but openly share their practice routines, their struggles with difficult passages, their moments of doubt, and their strategies for mastering their instrument. This is the essence of what I advocate: a professional dialogue in education where insights are valued for their substance, for their capacity to illuminate common challenges and shared solutions, rather than being filtered through the lens of individual reputation or hierarchy.

This approach is about demystifying leadership. It’s about pulling back the curtain on the often-private struggles that every leader faces, regardless of their title. When we, as educators, are willing to engage in such authentic, vulnerable self-reflection and share it (even anonymously), we create a culture where learning from experience becomes a collective endeavour. It normalizes the struggles, celebrates the resilience, and builds a powerful foundation of mutual respect and understanding. This collective learning, born from shared introspection, is a far more potent force for professional growth than any top-down directive or external audit. It elevates our craft from a series of individual performances to a truly collaborative and continuously improving symphony of professional practice. It underscores that we are not lone conductors, but part of an ensemble, where each part, each personal score, enriches the collective masterpiece.

The Symphony’s Invulnerability: An Internal Fortification

What happens next for me, or for Saltley, is ultimately a continuation of this unfolding process, not a final purpose of this writing. The true purpose lies in fortifying the very profession of education. For far too long, our educational “symphony” has been buffeted by the “dissonances” of external forces: the ever-shifting sands of government dogma, the capricious winds of civil service directives, the unpredictable gusts of political whim, and the profound, often challenging, shifts in cultural baggage within our 21st-century British society. These are constant threats, capable of muting our harmonies, fragmenting our efforts, and ultimately, undermining our core purpose. The only way we can make the profession truly invulnerable to these slings and arrows requires an internal fortification, a cultivation of unwavering strength from within.

This invulnerability is composed of three interconnected elements: personal renewal, professional resilience, and an unwavering dedication to the cause.

  • Personal Renewal as an Inner Cadenza: At the heart of this fortification lies the individual educator, the single instrument in the vast orchestra. The ‘fading echo’ of enthusiasm, that subtle drift towards apathy, is a constant threat in a demanding profession. My belief in ‘I Fall in Love with You Every Day’ is more than a mantra; it is my daily act of personal renewal, a conscious recommitment to seeing anew, to appreciating the nuances in every child, every lesson, every interaction. This involves deliberate self-care, a recalibration of perspective when faced with setbacks, and a relentless pursuit of the passion that first drew me to this calling. It is the understanding that my personal well-being is not a luxury but a prerequisite for sustained leadership. When individual educators are renewed, when their inner cadenza is vibrant and strong, they form an impervious shield against disillusionment and burnout, ensuring their instrument remains finely tuned despite external pressures.
  • Professional Resilience as Collective Fortissimo: The ‘Scars and the Steel’ forged in Tile Cross, the brutal sting of the missed Headship – these are not just my personal experiences, but a microcosm of the challenges every educator faces in various forms. Professional resilience is the collective ability of the profession to absorb these shocks, to learn from systemic failings, and to share strategies for navigating adversity without being broken. My ‘Four Movements’—Elevate Intentionality, Combat Complacency, Champion Growth and Evolution, and Inspire Deeper Connection—become not just my personal compass, but a collective operational framework. When these principles are deeply ingrained in the ethos of Team Saltley, they provide an internal stability and adaptability that resists external imposition. ‘The Adult Imperative,’ ‘The High Press,’ and the ‘Unseen Contract of Our Houses,’ initially conceived as practical strategies, are ultimately expressions of an internally driven commitment to excellence that stands firm against external pressures. They are the collective fortissimo, a unified response that declares the profession’s unwavering commitment to its own standards, regardless of the political climate.
  • Dedication to the Cause as the Unwavering Bass Line: The most profound anchor against external whims and shifting tides is an unwavering dedication to the cause itself. My deeply ingrained conviction for social mobility, for ensuring that every child in Birmingham—regardless of their complex background—has the equitable opportunity to flourish, is the unwavering bass line that underpins this entire symphony. This moral imperative, this North Star, provides an intrinsic motivation that transcends fleeting political trends or narrow, metric-driven agendas. It is the ‘Alchemy of Belief’ continuing, driven by an inherent purpose that is far deeper than external recognition or compliance. When the collective dedication of the profession to its core moral purpose is absolute, it creates an internal gravity that pulls all efforts towards true student flourishing, making it fundamentally impervious to distractions and manipulations from outside forces. The profession, like a perfectly tuned, self-regulating orchestra, becomes so focused on perfecting its internal harmony and achieving its inherent purpose that, while aware of external storms, it remains unyielding, able to weather major tempests and continue its vital composition.

The Concluding Movement: A Perpetual Overture

And so, the journey continues, not as a linear ascent towards a final destination, but as a circular dance of learning, adapting, and growing. This symphony is never truly finished; it is always composing itself, each challenge a new motif, each resolution a fresh harmony. My reflections, my “movements,” are not a grand pronouncement, but a perpetual overture to what is always coming next—the ongoing work, the deepening commitment, and the relentless pursuit of educational justice.

The fight for better outcomes for the children of Birmingham remains the unwavering north star, now pursued with a more tempered idealism, but with an even deeper resolve forged in the crucible of personal experience. The “Alchemy of Adaptation” continues, where emotional intelligence is refined and applied with greater precision and wisdom. This leadership is not about a destination, but a continuous journey, a persistent “falling in love every day.”

For the reader, for every leader, for every educator, this narrative is an invitation. An invitation to engage in your own profound act of reflection, to consider your own unwritten movements. What movements are yet to unfold in your leadership journey or in your team’s development? How can you proactively begin to compose them? What enduring resonance would you want your leadership symphony to leave in the lives of those you lead and serve? How are you actively preparing your team or organization to continue its symphony of purpose and growth, even if you are no longer the primary conductor? And how do you actively ensure your personal values and growth remain harmonized with your professional leadership, integrating your inner self with your outer impact?

May your own symphonies of purpose and resilience play on, inspiring profound change, one intentional act at a time.

Tagged , , , ,