Subscribe to continue reading
Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.
Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.
In March 2025, the government released their initial findings on the Curriculum and Assessment Review, a link to my synthesis written in March is here: C&A interim educational landscape the current provision March 2025.pdf The UK government’s Curriculum and Assessment Review is being led by Professor Becky Francis CBE.
She is the Chief Executive of the Education Endowment Foundation and an expert in education policy, particularly regarding curriculum and social inequality. She chairs a panel of experts who are working on the review. An interim report was published in March 2025, with the final report and recommendations expected in autumn 2025.
As July gentle fades into August and the beginning of a proper shutdown for this authentic leader – this is me attempting to be more Lyme Regis, it feels like I must get a few matters out of my mind, partly to allow the Lyme Regis and partly to lay down some plans on what we must do next.
Strategic Priorities
The recent Educational Landscape Review has illuminated critical areas demanding urgent attention from education leaders. Far from being a mere critique, the review serves as a roadmap for future-proofing our educational system, ensuring it remains equitable, relevant, and effective for all learners. In the coming months, leaders must proactively address the identified disparities, curriculum imbalances, and structural weaknesses to prepare for the inevitable changes these insights will precipitate. This involves a multi-faceted approach focused on fostering equitable access, refining curriculum, enhancing future relevance, and strengthening post-16 provisions, all while cultivating a culture of adaptability and continuous improvement.
Firstly, addressing the persistent disparities in equitable access and outcomes, particularly for disadvantaged and SEND learners, must be paramount. While the knowledge-rich curriculum has yielded overall attainment improvements, its impact has not been uniformly positive. Education leaders need to move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach and embed a robust social justice lens across all educational practices. This means scrutinising existing support systems and designing targeted interventions that genuinely elevate aspirations and equip every learner with the skills and confidence for life and work. In the coming months, this will entail a thorough audit of current provisions for these groups, engaging with their families and communities to understand their unique needs, and allocating resources strategically to bridge attainment gaps. Professional development for staff on inclusive pedagogies and differentiated instruction will be crucial to ensure all teachers are equipped to support diverse learners effectively.
Secondly, the review’s findings on curriculum structure and content necessitate a bold re-evaluation of what and how we teach. The tension between breadth and depth, the primary curriculum overload, and the premature narrowing of KS3 due to early GCSE preparation are undermining foundational learning and fostering disengagement. Education leaders must initiate a comprehensive review of curriculum sequencing across all key stages, prioritising mastery of core concepts over superficial coverage. For Key Stages 1 and 2, this means advocating for a streamlined curriculum that allows for deeper exploration of foundational literacy and numeracy. At Key Stage 3, leaders must champion a curriculum that maintains its breadth, encourages intellectual curiosity, and avoids rote repetition, allowing students to genuinely engage with subjects before specialization. The ongoing review of EBacc constraints demands close attention, and leaders should be prepared to advocate for reforms that promote a child’s choice and a more balanced curriculum. I would go further and argue that the curriculum from Key Stage 3 to Key Stage 4 must evolve from broad and balanced and become ‘Developed and Divergent’.
This period requires proactive collaboration with teachers to identify areas for curriculum refinement and to pilot new approaches that foster deeper learning.
Thirdly, ensuring curriculum relevance for future needs is no longer an option but a necessity. The call for modernisation to reflect digital literacy, sustainability, and global challenges, alongside addressing subject-specific imbalances and vagueness, signals a need for significant curricular evolution. Education leaders must champion the integration of 21st-century skills and global competencies across all subjects, moving beyond outdated content. This will require investing in teacher training for new pedagogical approaches and digital tools. Furthermore, the imperative to reflect diverse identities and broaden pupils’ horizons within the curriculum must be taken seriously. This is not just about representation but about fostering a more inclusive and globally aware citizenry. In the coming months, engaging with external experts, industry leaders, and community groups will be vital to inform these curricular updates and ensure their practical relevance.
Finally, the review’s insights into 16-19 provisions and qualifications highlight systemic issues that demand immediate attention. While A-levels retain their strength, the lack of clarity and instability in vocational pathways are causing poor outcomes for a significant cohort of learners. Education leaders must work collaboratively with further education colleges, employers, and policymakers to establish clearer, more valued vocational routes that genuinely prepare students for the workforce. The acknowledged failure of the GCSE re-sit policy for English and Maths underscores the need for a more nuanced approach to supporting these learners. Furthermore, while SATs have value, concerns about grammar and writing assessments impacting literacy development warrant a careful re-evaluation. The impending review of GCSE reform, particularly regarding exam stress and assessment volume, offers an opportunity for leaders to advocate for a more holistic and less high-stakes assessment system that genuinely measures learning. This period calls for strong advocacy and practical solutions to create a more diverse and effective post-16 landscape.
The Educational Landscape Review presents a formidable yet exciting challenge for education leaders in the coming months. The identified key points are not isolated issues but interconnected threads that weave the fabric of our educational system. By prioritising equitable access, rigorously refining curriculum, championing future relevance, and strengthening post-16 provisions, leaders can proactively shape the evolution of education. This will require courageous decision-making, collaborative spirit, and an unwavering commitment to putting the needs of all learners at the heart of every reform. The coming months are a crucial period for laying the groundwork for a more just, responsive, and effective education system for generations to come.
Our first, and perhaps most resonant, chord must be struck in the realm of equitable access and outcomes. The knowledge-rich curriculum, while yielding overall attainment improvements, has revealed persistent disparities, casting a spotlight on our disadvantaged and SEND learners. This is a call to “truly see” beyond the metrics to the human stories. Leaders must move beyond programmatic fixes, embedding a social justice lens so deeply that it becomes an intrinsic part of our educational DNA. This means a daily recommitment, a “fall in love with you every day” philosophy, to the vital connections with every student, ensuring high aspirations are not just words but lived realities. In the coming months, this demands a self-reflective audit of current support systems, engaging in open dialogue with families and communities to understand their unique needs, and allocating resources with discerning strategic patience. Professional development must become a crucible for inclusive pedagogies, empowering every educator to navigate the intricate emotional landscapes of their classrooms.
Secondly, the very architecture of our curriculum, its structure and content, demands an intellectual alchemy. The tension between breadth and depth, the overwhelming deluge of the primary curriculum, and the premature narrowing of Key Stage 3 are not mere administrative challenges; they are impediments to genuine mastery and intellectual curiosity. Education leaders must orchestrate a dynamic interplay of intention and action. This means meticulously planning and defining a culture where foundational concepts are mastered, not merely touched upon. For Key Stages 1 and 2, the imperative is a streamlined curriculum that allows for deeper exploration, much like the thoughtful cultivation envisioned in Huxley’s “Island”. At Key Stage 3, we must champion a curriculum that resists the pull of early specialization, preserving its breadth and fostering engagement. The ongoing review of EBacc constraints offers an opportunity for leaders to advocate for reforms that prioritise children’s choice and curriculum balance, recognising that a truly rich education is a symphony, not a monotone. This period requires proactive collaboration with teachers, nurturing their potential, and empowering them as the “lifeboats” of the school.
Thirdly, the relevance of our curriculum for future needs is a profound imperative. A knowledge-rich foundation remains vital, but it must be a living, evolving entity, reflecting the digital complexities, the sustainability challenges, and the global interconnectedness of our world. Leaders must relentlessly combat complacency, challenging the status quo by integrating 21st-century skills and global competencies across all subjects. This is about enriching the soil of our educational landscape so that diverse identities can flourish and childrens’ horizons are broadened beyond measure.
In essence, the Educational Landscape Review is a perpetual overture to ongoing work, a deepening commitment to educational justice. For education leaders in the coming months, it is a call to embody authentic leadership: to elevate intentionality, combat complacency, champion growth, and inspire deeper connection. By embracing these movements, we can ensure that the “Alchemy of Belief” continues to transform lives, one intentional act at a time, building a resilient, compassionate, and truly authentic education system.
Pathway 1: Be Clear About What We’re Doing – Our School’s Heartbeat
Pathway 2: Don’t Just Stick to the Old Ways – Look for What’s Missing
Pathway 3: Help Everyone Grow – Empowering Our Key People
Pathway 4: Build Stronger Connections – Creating a Supportive Community
Finally, embrace the “Perpetual Overture”: Recognise that leadership is not about a final destination, but a “perpetual overture” to ongoing work. This mindset encourages continuous improvement and a deepening commitment, allowing for adaptability in the face of evolving challenges.
And with that, there will be a round up for subscribers in the next couple of days and I will be back around results week. In many respects I hope you are re-visiting this after a good, restful and well-earned break. For me, the rest comes when I have cleared and sorted my mind into the right boxes, ready for moving onto the next academic year.
Requiesce et otium sume.
The Key Stage 4 (KS4) curriculum in England is a complex and vital composition, orchestrating the learning journey of young people through two formative years. To truly capture its essence and the elements that elevate it to excellence, we can envision it as a four-movement symphony, each movement building upon the last to create a harmonious and impactful educational experience.
Movement I: Elevate Intentionality
The symphony begins by establishing a clear and purposeful direction, elevating the intentionality behind every aspect of the KS4 curriculum. This movement sets the foundational themes of a broad, balanced, and ambitious educational offering. It acknowledges the statutory requirements—the core pillars of English, Mathematics, and Science—which provide the essential academic bedrock. However, intentionality extends beyond mere compliance. It quickly expands to introduce the rich orchestration of subjects beyond these: the deep narratives of Humanities, the expressive colours of the Arts, the practical rhythms of Design and Technology, the logical structures of Computing, and the global melodies of Modern Foreign Languages. This opening movement declares that an excellent curriculum is not merely a list of subjects, but a comprehensive landscape meticulously designed to allow every student to discover their intellectual range and potential. This broad and balanced offering serves as the fertile ground, enabling a curriculum that is divergent and developed as the antidote and natural extension of a broad and balanced curriculum, ensuring every young learner has the opportunity to engage with and excel across a wide spectrum of knowledge with a clear purpose.
Movement II: Combat Complacency
Following the initial statement of intent, the symphony transitions into a movement dedicated to actively combating complacency in learning. This is where the true joy of learning finds its voice, forming the very heartbeat of an excellent KS4 curriculum, pushing beyond the mundane. It’s in this movement that we hear the quiet but profound resonance of a child experiencing the “aha!” moment—that sudden, illuminating spark of understanding when a complex concept resolves into clarity, shaking off any passive acceptance of information. Here, the curriculum actively fosters a sense of awe and wonder, whether through the intricate beauty of mathematical proofs, the breathtaking discoveries of scientific inquiry, or the emotional depth uncovered in a piece of literature. This movement celebrates the intrinsic motivation that blossoms from curiosity and intellectual satisfaction, a motivation far more powerful and sustainable than rote memorisation driven by exam pressure. Schools that master this movement create not just exam passers, but lifelong learners whose intellectual curiosity actively seeks out knowledge and continues to hum long after the final bell.
Movement III: Champion Growth and Evolution
The third movement, a dynamic and often intricate Scherzo, captures the active process of championing individual growth and the evolution of a student’s educational path. For students, the options process is akin to navigating a complex marketplace—their first significant foray into shaping their own educational destiny. This marketplace, with its array of academic, vocational, and technical qualifications, presents immense potential for students to choose pathways where they can genuinely thrive and evolve. It’s a moment of burgeoning independence, allowing them to sculpt their educational identity. Yet, like any complex market, it demands careful navigation. Without wise guidance, this newfound freedom can become overwhelming, leading to choices that may not align with long-term potential or genuine passion. The success of these crucial subject choices, and indeed the overall effectiveness of the KS4 curriculum, lies in a delicate interplay of influences. It sits somewhere between the ambitions of the child, fuelled by a newfound interest or a clear career goal; the influence of the parent, offering perspective and encouragement based on their understanding of their child’s strengths; and crucially, the success of the subject at Key Stage 3, providing the foundational experience and confidence for future growth. When these three elements align, the conditions for a student to truly thrive and evolve are optimally championed.
When the Centre Cannot Hold:
However, when the intentionality falters, complacency takes root, and the championing of growth is neglected, the KS4 curriculum can unravel. The “complex marketplace” of options transforms into a bewildering maze, where students, lacking wise guidance, make choices driven by fleeting trends, peer pressure, or a desperate attempt to avoid perceived weaknesses. The delicate interplay of ambition, parental influence, and Key Stage 3 success breaks down. A child’s true ambitions may be stifled by a narrow curriculum offer or a lack of understanding about future pathways. Parental influence, if uninformed or overly prescriptive, can steer a child towards unsuitable subjects, leading to disengagement and underachievement. Most critically, a weak foundation in Key Stage 3 subjects can leave students ill-equipped for the demands of GCSEs, leading to a sense of failure and a loss of confidence. In such scenarios, the “aha!” moments become rare, replaced by frustration and a growing disinterest in learning. The joy of discovery is extinguished, and the curriculum, instead of fostering growth, becomes a source of anxiety and disillusionment. When these elements fall apart, the centre of a truly excellent education cannot hold, and students are left adrift, ill-prepared for their future and disconnected from the profound potential of learning.
Movement IV: Inspire Deeper Connection
The symphony culminates in a powerful and unifying Finale, bringing together all the preceding themes into a cohesive whole that inspires deeper connection—to knowledge, to self, and to the wider world. This movement focuses on the holistic outcomes of an excellent KS4 curriculum, demonstrating how it prepares students for their future by fostering meaningful engagement. It’s about more than just qualifications; it’s about developing essential skills—communication, critical thinking, problem-solving, and teamwork—that are indispensable in an ever-evolving world and deepen a student’s connection to their capabilities. The Finale underscores the curriculum’s role in providing students with the knowledge and skills they need to progress confidently to further education, training, or employment, supported by high-quality careers guidance that helps them connect their learning to real-world opportunities. Ultimately, this concluding movement reveals that an excellent KS4 curriculum is a dynamic and responsive entity. It is ambitious in its academic rigour, broad in its offerings, deeply attentive to the individual needs and aspirations of each student, and committed to fostering intellectual curiosity, building resilience, and equipping young people with the confidence to navigate an ever-changing world. The true harmony of this symphony lies in its ability to ensure that the journey of learning remains a source of profound joy, discovery, and preparation for a fulfilling future, inspiring a deeper and lasting connection to all they have learned.
The Fading Echo and the Four Movements: Reclaiming the Daily Dawn of Enthusiasm
Reflecting on my recurring motifs, the daily renewal of connection and the conscious choice to embrace love anew – brings a poignant contrast to the experience of losing enthusiasm. Our narrative explores the deliberate act of reigniting passion, the intentionality required to nurture affection despite the predictable rhythm of life. But what happens when that initial spark, that inherent zest for the day and its possibilities, begins to fade? What does it feel like when the daily dawn, once anticipated with warmth, becomes a muted, grey affair? Everything I am writing here has an unseen backdrop – the psychodrama of being a husband and father; being middle aged and for some reason feeling rather surprised that not only does this trip off my tongue with alarming ease, but also micro stabs me when I see it on the page. I suppose, what if reclaiming the daily dawn of enthusiasm is an uphill struggle?
The loss of enthusiasm isn’t a sudden cataclysm; it’s a gradual erosion, a slow dimming of the internal flame. It begins with a subtle shift in perspective. The vibrant colours of the world seem to lose their saturation, the once-intriguing now feels commonplace. The anticipation that fuels action, the very energy that propels us to engage and create, starts to dissipate. It’s akin to the daily reset occurring not with a surge of fresh affection, but with a weary familiarity, a sense of déjà vu that breeds apathy rather than connection.
In this fading landscape, the Four Movements – Elevate Intentionality, Combat Complacency, Champion Growth and Evolution, and Inspire Deeper Connection – serve as both a supportive measure and a potent reminder of the active choices we can make to reclaim our inner spark.
Where intentionality once drove us towards engagement, its absence leaves a void filled by inertia. Elevate Intentionality reminds us that even the smallest act can be imbued with purpose. It prompts the question: What small, deliberate step can I take today that aligns with my values and brings a flicker of meaning? This movement provides a framework for consciously choosing our focus, even when motivation is low, guiding us away from passive drifting.
The “Combat Complacency” we discussed in the context of curriculum development mirrors the internal battle against a growing indifference. The once-challenging now feels insurmountable, and the comfort of the familiar, even if unfulfilling, becomes a siren song. Combat Complacency urges us to resist this pull. It whispers: Where have I become stagnant? What small challenge can I embrace today to disrupt this inertia and reignite my curiosity? This movement encourages us to actively seek novelty and push beyond the boundaries of our comfort zone, even in small ways.
The vibrant “Growth and Evolution” we championed transforms into a stagnant plateau. The curiosity that once propelled us to explore new ideas and experiences withers. The sense of personal progress, the feeling of moving forward, diminishes, replaced by a monotonous repetition of routine. Champion Growth and Evolution acts as a gentle nudge: What small act of learning or exploration can I commit to today, even if it feels insignificant? How can I cultivate a sense of forward momentum, however small? This movement reminds us that growth is a continuous process, and even small steps can break the cycle of stagnation.
Perhaps the most profound impact of lost enthusiasm is on our capacity for connection, the very heart of “I Fall in Love with You Every Day.” The initial joy in shared experiences, the spark of understanding and empathy, becomes harder to ignite. Conversations feel less engaging, interactions more perfunctory. The deeper connections we once cherished seem to require an effort we no longer possess, leading to a sense of isolation even within familiar relationships. Inspire Deeper Connection offers a guiding light: What small gesture of genuine connection can I offer today? How can I be truly present in my interactions, even when my inner spark feels dim? This movement emphasizes the reciprocal nature of connection and the potential for even small acts of kindness and engagement to rekindle our own enthusiasm.
A Potential Mantra or Prayer:
“With intention, I choose a spark. Against complacency, I seek a small challenge. For growth, I embrace a tiny step forward. Through connection, I offer a moment of presence.”
Losing enthusiasm is a quiet thief, stealing not grand possessions, but the subtle joys that colour our days. It’s the muted laughter, the half-hearted effort, the dimming of the inner light that once illuminated our path. It’s the antithesis of the daily reawakening of love we explore – instead of a conscious choice to connect, it’s a gradual drifting away, a fading echo of the vibrant self we once were. By consciously invoking the Four Movements, we can find a pathway back to that vibrant dawn, actively choosing to reignite our inner fire, much like the characters in our recurring narrative choose love, day after day.
Fleshing out the “How-To” of Divergence and Development in Practice: While I believe I’ve effectively introduced the concept of a divergent and developed curriculum, I recognise that the practical steps for achieving this could be elaborated. I could dedicate future posts to:
Deepening the “Inspire Deeper Connection” Movement for Curriculum: This movement touches on essential skills and careers guidance. I could explore this further by:
Integrating the Personal “Fading Echo” with Professional Application: My “Fading Echo” section is a powerful, vulnerable reflection on losing enthusiasm. I could connect this more directly to the process of leading curriculum change:
Suggestions I might offer to other authentic leaders wanting to create a Divergent and Developed Curriculum:
Elevate Intentionality in Curriculum Design:
Actively Combat Complacency in Learning:
Champion Growth and Evolution Through Thoughtful Pathways:
Inspire Deeper Connection (Holistic Outcomes and Future Preparedness):
In essence, my advice to other leaders would be to move beyond a checklist approach to curriculum design and instead adopt a holistic, intentional, and student-centred philosophy that prioritizes deep engagement, personal growth, and authentic connections, thereby naturally cultivating a truly divergent and developed educational experience.
[edited to add – written on 16th July 2025]
At first glance, the rigorous, often contentious world of OFSTED—with its meticulous frameworks and demanding criteria—seems far removed from the ancient, almost mystical elegance of the Golden Ratio. Represented by the Greek letter phi (ϕ), this irrational number, approximately 1.618, defines a unique proportional relationship: the ratio of the whole to the larger part is the same as the ratio of the larger part to the smaller. This mathematical harmony, closely linked to the Fibonacci sequence, manifests in nature—from sunflower spirals to nautilus shells—and has long inspired artists and architects, including Leonardo da Vinci, in their pursuit of aesthetic perfection. Imagine a line divided into two parts, ‘a’ and ‘b’, such that (a+b)/a=a/b. When this condition is met, the parts are said to be in the Golden Ratio.
Yet, in a subtly profound, if entirely metaphorical, sense, the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (OFSTED) is engaged in a perpetual quest for an “educational golden ratio.” This isn’t about literally measuring classroom dimensions for aesthetic delight; it’s about discerning, and indeed striving to mandate, the precise, harmonious balance that defines truly outstanding education and care.
OFSTED’s Architectural Blueprint
Consider the core tenets of OFSTED’s enduring mission, viewed through this peculiar lens. Its standards and quality assurance frameworks are not mere bureaucratic instruments; they are blueprints for educational excellence. Like a master builder seeking perfect proportions, OFSTED aims to define the ideal balance between safeguarding, pedagogy, leadership, and pupil outcomes. They are, in essence, crafting the architectural blueprints for optimal learning environments, much like a master builder meticulously designs a structure with perfect aesthetic balance, ensuring every component aligns to an exacting, elevated standard.
Inspections, then, are not just audits but acts of discernment. Inspectors are seeking that elusive, harmonious balance—the point where safeguarding, effective learning methodologies, and genuine pupil progress coalesce into a beautiful, eminently functional educational panorama. It is the discernment of whether the individual “parts” of an institution indeed sum to a truly “golden” whole for the children it serves. And accountability and improvement? This is the iterative, often demanding, process of continuous design refinement. Should any element prove “off-kilter,” OFSTED identifies these imbalances, providing the insights deemed necessary to adjust, course-correct, and thereby guide institutions closer to that optimal, almost perfect, state of educational excellence. Thus, while ϕ will never grace an official OFSTED report, their mission is, in a witty, metaphorical sense, to assist every educational setting in discovering and achieving its own “golden standard” of quality. It is less about mathematical beauty and more about the beautiful, profound outcome of a well-run, effective, and safe learning environment.
The Underpainting of Reform
As the educational landscape prepares for OFSTED’s revised inspection framework, the regulator has begun laying down a careful underpainting—a foundational wash to support a more considered rollout. This phased approach for the autumn term of 2025, with deliberately fewer inspections in November and December led exclusively by their most experienced personnel, aims to apply a gentle initial wash to the canvas, ensuring a steady foundation. External inspectors, like new colours introduced to a complex palette, will be phased in only after rigorous training and quality checks. This emphasis on training and quality assurance, extending even to senior inspectors participating in pilot inspections under direct OFSTED leadership, underscores a commitment to precision in every stroke.
Transparency and feedback mechanisms—random exit interviews, continued post-inspection surveys, and roundtable discussions—will offer a reflective counterbalance, akin to the interplay of light and shadow in a painting, seeking a broader, more comprehensive vista of the sector. Additional measures include avoiding inspections in the final week of term, a more robust system for deferral requests, co-developed guidance materials, and a dedicated helpline. Coupled with unprecedented public access to inspector training via the OFSTED Academy, all these initiatives strive to prevent discord in the brushstrokes, aiming to reduce friction and foster trust.
The Blurred Lines of Critique
However, despite these thoughtful and ostensibly judicious procedural adjustments, an independent critique from the sector introduces a persistent blurring of lines in the distant hues. A primary concern revolves around the sheer pace of the roll-out, which many perceive as unduly rushed, risking implementation before the canvas is truly prepared. There are urgent pleas for a more measured and genuinely collaborative approach, allowing schools and colleges the vital time to adapt, to truly internalize the new perspective—a call for strategic patience rather than a frantic application of paint.
Beyond mere speed, the very design of the framework itself continues to create a fundamental disharmony in the scene. The proposed five-point grading system, for instance, is widely viewed as fundamentally flawed, a design in need of deeper, more structural reform, not merely minor adjustments. Critics contend that procedural tweaks, while perhaps alleviating immediate friction, ultimately fail to address these underlying issues with the framework’s core principles. This isn’t merely a detached policy discussion; it’s the lived reality of institutions striving for transformation against a perceived misalignment in foundational “proportions.”
Toward a More Harmonious Future
Ultimately, the quest for true reassurance and trust transcends these operational refinements. Many believe genuine confidence will only emerge from a fundamental rethinking of the inspection model itself. There is a profound desire for more meaningful engagement with the sector, aiming to co-create a system that genuinely supports improvement and nurtures growth, rather than simply enforcing compliance. This echoes the need for a system rooted in principled, passionate, and genuinely present leadership.
As the autumn term approaches, all eyes will be fixed on how OFSTED’s announced measures translate into practice, and whether they can indeed bridge the gap between procedural improvements and the sectors deeply held desire for a more supportive and effective inspection system. The pursuit of this “educational golden ratio” is therefore less a definitive conclusion and more a perpetual underpainting—the ongoing work, the deepening commitment, and the relentless pursuit of an inspection system that truly serves its profound purpose of educational justice, thereby helping compose a more just, connected, and flourishing society.
School leaders should aim to achieve an “educational golden ratio” by focusing on a harmonious balance between safeguarding, pedagogy, leadership, and children’s outcomes.
This involves discerning how the individual parts of their institution contribute to a truly “golden” whole for the children it serves.
In practice, this means: