Subscribe to continue reading
Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.
Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.
In March 2025, the government released their initial findings on the Curriculum and Assessment Review, a link to my synthesis written in March is here: C&A interim educational landscape the current provision March 2025.pdf The UK government’s Curriculum and Assessment Review is being led by Professor Becky Francis CBE.
She is the Chief Executive of the Education Endowment Foundation and an expert in education policy, particularly regarding curriculum and social inequality. She chairs a panel of experts who are working on the review. An interim report was published in March 2025, with the final report and recommendations expected in autumn 2025.
As July gentle fades into August and the beginning of a proper shutdown for this authentic leader – this is me attempting to be more Lyme Regis, it feels like I must get a few matters out of my mind, partly to allow the Lyme Regis and partly to lay down some plans on what we must do next.
Strategic Priorities
The recent Educational Landscape Review has illuminated critical areas demanding urgent attention from education leaders. Far from being a mere critique, the review serves as a roadmap for future-proofing our educational system, ensuring it remains equitable, relevant, and effective for all learners. In the coming months, leaders must proactively address the identified disparities, curriculum imbalances, and structural weaknesses to prepare for the inevitable changes these insights will precipitate. This involves a multi-faceted approach focused on fostering equitable access, refining curriculum, enhancing future relevance, and strengthening post-16 provisions, all while cultivating a culture of adaptability and continuous improvement.
Firstly, addressing the persistent disparities in equitable access and outcomes, particularly for disadvantaged and SEND learners, must be paramount. While the knowledge-rich curriculum has yielded overall attainment improvements, its impact has not been uniformly positive. Education leaders need to move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach and embed a robust social justice lens across all educational practices. This means scrutinising existing support systems and designing targeted interventions that genuinely elevate aspirations and equip every learner with the skills and confidence for life and work. In the coming months, this will entail a thorough audit of current provisions for these groups, engaging with their families and communities to understand their unique needs, and allocating resources strategically to bridge attainment gaps. Professional development for staff on inclusive pedagogies and differentiated instruction will be crucial to ensure all teachers are equipped to support diverse learners effectively.
Secondly, the review’s findings on curriculum structure and content necessitate a bold re-evaluation of what and how we teach. The tension between breadth and depth, the primary curriculum overload, and the premature narrowing of KS3 due to early GCSE preparation are undermining foundational learning and fostering disengagement. Education leaders must initiate a comprehensive review of curriculum sequencing across all key stages, prioritising mastery of core concepts over superficial coverage. For Key Stages 1 and 2, this means advocating for a streamlined curriculum that allows for deeper exploration of foundational literacy and numeracy. At Key Stage 3, leaders must champion a curriculum that maintains its breadth, encourages intellectual curiosity, and avoids rote repetition, allowing students to genuinely engage with subjects before specialization. The ongoing review of EBacc constraints demands close attention, and leaders should be prepared to advocate for reforms that promote a child’s choice and a more balanced curriculum. I would go further and argue that the curriculum from Key Stage 3 to Key Stage 4 must evolve from broad and balanced and become ‘Developed and Divergent’.
This period requires proactive collaboration with teachers to identify areas for curriculum refinement and to pilot new approaches that foster deeper learning.
Thirdly, ensuring curriculum relevance for future needs is no longer an option but a necessity. The call for modernisation to reflect digital literacy, sustainability, and global challenges, alongside addressing subject-specific imbalances and vagueness, signals a need for significant curricular evolution. Education leaders must champion the integration of 21st-century skills and global competencies across all subjects, moving beyond outdated content. This will require investing in teacher training for new pedagogical approaches and digital tools. Furthermore, the imperative to reflect diverse identities and broaden pupils’ horizons within the curriculum must be taken seriously. This is not just about representation but about fostering a more inclusive and globally aware citizenry. In the coming months, engaging with external experts, industry leaders, and community groups will be vital to inform these curricular updates and ensure their practical relevance.
Finally, the review’s insights into 16-19 provisions and qualifications highlight systemic issues that demand immediate attention. While A-levels retain their strength, the lack of clarity and instability in vocational pathways are causing poor outcomes for a significant cohort of learners. Education leaders must work collaboratively with further education colleges, employers, and policymakers to establish clearer, more valued vocational routes that genuinely prepare students for the workforce. The acknowledged failure of the GCSE re-sit policy for English and Maths underscores the need for a more nuanced approach to supporting these learners. Furthermore, while SATs have value, concerns about grammar and writing assessments impacting literacy development warrant a careful re-evaluation. The impending review of GCSE reform, particularly regarding exam stress and assessment volume, offers an opportunity for leaders to advocate for a more holistic and less high-stakes assessment system that genuinely measures learning. This period calls for strong advocacy and practical solutions to create a more diverse and effective post-16 landscape.
The Educational Landscape Review presents a formidable yet exciting challenge for education leaders in the coming months. The identified key points are not isolated issues but interconnected threads that weave the fabric of our educational system. By prioritising equitable access, rigorously refining curriculum, championing future relevance, and strengthening post-16 provisions, leaders can proactively shape the evolution of education. This will require courageous decision-making, collaborative spirit, and an unwavering commitment to putting the needs of all learners at the heart of every reform. The coming months are a crucial period for laying the groundwork for a more just, responsive, and effective education system for generations to come.
Our first, and perhaps most resonant, chord must be struck in the realm of equitable access and outcomes. The knowledge-rich curriculum, while yielding overall attainment improvements, has revealed persistent disparities, casting a spotlight on our disadvantaged and SEND learners. This is a call to “truly see” beyond the metrics to the human stories. Leaders must move beyond programmatic fixes, embedding a social justice lens so deeply that it becomes an intrinsic part of our educational DNA. This means a daily recommitment, a “fall in love with you every day” philosophy, to the vital connections with every student, ensuring high aspirations are not just words but lived realities. In the coming months, this demands a self-reflective audit of current support systems, engaging in open dialogue with families and communities to understand their unique needs, and allocating resources with discerning strategic patience. Professional development must become a crucible for inclusive pedagogies, empowering every educator to navigate the intricate emotional landscapes of their classrooms.
Secondly, the very architecture of our curriculum, its structure and content, demands an intellectual alchemy. The tension between breadth and depth, the overwhelming deluge of the primary curriculum, and the premature narrowing of Key Stage 3 are not mere administrative challenges; they are impediments to genuine mastery and intellectual curiosity. Education leaders must orchestrate a dynamic interplay of intention and action. This means meticulously planning and defining a culture where foundational concepts are mastered, not merely touched upon. For Key Stages 1 and 2, the imperative is a streamlined curriculum that allows for deeper exploration, much like the thoughtful cultivation envisioned in Huxley’s “Island”. At Key Stage 3, we must champion a curriculum that resists the pull of early specialization, preserving its breadth and fostering engagement. The ongoing review of EBacc constraints offers an opportunity for leaders to advocate for reforms that prioritise children’s choice and curriculum balance, recognising that a truly rich education is a symphony, not a monotone. This period requires proactive collaboration with teachers, nurturing their potential, and empowering them as the “lifeboats” of the school.
Thirdly, the relevance of our curriculum for future needs is a profound imperative. A knowledge-rich foundation remains vital, but it must be a living, evolving entity, reflecting the digital complexities, the sustainability challenges, and the global interconnectedness of our world. Leaders must relentlessly combat complacency, challenging the status quo by integrating 21st-century skills and global competencies across all subjects. This is about enriching the soil of our educational landscape so that diverse identities can flourish and childrens’ horizons are broadened beyond measure.
In essence, the Educational Landscape Review is a perpetual overture to ongoing work, a deepening commitment to educational justice. For education leaders in the coming months, it is a call to embody authentic leadership: to elevate intentionality, combat complacency, champion growth, and inspire deeper connection. By embracing these movements, we can ensure that the “Alchemy of Belief” continues to transform lives, one intentional act at a time, building a resilient, compassionate, and truly authentic education system.
Pathway 1: Be Clear About What We’re Doing – Our School’s Heartbeat
Pathway 2: Don’t Just Stick to the Old Ways – Look for What’s Missing
Pathway 3: Help Everyone Grow – Empowering Our Key People
Pathway 4: Build Stronger Connections – Creating a Supportive Community
Finally, embrace the “Perpetual Overture”: Recognise that leadership is not about a final destination, but a “perpetual overture” to ongoing work. This mindset encourages continuous improvement and a deepening commitment, allowing for adaptability in the face of evolving challenges.
And with that, there will be a round up for subscribers in the next couple of days and I will be back around results week. In many respects I hope you are re-visiting this after a good, restful and well-earned break. For me, the rest comes when I have cleared and sorted my mind into the right boxes, ready for moving onto the next academic year.
Requiesce et otium sume.
Sometimes, the most profound acts of self-care are born from unexpected, spur-of-the-moment decisions. A sudden break from the relentless demands of school leadership, a spontaneous turn towards the coast, can be more than just a vacation; it can be a declaration of freedom, a desire for change, and a fundamental need for rest. Such was the case with an impromptu trip to Lyme Regis, a decision driven by an authentic leader’s innate understanding that true vitality, much like the “daily recommitment” to a mission, requires conscious revitalisation. This wasn’t merely about escaping work, but about embracing a different rhythm, a necessary recalibration of mind and spirit.
There are few experiences as universally cherished and profoundly restorative as a day spent by the sea. The unique confluence of sensory inputs, psychological detachment, and natural beauty offers a potent antidote to the stresses of modern life. And for those seeking a particularly grounding and historically rich escape, Monmouth Beach in Lyme Regis stands as a testament to the enduring benefits of coastal immersion. As much as a walk hand-in-hand, as much as that self-indulgent moment, as much as that guilty pleasure.
Stepping onto Monmouth Beach, the immediate shift in atmosphere is palpable. The soft, rhythmic whisper of sand found on other shores is replaced by the satisfying, percussive tumble of pebbles underfoot, a natural symphony orchestrated by the ebb and flow of the tide. This distinct soundscape instantly draws one into a state of mindfulness, the consistent, predictable rhythm acting as a balm to a restless mind. The rhythmic crackle of waves retreating from this pebbled shore. The air, crisp and saline, invigorates the senses, carrying the subtle scent of the ocean that promises rejuvenation. This refreshing breeze is often laden with beneficial negative ions, which are believed to enhance mood and energy levels, contributing to a profound sense of well-being. Visually, the vast expanse of Lyme Bay stretches out, meeting the horizon in a calming blue, embodying the “blue space” effect that soothes the mind and encourages a sense of peace. The dramatic, ancient Ware Cliffs loom overhead, a powerful reminder of geological time, further enhancing the feeling of perspective.
Monmouth Beach, in particular, encourages a unique form of engagement that fosters deep relaxation: fossil hunting. This isn’t merely a pastime; it’s a meditative act. With eyes scanning the shingle and pebbles, seeking the tell-tale spiral of an ammonite or the subtle imprint of a belemnite, the mind is entirely absorbed in the present moment. Worries about deadlines, errands, or digital notifications simply recede, replaced by a focused, almost childlike wonder. The discovery of a 200-million-year-old fossil, a tangible link to a primordial world, provides not just a thrill but a profound sense of perspective, shrinking contemporary anxieties against the backdrop of deep time. This deliberate engagement offers a powerful disconnect from the digital world, allowing the mind to truly reset.
Beyond the profound natural engagement, a day at the seaside also offers the simple, unadulterated pleasure of embracing local traditions. The consumption of classic seaside foods – a warm, hearty pasty, the comforting crunch of freshly fried fish and chips, followed by a sweet, cooling ice cream – becomes an integral part of the restorative experience. These culinary delights, savoured with the salty air on one’s tongue and the sound of the waves in the background, ground the moment in pure, unpretentious joy, further cementing the break from everyday pressures.
The physical act of walking on the uneven terrain of Monmouth Beach, feeling the pebbles shift and settle, offers a gentle yet effective form of exercise. This natural grounding, combined with the fresh sea air and the subtle boost of sunlight, contributes to a feeling of holistic physical and mental well-being. Mentally, the expansive views and the sheer scale of the natural environment encourage “big picture” thinking, allowing for a healthy detachment from personal concerns and a renewed sense of clarity. The absence of urban clamour and the presence of natural elements provide a unique environment for the nervous system to rebalance.
A day at Monmouth Beach is more than just a break; it’s a reset for the mind, body, and spirit. It’s an opportunity to reconnect with the elemental forces of nature, to engage the senses in a deeply satisfying way, and to find quietude in the rhythmic dance of the sea. The rugged beauty, the whisper of ancient history in every stone, and the sheer simplicity of the experience combine to offer a truly profound and lasting sense of peace, leaving one refreshed, re-energised, and ready to face the world anew.
I write this to encourage the day out, experience the Great British Holiday against the GBH of the working world; I write this to also carry something of those moments with me. A reminder of the need to be more Lyme Regis in depths of November, at the heights of the exam season and on that Monday morning when nothing seems to be going to plan and all that is left is the complexities of unravelling the issues and concerns of others.
The Authentic Leader must be more Lyme Regis.
The Key Stage 4 (KS4) curriculum in England is a complex and vital composition, orchestrating the learning journey of young people through two formative years. To truly capture its essence and the elements that elevate it to excellence, we can envision it as a four-movement symphony, each movement building upon the last to create a harmonious and impactful educational experience.
Movement I: Elevate Intentionality
The symphony begins by establishing a clear and purposeful direction, elevating the intentionality behind every aspect of the KS4 curriculum. This movement sets the foundational themes of a broad, balanced, and ambitious educational offering. It acknowledges the statutory requirements—the core pillars of English, Mathematics, and Science—which provide the essential academic bedrock. However, intentionality extends beyond mere compliance. It quickly expands to introduce the rich orchestration of subjects beyond these: the deep narratives of Humanities, the expressive colours of the Arts, the practical rhythms of Design and Technology, the logical structures of Computing, and the global melodies of Modern Foreign Languages. This opening movement declares that an excellent curriculum is not merely a list of subjects, but a comprehensive landscape meticulously designed to allow every student to discover their intellectual range and potential. This broad and balanced offering serves as the fertile ground, enabling a curriculum that is divergent and developed as the antidote and natural extension of a broad and balanced curriculum, ensuring every young learner has the opportunity to engage with and excel across a wide spectrum of knowledge with a clear purpose.
Movement II: Combat Complacency
Following the initial statement of intent, the symphony transitions into a movement dedicated to actively combating complacency in learning. This is where the true joy of learning finds its voice, forming the very heartbeat of an excellent KS4 curriculum, pushing beyond the mundane. It’s in this movement that we hear the quiet but profound resonance of a child experiencing the “aha!” moment—that sudden, illuminating spark of understanding when a complex concept resolves into clarity, shaking off any passive acceptance of information. Here, the curriculum actively fosters a sense of awe and wonder, whether through the intricate beauty of mathematical proofs, the breathtaking discoveries of scientific inquiry, or the emotional depth uncovered in a piece of literature. This movement celebrates the intrinsic motivation that blossoms from curiosity and intellectual satisfaction, a motivation far more powerful and sustainable than rote memorisation driven by exam pressure. Schools that master this movement create not just exam passers, but lifelong learners whose intellectual curiosity actively seeks out knowledge and continues to hum long after the final bell.
Movement III: Champion Growth and Evolution
The third movement, a dynamic and often intricate Scherzo, captures the active process of championing individual growth and the evolution of a student’s educational path. For students, the options process is akin to navigating a complex marketplace—their first significant foray into shaping their own educational destiny. This marketplace, with its array of academic, vocational, and technical qualifications, presents immense potential for students to choose pathways where they can genuinely thrive and evolve. It’s a moment of burgeoning independence, allowing them to sculpt their educational identity. Yet, like any complex market, it demands careful navigation. Without wise guidance, this newfound freedom can become overwhelming, leading to choices that may not align with long-term potential or genuine passion. The success of these crucial subject choices, and indeed the overall effectiveness of the KS4 curriculum, lies in a delicate interplay of influences. It sits somewhere between the ambitions of the child, fuelled by a newfound interest or a clear career goal; the influence of the parent, offering perspective and encouragement based on their understanding of their child’s strengths; and crucially, the success of the subject at Key Stage 3, providing the foundational experience and confidence for future growth. When these three elements align, the conditions for a student to truly thrive and evolve are optimally championed.
When the Centre Cannot Hold:
However, when the intentionality falters, complacency takes root, and the championing of growth is neglected, the KS4 curriculum can unravel. The “complex marketplace” of options transforms into a bewildering maze, where students, lacking wise guidance, make choices driven by fleeting trends, peer pressure, or a desperate attempt to avoid perceived weaknesses. The delicate interplay of ambition, parental influence, and Key Stage 3 success breaks down. A child’s true ambitions may be stifled by a narrow curriculum offer or a lack of understanding about future pathways. Parental influence, if uninformed or overly prescriptive, can steer a child towards unsuitable subjects, leading to disengagement and underachievement. Most critically, a weak foundation in Key Stage 3 subjects can leave students ill-equipped for the demands of GCSEs, leading to a sense of failure and a loss of confidence. In such scenarios, the “aha!” moments become rare, replaced by frustration and a growing disinterest in learning. The joy of discovery is extinguished, and the curriculum, instead of fostering growth, becomes a source of anxiety and disillusionment. When these elements fall apart, the centre of a truly excellent education cannot hold, and students are left adrift, ill-prepared for their future and disconnected from the profound potential of learning.
Movement IV: Inspire Deeper Connection
The symphony culminates in a powerful and unifying Finale, bringing together all the preceding themes into a cohesive whole that inspires deeper connection—to knowledge, to self, and to the wider world. This movement focuses on the holistic outcomes of an excellent KS4 curriculum, demonstrating how it prepares students for their future by fostering meaningful engagement. It’s about more than just qualifications; it’s about developing essential skills—communication, critical thinking, problem-solving, and teamwork—that are indispensable in an ever-evolving world and deepen a student’s connection to their capabilities. The Finale underscores the curriculum’s role in providing students with the knowledge and skills they need to progress confidently to further education, training, or employment, supported by high-quality careers guidance that helps them connect their learning to real-world opportunities. Ultimately, this concluding movement reveals that an excellent KS4 curriculum is a dynamic and responsive entity. It is ambitious in its academic rigour, broad in its offerings, deeply attentive to the individual needs and aspirations of each student, and committed to fostering intellectual curiosity, building resilience, and equipping young people with the confidence to navigate an ever-changing world. The true harmony of this symphony lies in its ability to ensure that the journey of learning remains a source of profound joy, discovery, and preparation for a fulfilling future, inspiring a deeper and lasting connection to all they have learned.
The Fading Echo and the Four Movements: Reclaiming the Daily Dawn of Enthusiasm
Reflecting on my recurring motifs, the daily renewal of connection and the conscious choice to embrace love anew – brings a poignant contrast to the experience of losing enthusiasm. Our narrative explores the deliberate act of reigniting passion, the intentionality required to nurture affection despite the predictable rhythm of life. But what happens when that initial spark, that inherent zest for the day and its possibilities, begins to fade? What does it feel like when the daily dawn, once anticipated with warmth, becomes a muted, grey affair? Everything I am writing here has an unseen backdrop – the psychodrama of being a husband and father; being middle aged and for some reason feeling rather surprised that not only does this trip off my tongue with alarming ease, but also micro stabs me when I see it on the page. I suppose, what if reclaiming the daily dawn of enthusiasm is an uphill struggle?
The loss of enthusiasm isn’t a sudden cataclysm; it’s a gradual erosion, a slow dimming of the internal flame. It begins with a subtle shift in perspective. The vibrant colours of the world seem to lose their saturation, the once-intriguing now feels commonplace. The anticipation that fuels action, the very energy that propels us to engage and create, starts to dissipate. It’s akin to the daily reset occurring not with a surge of fresh affection, but with a weary familiarity, a sense of déjà vu that breeds apathy rather than connection.
In this fading landscape, the Four Movements – Elevate Intentionality, Combat Complacency, Champion Growth and Evolution, and Inspire Deeper Connection – serve as both a supportive measure and a potent reminder of the active choices we can make to reclaim our inner spark.
Where intentionality once drove us towards engagement, its absence leaves a void filled by inertia. Elevate Intentionality reminds us that even the smallest act can be imbued with purpose. It prompts the question: What small, deliberate step can I take today that aligns with my values and brings a flicker of meaning? This movement provides a framework for consciously choosing our focus, even when motivation is low, guiding us away from passive drifting.
The “Combat Complacency” we discussed in the context of curriculum development mirrors the internal battle against a growing indifference. The once-challenging now feels insurmountable, and the comfort of the familiar, even if unfulfilling, becomes a siren song. Combat Complacency urges us to resist this pull. It whispers: Where have I become stagnant? What small challenge can I embrace today to disrupt this inertia and reignite my curiosity? This movement encourages us to actively seek novelty and push beyond the boundaries of our comfort zone, even in small ways.
The vibrant “Growth and Evolution” we championed transforms into a stagnant plateau. The curiosity that once propelled us to explore new ideas and experiences withers. The sense of personal progress, the feeling of moving forward, diminishes, replaced by a monotonous repetition of routine. Champion Growth and Evolution acts as a gentle nudge: What small act of learning or exploration can I commit to today, even if it feels insignificant? How can I cultivate a sense of forward momentum, however small? This movement reminds us that growth is a continuous process, and even small steps can break the cycle of stagnation.
Perhaps the most profound impact of lost enthusiasm is on our capacity for connection, the very heart of “I Fall in Love with You Every Day.” The initial joy in shared experiences, the spark of understanding and empathy, becomes harder to ignite. Conversations feel less engaging, interactions more perfunctory. The deeper connections we once cherished seem to require an effort we no longer possess, leading to a sense of isolation even within familiar relationships. Inspire Deeper Connection offers a guiding light: What small gesture of genuine connection can I offer today? How can I be truly present in my interactions, even when my inner spark feels dim? This movement emphasizes the reciprocal nature of connection and the potential for even small acts of kindness and engagement to rekindle our own enthusiasm.
A Potential Mantra or Prayer:
“With intention, I choose a spark. Against complacency, I seek a small challenge. For growth, I embrace a tiny step forward. Through connection, I offer a moment of presence.”
Losing enthusiasm is a quiet thief, stealing not grand possessions, but the subtle joys that colour our days. It’s the muted laughter, the half-hearted effort, the dimming of the inner light that once illuminated our path. It’s the antithesis of the daily reawakening of love we explore – instead of a conscious choice to connect, it’s a gradual drifting away, a fading echo of the vibrant self we once were. By consciously invoking the Four Movements, we can find a pathway back to that vibrant dawn, actively choosing to reignite our inner fire, much like the characters in our recurring narrative choose love, day after day.
Fleshing out the “How-To” of Divergence and Development in Practice: While I believe I’ve effectively introduced the concept of a divergent and developed curriculum, I recognise that the practical steps for achieving this could be elaborated. I could dedicate future posts to:
Deepening the “Inspire Deeper Connection” Movement for Curriculum: This movement touches on essential skills and careers guidance. I could explore this further by:
Integrating the Personal “Fading Echo” with Professional Application: My “Fading Echo” section is a powerful, vulnerable reflection on losing enthusiasm. I could connect this more directly to the process of leading curriculum change:
Suggestions I might offer to other authentic leaders wanting to create a Divergent and Developed Curriculum:
Elevate Intentionality in Curriculum Design:
Actively Combat Complacency in Learning:
Champion Growth and Evolution Through Thoughtful Pathways:
Inspire Deeper Connection (Holistic Outcomes and Future Preparedness):
In essence, my advice to other leaders would be to move beyond a checklist approach to curriculum design and instead adopt a holistic, intentional, and student-centred philosophy that prioritizes deep engagement, personal growth, and authentic connections, thereby naturally cultivating a truly divergent and developed educational experience.
[edited to add – written on 16th July 2025]
At first glance, the rigorous, often contentious world of OFSTED—with its meticulous frameworks and demanding criteria—seems far removed from the ancient, almost mystical elegance of the Golden Ratio. Represented by the Greek letter phi (ϕ), this irrational number, approximately 1.618, defines a unique proportional relationship: the ratio of the whole to the larger part is the same as the ratio of the larger part to the smaller. This mathematical harmony, closely linked to the Fibonacci sequence, manifests in nature—from sunflower spirals to nautilus shells—and has long inspired artists and architects, including Leonardo da Vinci, in their pursuit of aesthetic perfection. Imagine a line divided into two parts, ‘a’ and ‘b’, such that (a+b)/a=a/b. When this condition is met, the parts are said to be in the Golden Ratio.
Yet, in a subtly profound, if entirely metaphorical, sense, the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (OFSTED) is engaged in a perpetual quest for an “educational golden ratio.” This isn’t about literally measuring classroom dimensions for aesthetic delight; it’s about discerning, and indeed striving to mandate, the precise, harmonious balance that defines truly outstanding education and care.
OFSTED’s Architectural Blueprint
Consider the core tenets of OFSTED’s enduring mission, viewed through this peculiar lens. Its standards and quality assurance frameworks are not mere bureaucratic instruments; they are blueprints for educational excellence. Like a master builder seeking perfect proportions, OFSTED aims to define the ideal balance between safeguarding, pedagogy, leadership, and pupil outcomes. They are, in essence, crafting the architectural blueprints for optimal learning environments, much like a master builder meticulously designs a structure with perfect aesthetic balance, ensuring every component aligns to an exacting, elevated standard.
Inspections, then, are not just audits but acts of discernment. Inspectors are seeking that elusive, harmonious balance—the point where safeguarding, effective learning methodologies, and genuine pupil progress coalesce into a beautiful, eminently functional educational panorama. It is the discernment of whether the individual “parts” of an institution indeed sum to a truly “golden” whole for the children it serves. And accountability and improvement? This is the iterative, often demanding, process of continuous design refinement. Should any element prove “off-kilter,” OFSTED identifies these imbalances, providing the insights deemed necessary to adjust, course-correct, and thereby guide institutions closer to that optimal, almost perfect, state of educational excellence. Thus, while ϕ will never grace an official OFSTED report, their mission is, in a witty, metaphorical sense, to assist every educational setting in discovering and achieving its own “golden standard” of quality. It is less about mathematical beauty and more about the beautiful, profound outcome of a well-run, effective, and safe learning environment.
The Underpainting of Reform
As the educational landscape prepares for OFSTED’s revised inspection framework, the regulator has begun laying down a careful underpainting—a foundational wash to support a more considered rollout. This phased approach for the autumn term of 2025, with deliberately fewer inspections in November and December led exclusively by their most experienced personnel, aims to apply a gentle initial wash to the canvas, ensuring a steady foundation. External inspectors, like new colours introduced to a complex palette, will be phased in only after rigorous training and quality checks. This emphasis on training and quality assurance, extending even to senior inspectors participating in pilot inspections under direct OFSTED leadership, underscores a commitment to precision in every stroke.
Transparency and feedback mechanisms—random exit interviews, continued post-inspection surveys, and roundtable discussions—will offer a reflective counterbalance, akin to the interplay of light and shadow in a painting, seeking a broader, more comprehensive vista of the sector. Additional measures include avoiding inspections in the final week of term, a more robust system for deferral requests, co-developed guidance materials, and a dedicated helpline. Coupled with unprecedented public access to inspector training via the OFSTED Academy, all these initiatives strive to prevent discord in the brushstrokes, aiming to reduce friction and foster trust.
The Blurred Lines of Critique
However, despite these thoughtful and ostensibly judicious procedural adjustments, an independent critique from the sector introduces a persistent blurring of lines in the distant hues. A primary concern revolves around the sheer pace of the roll-out, which many perceive as unduly rushed, risking implementation before the canvas is truly prepared. There are urgent pleas for a more measured and genuinely collaborative approach, allowing schools and colleges the vital time to adapt, to truly internalize the new perspective—a call for strategic patience rather than a frantic application of paint.
Beyond mere speed, the very design of the framework itself continues to create a fundamental disharmony in the scene. The proposed five-point grading system, for instance, is widely viewed as fundamentally flawed, a design in need of deeper, more structural reform, not merely minor adjustments. Critics contend that procedural tweaks, while perhaps alleviating immediate friction, ultimately fail to address these underlying issues with the framework’s core principles. This isn’t merely a detached policy discussion; it’s the lived reality of institutions striving for transformation against a perceived misalignment in foundational “proportions.”
Toward a More Harmonious Future
Ultimately, the quest for true reassurance and trust transcends these operational refinements. Many believe genuine confidence will only emerge from a fundamental rethinking of the inspection model itself. There is a profound desire for more meaningful engagement with the sector, aiming to co-create a system that genuinely supports improvement and nurtures growth, rather than simply enforcing compliance. This echoes the need for a system rooted in principled, passionate, and genuinely present leadership.
As the autumn term approaches, all eyes will be fixed on how OFSTED’s announced measures translate into practice, and whether they can indeed bridge the gap between procedural improvements and the sectors deeply held desire for a more supportive and effective inspection system. The pursuit of this “educational golden ratio” is therefore less a definitive conclusion and more a perpetual underpainting—the ongoing work, the deepening commitment, and the relentless pursuit of an inspection system that truly serves its profound purpose of educational justice, thereby helping compose a more just, connected, and flourishing society.
School leaders should aim to achieve an “educational golden ratio” by focusing on a harmonious balance between safeguarding, pedagogy, leadership, and children’s outcomes.
This involves discerning how the individual parts of their institution contribute to a truly “golden” whole for the children it serves.
In practice, this means:
The full story is available for you to read here: IFILWYED.pdf I tried, I succeeded, I failed. I tried again, but with a greater sense of purpose and with a more introspective review of how I failed. I had to grow and I needed to stop hiding from myself as well as others. A cathartic experience, the key purpose of writing again became about the following:
Emotional Release and Inner Cleansing: I wrote this “I Fall in Love with you Every Day”, as a way to process the emotional distress and psychological harm I experienced. It became a space where I could finally voice the unspeakable feelings I had, allowing me to confront the turbulent and complex terrain of my inner life. I recounted the sleepless nights, the gnawing pressure, and the relentless emotional siege I endured during my leadership journey, especially the deeply personal wound from missing out on the Headship. The very act of composing this ‘symphony’ was my way of grappling with my human experience in the often-brutal reality of school improvement, helping me to cleanse myself of those pent-up emotions.
Gaining Clarity and Perspective (Cognitive Dimension): Through these writings, I embarked on a deep reflection, weaving in philosophical musings, practical insights, and candid self-assessment. My aim was to achieve holistic understanding and healing, and to reconstruct my beliefs from multiple perspectives. Writing the ‘Adagio’ movement, my personal and professional reckoning after the missed Headship, forced me into a period of intense self-doubt and painful reassessment. By articulating these experiences, I gained immense clarity on both my perceived failings and the genuine strengths that emerged from their shadows, ultimately understanding my journey more profoundly.
Healing and Processing: This work was fundamentally about seeking holistic understanding and healing, and about reconstructing my beliefs after what felt like a traumatic experience. Structuring it as a symphony provided a profound, and often subconscious, pathway for processing my emotional distress. The ‘Adagio’ movement, in particular, became a space for lament and reflection, allowing me to unfold my grief and quietly acknowledge my pain. Ultimately, the ‘Finale’ strives for resolution and catharsis, guiding me towards integration and a renewed sense of hope, which are crucial steps in my healing process.
Self-Discovery and Authenticity: This work represents a deeply personal and professional reflection, a necessary self-excavation. Through its pages, I’ve revealed my psychology, driven by a powerful blend of idealism and pragmatism, and my unwavering belief in the boundless potential of every child. I’ve openly acknowledged the resilience forged in adversity and the ‘scars and the steel’ that now inform my leadership. This writing allowed me to expose the lived realities of exhaustion, disappointment, and vulnerability, making my internal monologue visible and leading to a more authentic understanding of myself.
A Sense of Relief and Lightness: While I don’t explicitly state feeling ‘light,’ the overarching purpose of personal catharsis in this document inherently implies a profound sense of relief. By structuring my experiences as a symphony, aiming for resolution in the ‘Finale,’ I’ve sought to move towards a state of equilibrium and release from the burden of my past struggles. The continuous process of reconstructing my beliefs and striving to move forward signifies a shedding of emotional weight and a renewed sense of purpose.
I now offer what I feel was the most purposed aspect of writing “I Fall in Love with you Every Day” outside of the start, and that is the finish.
Like any grand composition, my professional and personal journey has unfolded in movements, each shaping its melody. It began, as all symphonies must, with an Overture – that daily, intentional commitment to “falling in love.” This wasn’t merely a romantic notion, but an active, philosophical stance against complacency, constantly re-engaging with the vital connections of pedagogy, people, and passion. It set the tone, introducing the overarching theme: that education, at its heart, is a continuous discovery, transforming routine into a symphony of purpose.
The First Movement, an Allegro of turbulent intensity, was marked by a decade-long odyssey at The International School, reborn as Tile Cross Academy. This was a raw, visceral period of wrestling with profound challenges, where Covey’s “seven chronic problems” felt like a direct diagnosis of the school’s very soul. It was a relentless fight for social mobility, fuelled by my own complex background and a fierce belief in justice, often against formidable odds. Despite moments of despair, there was also an exhilarating, restless search for equilibrium, finding fragile flickers of hope in small, hard-won victories. This was the movement of unyielding dedication, a crucible forging the very essence of my convictions.
Then came the Second Movement, an Adagio of profound lament. The Headship disappointment at Tile Cross was a deeply personal wound, profoundly questioning my value and principles after a decade poured into that space. It offered a necessary, albeit painful, space for reflection, acknowledging the emotional toll and processing the raw truth of an unmet aspiration. This was where the lyrical lines of self-assessment found their voice, prompting a crucial shift in perspective.
The Third Movement, a Minuet/Scherzo, emerged as a period of rhythmic shifts and evolving strategies during my transition to Saltley Academy. The landscape was different, seemingly “Good,” yet subtle echoes of past challenges resonated. My coping mechanisms shifted from crisis-driven salvaging to strategic patience and a deeper understanding of influence. Emotional intelligence became my indispensable tool, allowing me to navigate complexities with self-awareness, empathy, and a nuanced approach. This movement involved fragmented attempts to find new forms of release and impact, subtly recalibrating my leadership from direct mandate to relational influence.
Now, the Concluding Allegro is underway, striving for integration and renewed hope. The profound lessons learned resonate: dedication alone, however fierce, is insufficient without the adaptive power of emotional intelligence, trust-building, and true collaboration. The resilience forged in adversity has become a powerful testament, its scars etched into the very score of who I am. My unwavering motivation remains rooted in equitable opportunity for children, families, and communities. The hard-earned wisdom now fuels a pervasive culture of high expectations and distributed leadership, where every small breakthrough, act of teacher creativity, collective purpose, and refusal to accept limitations reaffirms that “falling in love” continues, day after day. The journey is far from over; it is a symphony in perpetual composition, its commitment renewed, its love deepening, and its belief in a more just future strengthening with every note.
The Fourth Movement: The Finale – Integration and Legacy
The curtain is not merely rising; it is receding. The preceding movements—the overture’s philosophical declaration, the turbulent allegro of Tile Cross, the reflective adagio of my Headship disappointment, and the nuanced scherzo of early Saltley adaptation—have set the stage. Now, the Fourth Movement begins. This is the Finale, a grand Allegro or Vivace, where all themes converge, where dissonances find resolution, and where the intricate harmonies of my personal growth and the collective flourishing of Saltley Academy intertwine into a resonant, unifying whole. This is the integration, the purposeful culmination of a journey that seeks to leave not just an echo, but a lasting legacy.
The Conductor’s Baton: Integrating Self and System
My capacity to lead Saltley Academy, to truly orchestrate its progress, is inextricably linked to the conductor within. The “symphony of the soul,” described in the overture, no longer plays a separate, internal score; it now harmonizes directly with the dynamic reality of school leadership. The obligato of my own growth – the lessons learned, the scars earned, the wisdom hard-won – is not a distraction, but the very essence that enriches the collective composition of Team Saltley.
I recall a moment early in my Saltley tenure when an emerging middle leader, bright-eyed and brimming with ideas, approached me with a proposal for a new pastoral initiative. In my Tile Cross days, particularly during its more chaotic phases, my instinct would have been to dive in, perhaps even take the reins, driven by that almost visceral need to ‘fix’ and to control. But the adagio of disappointment, the period of profound self-reflection after the Headship interview, had taught me the quiet power of the pause. Instead, I listened, truly listened, allowing his vision to unfold, asking questions that invited him to deepen his own thinking rather than simply seeking my validation. My emotional intelligence, honed through the fires of near-burnout and the sting of personal setbacks, allowed me to self-manage the instinctual urge to dominate. I could feel the familiar pull, the old patterns of wanting to be “Captain Ahab,” but I consciously wielded the conductor’s baton differently. I allowed the space, the silence between the notes, for his own melody to emerge.
This is the constant practice of integrating my inner self with my outward leadership. It’s about recognizing when my experiences or anxieties might color my perception and consciously adjusting the lens. The resilience forged in adversity isn’t just about bouncing back; it’s about the capacity to remain calm amidst the storm, to trust others, and to lead with a grounded presence. It means acknowledging the shadow of the “second fiddle” – that lingering feeling of being the supporting act – but transforming it into the strength of the “second violin section,” providing essential harmonic foundation and rhythmic drive, ensuring the entire ensemble flourishes.
Reflection for Leaders:
The Meticulous Score: Elevating Intentionality in Action
In this Finale, ‘Elevating Intentionality’ is not merely a philosophical pronouncement; it is the meticulous score that guides every instrumentalist. It is about moving beyond reactive leadership, where we simply respond to the cacophony of daily demands, to a proactive composition where every note, every phrase, serves a deliberate purpose.
At Saltley, this has manifested in a thousand small, deliberate choices. I recall the shift in our weekly senior leadership team meetings. Previously, the agenda, though structured, often felt like a laundry list of immediate problems. Now, prompted by a conscious effort to Elevate Intentionality, each agenda item is framed with its “why,” its desired outcome, and its link to our overarching “Belonging, Connection, Purpose” vision. For instance, a discussion about persistent absence is no longer just about tracking numbers; it’s about intentionally exploring how we can deepen student connection to the school to foster their sense of purpose, thus impacting attendance. We might explicitly ask, “What specific interventions will elevate the intentionality of student presence, beyond mere punitive measures?” This simple reframing has transformed our dialogue from problem-solving to proactive vision-building.
One anecdote that vividly illustrates this was a conversation with a teacher struggling with a particularly challenging class. Her frustration was palpable. Instead of offering a quick fix, I intentionally steered the conversation to her “why” – why she became a teacher, what she genuinely believed about every child’s potential. We discussed how to intentionally re-engage those disaffected students, not just manage their behaviour. This led to her designing a project-based learning unit that allowed for greater student autonomy, a direct outcome of our intentional shift in focus. The ‘Who Am I?’ guide, in this context, serves as my personal score, ensuring my actions are consistently aligned with the values I espouse, making my leadership predictable and trustworthy.
Exercise for Leaders: The Intentional Agenda
For your next team meeting, review the agenda. For each item, ask yourself:
Share this refined agenda with your team beforehand, framing the meeting around these intentional questions. Observe how it changes the quality of discussion and decision-making.
The Persistent Dissonance: Combatting Complacency as a Continuous Practice
Even in a school deemed ‘Good,’ the insidious creep of complacency is the persistent dissonance that threatens to mute the symphony. It’s the comfortable inertia, the quiet acceptance of ‘good enough,’ or the subtle belief that past successes guarantee future triumphs. Combatting this isn’t a one-off battle; it’s a continuous, vigilant practice, a willingness to embrace healthy disruption.
I’ve learned that complacency often masquerades as efficiency. “That’s how we always do it” can be a siren song, lulling us into routines that, while functional, may no longer be optimal. An example of this emerged when reviewing our pastoral referral system. It was “working,” but upon closer inspection, it wasn’t truly capturing the nuances of student need; it was more of a data collection exercise than a proactive intervention tool. Challenging this status quo felt uncomfortable, especially for staff accustomed to the routine. There was a palpable “dissonance” – a resistance to change that was rooted in comfort, not malice.
My approach, echoing Kurt Lewin’s ‘unfreezing’ concept, was not to dismantle it immediately, but to highlight the opportunity cost of complacency. I presented anonymized student narratives, illustrating how the current system was failing to connect the dots for our most vulnerable learners. This created a new kind of discomfort – the dissonance of seeing a known problem persist when a better way was possible. We engaged in a series of “critical friends” sessions, inviting external leaders to review our processes, which provided an objective mirror. It wasn’t about finding fault, but about intentionally seeking the friction that sparks innovation. We asked, “Where is our comfort holding us back from truly serving every child?”
Reflection for Leaders: Diagnosing Complacency
The Crescendo of Collective Potential: Championing Growth and Evolution for All
The Third Movement builds into a dynamic crescendo: ‘Championing Growth and Evolution’ for every individual and for the collective Team Saltley. It’s about moving beyond simply supporting development to actively cultivating an environment where potential is recognized, nurtured, and unleashed, leading to a flourishing ensemble.
This has been particularly vital in empowering our middle leaders, the “lifeboats” of the school, as I’ve previously described them. I recall a specific conversation with a Head of Department who, for years, had been incredibly effective within her silo. She was a master of her subject, but hesitant to step into broader school leadership. My challenge to her, framed within our ‘four movements’ philosophy, was to Champion Growth and Evolution not just for her department, but for her person within the wider school. I explicitly invited her to lead a cross-departmental initiative focusing on interdisciplinary projects, an area she felt less confident in but was passionate about. This was a deliberate act of distributed leadership, aligning with Alma Harris’s emphasis on dispersing leadership responsibilities.
The growth wasn’t linear. There were moments of doubt, setbacks where the project felt overwhelming. But my role, as the leader championing her growth, was to provide the ‘scaffolding and unwavering support,’ as described in my early Saltley reflections. I didn’t solve her problems; I provided the “philosopher in the cupboard” space for her to bounce ideas, receive affirmation, and, crucially, find her own route back to success. Witnessing her present the successful outcomes of that project to the entire staff was a profound moment – a true crescendo of collective potential where her individual growth ignited a broader sense of possibility within the team.
This also means fostering an environment where failures are seen not as endpoints, but as opportunities for learning. We’ve introduced ‘Learning Loops’ in our professional development, where teams reflect on initiatives, identify what worked and what didn’t, and, most importantly, articulate the ‘next iteration.’ This cultivates a mindset that is constantly evolving, embracing the “messiness” of change that Michael Fullan describes. It means the “second fiddle” can become a soloist in their own right, and the entire orchestra benefits from the expanded talent.
Exercise for Leaders: The Growth Trajectory
The Resonant Harmony: Inspiring Deeper Connection
At the very heart of the symphony, of any thriving human system, is ‘Inspiring Deeper Connection.’ This is the resonant harmony that binds individuals into a cohesive whole, transforming a collection of parts into a powerful, unified force. In education, this means fostering genuine relationships – between students, between staff, and between the school and its wider community.
The ‘Trojan Horse affair’ had left its indelible mark at Saltley, not just suspicion of leadership, but perhaps a subtle fragmentation within the staff. My initial commitment to ‘listening intently and without judgment’ was the first note in rebuilding this connection. I remember a particularly moving conversation with a long-serving teacher, her voice etched with the weariness of past battles. She shared stories of the school’s resilience, but also the lingering sense of being misunderstood by outsiders. Instead of offering solutions, I simply validated her experience, acknowledging the pain and the unwavering dedication that had kept her there. That raw act of empathetic listening, of truly “seeing” her, forged a deeper connection than any policy document ever could. It was an instance of the ‘Trust Equation’ playing out, building intimacy through vulnerability.
This translates into daily practices. Our ‘All adults at Saltley Academy are pastoral leaders’ initiative was, at its core, a call to ‘Inspire Deeper Connection.’ It wasn’t just about enforcing rules, but about every adult recognizing their role in fostering a sense of belonging for every child. Actions like ‘meet and greet from the door’ are simple, yet powerful rituals of connection, ensuring every student feels seen and acknowledged from the moment they arrive. Similarly, the ‘Unseen Contract of Our Houses’ seeks to build community through Scanlonian principles, where belonging is fostered through justifiability to others, and connection thrives through mutual recognition and respect.
The ‘RSA Pinball Kids’ report became a shared lens through which to discuss empathy and the systemic need for strong relationships with trusted adults. It reinforced that preventing exclusion isn’t about isolated interventions, but about a pervasive culture of connection, ensuring no child feels like a “pinball” bounced around a system that doesn’t care.
Reflection for Leaders: Cultivating Connection
The Enduring Motif: Scars and the Steel
The ‘Scars and the Steel’ are not static backdrops; they are the enduring motif, the persistent bass line that underpins the entire symphony. The emotional damage of witnessing systemic failure at Tile Cross, the brutal sting of the missed Headship – these are not just memories but lived experiences that continue to shape the very fibre of my leadership at Saltley.
The psychological toll of that Headship failure, the ‘seismic tremor’ that questioned my very worth, forced a brutal inventory. Yet, it was in that introspection, that ‘Adagio’ of personal reassessment, that the ‘steel’ was truly forged. I learned that dedication alone, while a powerful engine, is not enough. It requires a shrewd awareness of organizational politics, an understanding of the intricate dance between individual effort and systemic forces, and a profound resilience to absorb blows and continue the fight. This personal crucible has gifted me a unique lens: a deeper empathy for those who feel unseen, undervalued, or overlooked. When a colleague expresses frustration about a perceived injustice, I hear the echoes of my own past; my response is tempered by that hard-won understanding, allowing me to lead with both compassion and strategic resolve.
I confess, the ‘fading echo’ of enthusiasm can still make an appearance, particularly when confronted with familiar patterns of inertia or resistance. Yet, the ‘Four Movements’—Elevate Intentionality, Combat Complacency, Champion Growth and Evolution, and Inspire Deeper Connection—serve as my personal compass for re-engagement. When I feel that subtle drift towards apathy, I consciously invoke the mantra: “With intention, I choose a spark. Against complacency, I seek a small challenge. For growth, I embrace a tiny step forward. Through connection, I offer a moment of presence.” This is my ‘mantra or prayer,’ a daily act of recalibration to reignite the inner fire.
The struggle with the ‘second fiddle’ identity persists, a quiet counterpoint in the symphony. Am I destined to always be the unsung harmony? The analysis of the Deputy Head as the “orchestra’s second violin” resonates profoundly. It speaks to the vital, indispensable contribution that is often felt more than seen, the harmonic foundation that allows the main melody to soar. My aim is not to escape this role, but to master it, to wield that second violin with such precision and power that its contribution is undeniable, a quiet revolution of profound impact. This involves accepting the unique demands of this position, leveraging my influence to strengthen the collective, rather than seeking the spotlight.
Reflection for Leaders: Embracing the Scars
The Final Cadenza: Legacy and Future
The Final Cadenza of this Fourth Movement looks beyond the immediate, towards the legacy of this symphony and its enduring future. It is not about a definitive end, but about the profound resonance that continues long after the final note, the impact that transcends my direct involvement.
My ultimate aim is to cultivate a self-sustaining ‘Team Saltley,’ where the ‘Four Movements’ are not merely my guiding principles but deeply ingrained in the collective ethos. I envision a school where ‘Elevated Intentionality’ is practiced by every leader, from the classroom to the boardroom, ensuring every decision is purposeful and aligned. I see a culture where ‘Combatting Complacency’ is a shared responsibility, where healthy challenge and continuous improvement are celebrated, not feared. I aspire to a system where ‘Championing Growth and Evolution’ is a systemic imperative, where every student and staff member is empowered to reach their full potential, and where leadership capacity is organically developed at every level, ensuring a robust pipeline for the future. And most importantly, I dream of a community where ‘Deeper Connection’ is the very fabric of daily life, fostering profound trust, empathy, and a shared sense of belonging for all.
This requires preparing leaders for what I term the “third movement” – a future demanding agility, distributed responsibility, and a deep sense of collective purpose. The forthcoming leadership away day is a crucial crucible for this: a space to liberate us from “Team Previous” habits and allow new leaders to shine. My role now is less about conducting every instrument and more about ensuring the orchestra understands the score, trusts each other, and possesses the collective will to play on, even when the conductor’s baton is passed.
My legacy, then, won’t be defined by titles or individual achievements, but by the collective’s strength and resilience. It’s about empowering others to compose their own compelling movements, to lead with courage, empathy, and integrity. It’s about ensuring that the ‘Alchemy of Belief’—the forging of a post-traumatic pedagogy from a crucible of thinkers and lived experience—continues to transform lives long after my direct involvement.
The ‘Siren Song of Self,’ the pervasive consumerism that threatens to eclipse citizenship, remains a significant challenge. My commitment, as outlined in my meta-commentary on Birmingham, is to foster citizens, not just consumers. This means instilling critical thinking, empathy, and a profound understanding that their role extends far beyond the marketplace. This is the ultimate purpose of this symphony: to help compose a more just, connected, and flourishing society—one child, one leader, one intentional act at a time.
The ‘Echo of Pala,’ Aldous Huxley’s utopian vision of intentionality, mindfulness, and growth, resonates as my distant North Star. My belief in ‘I Fall in Love with You Every Day’ is the enduring commitment to this ideal, a daily recommitment to seeing anew, appreciating nuances, and consciously strengthening the bonds that define our existence. It is the wisdom gained through ‘The Unseen Curriculum’ of John Berger and the ‘Black Box of Learning’ of Dylan Wiliam: to see beyond the metrics, peer into the human story, and demystify the learning process.
The ‘Alchemy of Belief’ continues, drawing from the stark societal critiques of Marx and Curtis, the neurobiological insights of Zak, the humanistic wisdom of Berger and Katz, and the practical strategies of Wiliam and Taylor. This eclectic mix is my crucible, continually refining my post-traumatic pedagogy, seeking holistic understanding, healing, and resonance.
The final act of any great symphony is not just about bringing the music to a close, but about creating an indelible impression, a resonance that lingers in the listener’s soul long after the final chord fades. My aspiration is that this unfolding symphony of leadership and learning leaves such a resonance. That the principles of ‘Elevate Intentionality,’ ‘Combat Complacency,’ ‘Champion Growth and Evolution,’ and ‘Inspire Deeper Connection’ become the very fabric of Saltley Academy. That the dedication to ‘The Adult Imperative,’ the insistence on ‘The High Press,’ and the wisdom gleaned from ‘The Unseen Contract of Our Houses’ are not merely strategies but deeply embedded cultural practices.
The journey of school improvement is, as I’ve confessed, a “relentless, often brutal, reckoning.” The ‘Scars and the Steel’ forged in Tile Cross continue to inform my path. The ‘Dark Triad’ of destructive habits serves as a constant reminder of the shadow side of leadership, against which my ‘Four Movements’ are the potent antidote.
The ‘Second Movement’ of personal disappointment, the ‘melancholy’ of the missed Headship, had to be embraced, but it also had to end. It was the necessary dissonance that led to a richer harmony. The “crossroads” of whether to be explicit about my personal reflections or to keep the focus solely on “them” has, I hope, found its resolution in this unfolding narrative. My journey is not separate from theirs; it is an “unfolding symphony” where my growth harmonizes with theirs, an “obligato” enriching the whole.
The ‘Art of Smiling Through Gritted Teeth’ in communication, the careful balancing act of transparency and empathy amidst flux, will remain a constant practice. It is the recognition that leading change is an act of emotional diplomacy, guiding the ship forward while acknowledging the very human discomfort of the journey.
And so, the commitment deepens. The decision to stay at Saltley, initially a “tentative dip,” has solidified into something profound. It’s about seeing the long-term impact of subtle cultural shifts, the gradual improvement in student lives and staff well-being. It’s about embracing the opportunity to cultivate a truly collaborative leadership team, united by a shared vision.
This concludes the “overture” to my next stage of deep introspection and development. My journey continues, not as a linear ascent, but as a circular dance of learning, adapting, and growing. The fight for better outcomes for the children of Birmingham remains the unwavering north star, now pursued with a more tempered idealism, but with an even deeper resolve forged in the crucible of personal experience. The “Alchemy of Adaptation” continues, where emotional intelligence is refined and applied with greater precision and wisdom. The leadership is not about a destination, but a continuous journey, a persistent “falling in love every day.”
Reflection for Leaders: Composing Your Legacy
A Personal Cadenza: Beyond Prediction, Towards Catharsis
This concluding movement, the Finale of my leadership symphony, finds its true purpose not in predicting the future, but in a deeper, more profound act: personal catharsis. The words laid bare within these pages are not a strategic blueprint for what comes next for Philip Edmundson or Saltley Academy. Instead, they are the very act of processing, of understanding, of a leader grappling with his own human experience in the relentless, often brutal, reckoning that is school improvement. This has been a deeply introspective journey, a necessary self-excavation to understand my own perceived failings and, in doing so, to illuminate the genuine strengths that have emerged from their shadows.
The ‘Scars and the Steel’ that inform my leadership are not merely abstract concepts; they are the lived realities of exhaustion, disappointment, and the stark recognition of professional vulnerability. The initial desire to ‘fix’ everything, the impatience for immediate results that often characterized my earlier Tile Cross years, were indeed failings. They led to moments where I might have been overly direct, perhaps even dismissive of slower, more organic processes, driven by an almost visceral need to prove worth. The sting of the missed Headship, in particular, forced an unflinching mirror onto these aspects of my character. It revealed an ego bruised by unmet aspiration, and a reliance on sheer dedication that, while powerful, was insufficient on its own. Yet, in confronting these very limitations, a new kind of strength was forged. The ‘Adagio’ of personal reassessment taught me the quiet power of the pause, transforming that initial impatience into strategic patience, that need for control into a profound trust in others’ capabilities. It allowed the latent strengths of empathy—honed from my own complex background—to truly flourish, offering a deeper understanding of those who feel unseen or undervalued. My resilience, previously a raw, almost frantic survival mechanism, matured into a grounded presence, able to remain calm amidst the storm, trusting in the collective, rather than feeling solely responsible for carrying the weight. This writing, then, is the very act of forging that steel, of processing the heat and pressure of past experiences into a refined and purposeful leadership. It is my internal monologue made visible, a testament to the fact that genuine growth stems from an honest appraisal of our imperfections.
The Orchestral Score Shared: Collaboration Through Anonymity
If this narrative is a personal cadenza, then its sharing is a profound gesture of collaboration through anonymity. This is not a memoir published for personal accolade, nor a prescriptive guide to be followed blindly. Instead, it is an offering – a piece of my professional and personal score, anonymously shared, inviting others to find echoes of their own journeys, to draw parallels, and to engage in a deeper, more honest dialogue about the realities of leading and teaching in education. It is a quiet call for a more “graduate profession” view of our work.
Like any established profession – medicine, law, engineering – education is complex, nuanced, and inherently human. Yet, unlike some, it often lacks consistent, safe spaces for vulnerability, for the candid discussion of not just successes, but also the messy, challenging, and sometimes deeply disheartening failures. My intent in sharing these reflections, stripped of the immediate context of my personal identity, is to contribute to a collective wisdom. Imagine a vast orchestra where individual musicians, after a performance, don’t just critique the final sound, but openly share their practice routines, their struggles with difficult passages, their moments of doubt, and their strategies for mastering their instrument. This is the essence of what I advocate: a professional dialogue in education where insights are valued for their substance, for their capacity to illuminate common challenges and shared solutions, rather than being filtered through the lens of individual reputation or hierarchy.
This approach is about demystifying leadership. It’s about pulling back the curtain on the often-private struggles that every leader faces, regardless of their title. When we, as educators, are willing to engage in such authentic, vulnerable self-reflection and share it (even anonymously), we create a culture where learning from experience becomes a collective endeavour. It normalizes the struggles, celebrates the resilience, and builds a powerful foundation of mutual respect and understanding. This collective learning, born from shared introspection, is a far more potent force for professional growth than any top-down directive or external audit. It elevates our craft from a series of individual performances to a truly collaborative and continuously improving symphony of professional practice. It underscores that we are not lone conductors, but part of an ensemble, where each part, each personal score, enriches the collective masterpiece.
The Symphony’s Invulnerability: An Internal Fortification
What happens next for me, or for Saltley, is ultimately a continuation of this unfolding process, not a final purpose of this writing. The true purpose lies in fortifying the very profession of education. For far too long, our educational “symphony” has been buffeted by the “dissonances” of external forces: the ever-shifting sands of government dogma, the capricious winds of civil service directives, the unpredictable gusts of political whim, and the profound, often challenging, shifts in cultural baggage within our 21st-century British society. These are constant threats, capable of muting our harmonies, fragmenting our efforts, and ultimately, undermining our core purpose. The only way we can make the profession truly invulnerable to these slings and arrows requires an internal fortification, a cultivation of unwavering strength from within.
This invulnerability is composed of three interconnected elements: personal renewal, professional resilience, and an unwavering dedication to the cause.
The Concluding Movement: A Perpetual Overture
And so, the journey continues, not as a linear ascent towards a final destination, but as a circular dance of learning, adapting, and growing. This symphony is never truly finished; it is always composing itself, each challenge a new motif, each resolution a fresh harmony. My reflections, my “movements,” are not a grand pronouncement, but a perpetual overture to what is always coming next—the ongoing work, the deepening commitment, and the relentless pursuit of educational justice.
The fight for better outcomes for the children of Birmingham remains the unwavering north star, now pursued with a more tempered idealism, but with an even deeper resolve forged in the crucible of personal experience. The “Alchemy of Adaptation” continues, where emotional intelligence is refined and applied with greater precision and wisdom. This leadership is not about a destination, but a continuous journey, a persistent “falling in love every day.”
For the reader, for every leader, for every educator, this narrative is an invitation. An invitation to engage in your own profound act of reflection, to consider your own unwritten movements. What movements are yet to unfold in your leadership journey or in your team’s development? How can you proactively begin to compose them? What enduring resonance would you want your leadership symphony to leave in the lives of those you lead and serve? How are you actively preparing your team or organization to continue its symphony of purpose and growth, even if you are no longer the primary conductor? And how do you actively ensure your personal values and growth remain harmonized with your professional leadership, integrating your inner self with your outer impact?
May your own symphonies of purpose and resilience play on, inspiring profound change, one intentional act at a time.
[edited to add – written in May 2025]
The air crackles with the energy of transition. Here in Birmingham, as the familiar rhythms of Saltley shift, my focus sharpens on a fundamental question: how do we truly prepare leaders to be leaders, not just for the present, but for what I term the “third movement” – a future demanding agility, distributed responsibility, and a deeply ingrained sense of collective purpose? My recent conversations with two key colleagues have crystallized this imperative, pushing me to liberate us from the comfortable inertia of past processes and instead cultivate an environment where leadership blossoms across the organization. This isn’t about perpetuating a “Team Previous”; it’s about nurturing a robust “Team Saltley,” anchored by a strengthened Senior Leadership Team (Team SLT) that, in turn, empowers the entire Saltley collective.
As the young Marx eloquently wrote, “If we have chosen the position in life in which we can most of all work for mankind, no burdens can bow us down, because they are sacrifices for the benefit of all; then we shall experience no petty, limited, selfish joy, but our happiness will belong to millions, our deeds will live on quietly but perpetually at work, and over our ashes will be shed the hot tears of noble people.” While our immediate context is the advancement of Team Saltley, this sentiment resonates deeply. The burdens of leadership transition, of dismantling ingrained habits and fostering new growth, are not individual trials but investments in a shared future. The true joy lies not in personal accolades but in the collective flourishing of the team and, by extension, the wider community we serve.
Our upcoming leadership away day is a crucial crucible in this process. It’s an opportunity to move beyond theoretical discussions and actively create space for emerging leaders to shine. This requires a conscious effort to step back, to trust in their potential, and to design activities that empower them to take ownership and demonstrate their capabilities. We must move beyond a model where leadership emanates from a single point to one where it is distributed, where initiative is encouraged, and where individuals feel empowered to contribute their unique talents. This shift demands a liberation from the “how we’ve always done things” mentality, recognizing that clinging to the past can stifle the very innovation and dynamism we need for the third movement. This aligns strongly with the work of Alma Harris, a leading voice in educational leadership, who emphasizes that genuine school improvement hinges on the dispersal of leadership responsibilities.
The structuring of line management plays a pivotal role in nurturing this distributed leadership. It’s not merely about hierarchical reporting; it’s about creating supportive frameworks that foster growth and accountability. We must move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach and tailor these structures to individual needs and aspirations, recognizing that some will require more direct guidance while others will thrive with greater autonomy. This involves a commitment to active mentorship and coaching, where senior leaders invest time and energy in developing the capabilities of those they manage, preparing them not just for their current roles but for future leadership opportunities within Team Saltley. Harris (2009) highlights the importance of creating structures that enable and support the development of leadership capacity at all levels, moving away from a purely hierarchical model.
Simultaneously, we must navigate the inevitable transitions with empathy and foresight. For those moving on, our responsibility is to ensure a smooth and respectful departure, acknowledging their contributions and facilitating a seamless handover. For those who may lack support elsewhere within the broader organizational landscape, our reach must extend proactively. This requires a heightened awareness of individual needs and a commitment to providing the necessary guidance and resources, even if it falls outside traditional line management structures. This is the essence of “Team Saltley” – a network of mutual support and shared responsibility.
However, as Marx astutely observed, “Actual extremes cannot be mediated with each other precisely because they are actual extremes. But neither are they in need of mediation, because they are opposed in essence.” Within Team SLT, we have individuals who have earned their positions, yet the journey of leadership is one of continuous earning. The “stripes” of true leadership are not granted by title but forged through demonstrable impact, collaborative spirit, and a relentless commitment to the common good. This period demands a frank and honest appraisal of our established senior team, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and mutual accountability. We must establish a strong and cohesive Team SLT before we can effectively integrate more upper middle leaders and ensure a sustainable pipeline of leadership for the future.
The Four Guiding Movements of Team Saltley: This transition is not merely a structural shift; it is guided by four core movements that underpin the philosophy of Team Saltley and our aspirations for the future.
These four movements – Elevate Intentionality, Combat Complacency, Champion Growth and Evolution, and Inspire Deeper Connections – form the ethical and strategic compass guiding our transition to Team Saltley and our journey into the third movement of leadership development.
It’s at this point that I stand on a crossroads. These movements, these writings and self-reflected and confessed writings have only ever influenced what I am doing; do I need to be explicit? Is it time to share? I don’t want this to be about me. It needs to be about them.
And there you have it. It needs to be about them.
Ultimately, the transition from Team Previous to Team Saltley is about embodying the spirit of Marx’s second reflection: “History calls those men the greatest who have ennobled themselves by working for the common good; experience acclaims as happiest the man who has made the greatest number of people happy.” Our aim is not individual aggrandisement but the collective advancement of Team Saltley. By fostering a culture of distributed leadership, by supporting individual growth, and by prioritizing the needs of the whole, we aim to create an environment where everyone can contribute their best, leading to a shared success that far surpasses any individual achievement. This is the essence of preparing leaders for the third movement – a movement defined by collaboration, empowerment, and an unwavering commitment to the common good of Team Saltley.
Here, at this juncture in crafting the narrative of Team Saltley’s evolution, I find myself standing at a familiar crossroads. The inherent tension between the personal and the collective hums with a particular resonance. The movements I’ve articulated – Elevate Intentionality, Combat Complacency, Champion Growth and Evolution, and Inspire Deeper Connections – are not abstract ideals confined to organizational charts and strategic plans. They are deeply interwoven with my own journey as a leader, a symphony where my personal and professional growth finds its harmony within the flourishing of Team Saltley.
The temptation, as always, is to shy away from the personal, to ensure the spotlight remains firmly fixed on “them,” on the burgeoning leadership within Saltley. The refrain echoes in my mind, a conviction etched deep: “It needs to be about them.” Yet, I recognize a crucial truth: my capacity to effectively guide and empower Team Saltley is inextricably linked to my own evolution. My journey is not a parallel solo performance but an obligato, a supporting melody that enriches the overall composition.
Consider, for instance, my personal commitment to Elevate Intentionality. This isn’t merely about setting a clearer direction for the team; it demands a deeper level of self-reflection and purpose in my own leadership. My personal learning goal in this movement is to cultivate a more mindful and deliberate approach to every interaction, every decision. By honing my own intentionality, by ensuring my actions are rooted in a clear vision for Saltley’s success, I believe I can provide a more focused and inspiring example for the team. My growth in this area directly translates to a more purposeful and impactful leadership for Team Saltley.
Similarly, my striving to Combat Complacency within the organization necessitates a rigorous examination of my own potential for stagnation. I must actively seek out new perspectives, challenge my own assumptions, and remain a perpetual learner. By embracing this personal evolution, I can better foster a culture of continuous improvement within Team Saltley, leading by example in the pursuit of growth and innovation.
Ultimately, the symphony of Team Saltley’s success and my own development are not separate movements but interwoven themes. My commitment to Champion Growth and Evolution within the team is mirrored by my dedication to my own professional learning, drawing inspiration from the insights of thinkers like Alma Harris. And my desire to Inspire Deeper Connections within Saltley begins with my own efforts to build more meaningful and impactful relationships with each member of the team.
Therefore, while the ultimate aim remains the empowerment and advancement of Team Saltley, acknowledging my own journey within this process adds an essential layer of authenticity and underscores the profound interconnectedness of leadership and team growth. My evolution is not a distraction from their story; it is an integral part of the unfolding symphony of Team Saltley’s success.
[edited to add – written on 21st June 2025]
The educational landscape in England currently feels less like a calm harbour and more like open water in a period of significant weather change. A new government is swiftly reviewing curriculum and assessment, while a revised Ofsted framework, though facing speed bumps, slowly takes shape. Real, tangible shifts in our schools remain some way off, as government bodies grapple with findings and frameworks. Even academies, once enjoying more freedoms, are likely to be brought back into the fold of the national curriculum. This isn’t a revolution, we’re told, but an evolution – yet significant unknowns persist.
In such a limbo period, school leaders find themselves in a challenging position. The urge to get ahead of the changes is understandable, but the risk of wasting time and effort on planning that won’t align is equally potent. Staff, rightly, look to middle and senior leaders for direction. So, how do we change-proof our schools in these fluid times?
My answer, honed by years in the crucible, is to look inwards, not solely outwards. This isn’t an invitation to bury our heads in the sand, but a call to return to our core purpose: the essential values and aims of the school or trust. How are these values being lived out daily by our staff? How can we deepen their understanding and embed them, irrespective of external currents?
Leading change, I’ve come to understand, is an art form, a constant navigation of volatile, often unseen deep currents. It demands more than just strategy; it requires an almost forensic understanding of human dynamics, an unshakeable commitment to our true North, and an unwavering spirit of adaptation. Through the turbulence, five fundamental principles emerge as my most reliable compass points, each a diagnostic tool sharpened by theory and practical experience:
Unearthing the “Why”: The Moral Compass Beneath the Murk.
At the heart of any profound transformation lies a compelling “why” —the “moral compass that vibrates through every decision”. As Michael Fullan ceaselessly reminds us, genuine educational change is driven by a “moral purpose” – an inherent desire to make a “tangible, positive difference in the lives of our students and the broader school community”. Without this deep conviction, I’ve observed countless initiatives falter, breeding quiet, insidious resistance. Leaders must vividly sketch an inspiring vista of the desired future, igniting a “shared, collective passion”. This means asking: “How have we decided what all pupils need to know and do… What have we emphasised and how have we ensured that we are providing the best opportunities possible?”.
Fusing the Fragments: Cultivating a Shared Horizon.
Once our moral compass is calibrated, how do we prevent efforts from drifting into disparate endeavours? Change thrives not in isolation, but in the collective power of a fleet. Fostering a profound culture of collaboration and shared leadership is the engine that shifts immense weight from a few to the collective strength of many. When educators feel genuinely connected and valued, I’ve witnessed them far more likely to lean in, to engage authentically in the often-messy change process. It’s in these collaborative spaces that new knowledge is exchanged and a true sense of shared ownership takes root. Kurt Lewin’s “unfreezing” of existing behaviours implicitly demands this shared endeavour; the undeniable necessity for change must be widely acknowledged and deeply understood.
Equipping the Crew: Bolstering Capabilities Against the Storm.
Even the clearest vision and the most fervent collaborative spirit can founder without the necessary tools and capabilities. Providing robust professional development and ongoing support isn’t negotiable for sustainable change; it’s the constant provisioning that keeps the vessel seaworthy. This means more than fleeting workshops; it’s a continuous, iterative cycle of learning, deliberate practice, candid feedback, and meticulous refinement”. Fullan’s “capacity building speaks directly to this need, empowering individuals and the organizational ecosystem with the knowledge, skills, and confidence to implement and sustain new initiatives. I meticulously design comprehensive professional development pathway that genuinely cater to diverse needs, fostering continuous professional growth.
The Unseen Anchor: Communicating Through the Fog of Change.
In times of profound transformation, communication is not just a courtesy; it’s the very lifeline that anchors trust and sustains engagement. This means being consistently clear, brutally honest, and fundamentally accessible. Beyond simply communicating a vision, it’s about a constant, open dialogue, a steady, anticipatory stream of information that disarms concerns and addresses resistance head-on. Authentic leaders, embodying integrity and openly sharing both successes and challenges, forge profound, unbreakable trust, cultivating psychological safety.
Embracing the Unknown: Navigating the True Uncharted Waters.
The path of meaningful change is rarely a straight line; it’s often fraught with unexpected shoals, hidden rocks, and sudden, disorienting shifts. Therefore, being adaptable and resilient – embracing iteration as a core philosophy – is paramount. Michael Fullan eloquently describes change as “messy,” emphasizing the urgent need for “coherence making” —the ongoing process of making sense of complexities and contradictions. This demands flexibility, a genuine willingness to learn from every misstep, and the courage to adjust course when initial headings prove flawed. Lewin’s “refreezing” stage is effective only if the “changing” stage permitted this iterative learning. Everett Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory highlights varied adoption rates, requiring leaders to be adaptable in strategies, providing varied support, and demonstrating profound resilience in the face of initial scepticism.
The recent session, drawing upon the principles outlined in my session, “Five theories on change”, proved a remarkable success in empowering and enlivening a diverse group of middle leaders within our school. This cohort, spanning various ages and experiences, was united by a palpable hunger for change and a keen desire to make the right decisions. They are, in essence, our school’s fleet of lifeboats, ready to rescue education from any hint of mediocrity, and eager to become their best selves.
The presentation’s structure, built around foundational change theories, provided a powerful framework. Michael Fullan’s emphasis on “moral purpose” particularly resonated, acting as a crucial anchor for their aspirations. By dissecting the “why” behind change, the session helped them articulate the deep-seated convictions driving their desire for improvement, transforming abstract goals into a tangible sense of purpose. This focus on making a positive difference in the lives of those affected by the change – our students and staff – aligned perfectly with their inherent drive to excel.
The discussion around Fullan’s “Emphasis on Relationships and Learning Communities”, coupled with the “Leaders you admire” exercise, unlocked a shared understanding of collaboration’s power. The aspiration for “shared leadership” in a “collaborative environment” where “individuals feel a sense of ownership and collective responsibility” was not just theoretical; it became an articulated desire. The “icebreaker” activity, designed to relieve tension, develop interpersonal communication, encourage discussion, and create a sense of connection, fostered immediate camaraderie.
Kurt Lewin’s “Changing” stage, with its explicit call for providing the necessary training and resources to help individuals adapt, spoke directly to their desire for effective professional development. The leaders, hungry for practical tools, clearly appreciated the emphasis on robust professional development, coaching, and ongoing support to acquire new skills. This resonated deeply with their eagerness to be freed to implement change effectively.
John Kotter’s “Communicate the Vision” and the concept of “Authentic Leadership” provided vital insights into building and maintaining trust. The discussion around transparent and consistent communication, and the idea of leaders sharing their honesty, integrity, and willingness to share their beliefs, goals, and even vulnerabilities, was particularly impactful. This approach, which fosters trust and encourages open dialogue, directly addressed their need to feel supported and informed amidst uncertainty.
Finally, the Diffusion of Innovations Theory, implicitly underpinned the need for adaptable strategies to address varying levels of readiness and resistance. The “Leadership pizza” exercise, a self-assessment tool for identifying key skills and attitudes, allowed for individual reflection and highlighted “areas for personal leadership development”, fostering a sense of individual agency within the larger collective.
Throughout this session, I felt a profound shift within myself. Often the “innovator” in previous settings, I found myself embodying a different kind of leadership. Gone was any hint of a “Captain Ahab” figure, relentlessly pursuing a singular vision regardless of the cost. Instead, there was the quiet confidence of an “emancipating leader”—someone akin to Atticus Finch.
This transformation, a deep self-realization of my evolving role, was evident in the way the theories were presented: not as mandates, but as diagnostic tools. My emphasis was on empowering the middle leaders to apply these frameworks to their own contexts, to think critically, and to make the right decisions. This subtly clever approach, valuing their inherent drive for excellence and providing the conceptual anchors, allowed these lifeboats to feel not just equipped, but truly unleashed, ready to navigate the complexities of educational transformation with renewed purpose and self-assurance. It was a moment of true self-actualisation for me, seeing my leadership evolve from simply providing solutions to fostering the very capability for solutions in others.
The next stages:
For Developing My Own Leadership:
Re-establish and Articulate My “Moral Compass”: The article emphasizes the importance of looking inwards and returning to the “core purpose: the essential values and aims of the school or trust”. I need to meticulously unearth my own “compelling ‘why'” – the “moral compass that vibrates through every decision”. This involves actively asking: “How have we decided what all pupils need to know and do… What have we emphasised and how have we ensured that we are providing the best opportunities possible?”. Michael Fullan reminds us that “genuine educational change is driven by a ‘moral purpose'”, which will be my anchor.
Embrace “Emancipating Leadership”: My personal evolution, as described in the article, is to move from being an “innovator” or “Captain Ahab” to an “emancipating leader”. My goal isn’t merely to provide solutions, but to foster the very capability for solutions in others. This means empowering my team to apply frameworks to their own contexts and make critical decisions.
Cultivate “Forensic Understanding of Human Dynamics”: Leading change demands “an almost forensic understanding of human dynamics”. I need to become more attuned to the often-unseen currents of resistance and actively work to cultivate “psychological safety” within our school environment.
Practice Authentic and Accessible Communication: The article stresses that communication is not just a courtesy, but “the very lifeline that anchors trust and sustains engagement”. I commit to being “consistently clear, brutally honest, and fundamentally accessible”. This involves constant, open dialogue, anticipating concerns, and addressing resistance head-on, embodying integrity, and openly sharing both successes and challenges. This approach aligns with John Kotter’s “Communicate the Vision” and the concept of “Authentic Leadership”.
Embrace Iteration and Resilience: Recognizing that “the path of meaningful change is rarely a straight line”, I need to be adaptable and resilient, embracing iteration as a core philosophy. This involves a “genuine willingness to learn from every misstep, and the courage to adjust course when initial headings prove flawed”. Michael Fullan describes change as “messy,” emphasizing the urgent need for “coherence making”.
For Developing the Skills and Leadership of Others:
Ignite a Shared “Moral Purpose” in Others: As the session with middle leaders showed, helping them “dissecting the ‘why’ behind change” helped articulate their “deep-seated convictions driving their desire for improvement”. I will strive to help my team vividly sketch an “inspiring vista of the desired future, igniting a ‘shared, collective passion'”.
Foster a Culture of Collaboration and Shared Leadership: “Change thrives not in isolation, but in the collective power of a fleet”. My focus will be on cultivating “a profound culture of collaboration and shared leadership”, where educators feel genuinely connected and valued. This will create “collaborative spaces that new knowledge is exchanged and a true sense of shared ownership takes root”, aligning with Fullan’s “Emphasis on Relationships and Learning Communities”.
Provide Robust, Continuous Professional Development: “Equipping the Crew: Bolstering Capabilities Against the Storm” is crucial, as “providing robust professional development and ongoing support isn’t negotiable for sustainable change”. This means designing comprehensive, iterative professional development pathways that genuinely cater to diverse needs, including “learning, deliberate practice, candid feedback, and meticulous refinement”. This aligns directly with Kurt Lewin’s “Changing” stage, which calls for providing “the necessary training and resources to help individuals adapt”.
Empower Through Diagnostic Tools and Frameworks: Instead of delivering mandates, I will present change theories and frameworks as “diagnostic tools” that empower staff to apply them to their own contexts and make critical decisions. The “Leadership pizza” exercise, a “self-assessment tool for identifying key skills and attitudes,” can foster individual reflection and highlight “areas for personal leadership development” within our collective.
Manage Varied Adoption Rates with Adaptable Strategies: Understanding Everett Rogers’ “Diffusion of Innovations Theory”, I know that change isn’t adopted uniformly. I’ll ensure our strategies are adaptable, providing “varied support, and demonstrating profound resilience in the face of initial scepticism”.
Cultivate Psychological Safety for Open Dialogue: As transparent communication builds trust, I will actively foster an environment of “psychological safety” where individuals feel safe to share their beliefs, goals, and even vulnerabilities. “Icebreaker” activities, as successfully used in the session, can help “relieve tension, develop interpersonal communication, encourage discussion, and create a sense of connection” from the outset.
By focusing on these areas, I believe I can not only strengthen my own leadership but also empower our school’s “fleet of lifeboats”—our middle leaders and staff—to “navigate the complexities of educational transformation with renewed purpose and self-assurance”.
The rhythmic ebb and flow of school bells, once a steadfast hallmark of childhood, now often rings out over an increasing number of empty desks. In the wake of an unprecedented global disruption, the issue of school attendance has emerged as a complex and pressing crisis, echoing across classrooms and communities worldwide. Recent studies and reports paint a concerning picture, revealing not merely a statistical blip, but a profound societal challenge with far-reaching implications for individual futures and the collective good. From the alarming surge in lost learning days to the disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations, the multifaceted nature of declining attendance demands urgent attention and a nuanced understanding of its intricate drivers.
One of the most immediate and striking revelations from contemporary research is the sheer scale of the attendance problem. Reports from the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) and The Difference, such as their March 2025 publication “Who is Losing Learning?”, highlight a staggering 67% surge in lost learning days between autumn 2019/20 and 2023/24 due to suspensions and absences. This isn’t merely a minor deviation; it signifies a systemic shift, where a significant portion of the student body is increasingly disengaged from the foundational structures of education. While overall absence rates may show slight fluctuations, the persistent and severe forms of absence remain stubbornly high. Data from the UK’s Department for Education (DfE) indicates that the persistent absence rate (missing 10% or more of school sessions) for the 2022/23 academic year was 21.2%, equating to around 1.6 million pupils. More recently, the Centre for Social Justice’s “School Absence Tracker – March 2025” revealed that in Summer 2024, 172,938 pupils were severely absent, meaning they missed 50% or more of their school time, an increase of 187% compared to pre-pandemic levels. These figures, regularly updated by the DfE on their pupil attendance in schools page, are not mere statistics; they represent hundreds of thousands of individual stories of missed opportunities, fragmented learning, and potentially jeopardized futures.
A deeper dive into the data reveals that the burden of this crisis falls disproportionately on already vulnerable shoulders. Disadvantaged children, those with special educational needs (SEN), and pupils eligible for free school meals consistently demonstrate higher rates of absence. For example, in 2022/23, 36.5% of free school meal-eligible pupils were persistently absent compared with 15.6% of pupils not eligible, as noted in the House of Commons Library’s briefing on school attendance. This disparity, further detailed in the Centre for Social Justice’s October 2024 “School Absence Tracker”, underscores a critical flaw in current systems, suggesting that existing inequalities are not only perpetuated but exacerbated by factors contributing to absenteeism. Addressing school attendance, therefore, is not just an educational imperative; it is a social justice issue demanding targeted interventions and a renewed commitment to equity.
Beyond socioeconomic factors, a pervasive and increasingly acknowledged driver of absenteeism is the burgeoning mental health crisis among children and young people. Studies, such as “Not in school: The mental health barriers to school attendance” by the Centre for Mental Health (April 2024), starkly illustrate this connection, revealing that children with a mental health problem in Autumn 2022 were seven times more likely to have missed 15 days of school than those without. The pressures of modern life, the anxieties amplified by the pandemic, and the often-insufficient mental health support systems converge to create a formidable barrier to consistent school engagement. This highlights the critical need for schools to evolve beyond purely academic institutions, transforming into spaces that actively prioritize and support the holistic well-being of their students.
The consequences of this attendance crisis are far-reaching, rippling through academic attainment and ultimately shaping future life chances. Research consistently demonstrates an undeniable link between consistent attendance and academic success. The House of Commons Library analysis of 2019 data showed that pupils who did not achieve grades 9-4 in English and Maths GCSEs had an absence rate of 8.8%, compared with 3.7% among pupils who achieved grade 5 or above. Furthermore, only 35.6% of persistently absent pupils and a mere 11.3% of severely absent pupils achieved grades 9-4 in English and Maths, significantly lower than the 67.6% of all pupils. The cumulative effect of missed lessons, disrupted learning, and fragmented educational experiences creates an ever-widening chasm in knowledge and skills, hindering future educational progression and employment prospects. NurtureUK’s April 2025 data release, “School absences linked to rising unemployment in young people,” starkly illustrates the long-term societal cost of this immediate educational challenge, noting that 1.49 million pupils now miss 10% of their lessons, and severe absenteeism rose to 2.3% (171,000 pupils) in 2023/24.
In response to this multifaceted crisis, recent research and policy discussions have converged on several key themes. There is a growing emphasis on understanding the nuanced drivers of absence, moving beyond simplistic explanations to address the complex interplay of individual circumstances, family dynamics, and systemic failures. Furthermore, a focus on fostering a sense of community belonging within schools is gaining traction, with the Education Development Trust’s April 2024 article “Improving school attendance by fostering a sense of community belonging” underscoring its importance as a driver of attendance. Crucially, the rigorous analysis of data, as highlighted in papers like the October 2023 ResearchGate publication “School Attendance and Absence in England: Working with Data to Inform Policy and Practice Beneficial to Young People,” is becoming indispensable for informing effective policy and practice, including safeguarding vulnerable pupils. From a broader perspective, comparative studies, such as those presented in the European Education journal’s 2023 special issue “Comparative Perspectives on School Attendance, Absenteeism, and Preventive Measures in Europe and Beyond,” offer valuable insights into international strategies for addressing absenteeism, providing a global context for local solutions.
A Next Stages Approach: Proactive Strategies for School Leaders
Addressing the persistent challenges of school attendance requires a dynamic and empathetic leadership approach, moving beyond reactive measures to proactive intervention. For school leaders, the next stages must involve a comprehensive strategy built on data, well-being, robust relationships, and targeted support:
First, establishing robust data-driven understanding and continuous monitoring is paramount. Leaders must move beyond mere attendance registers to implement sophisticated systems that track absence data not just overall, but disaggregated by key demographics like FSM eligibility, SEND status, and year group. This granular analysis, a core recommendation of various reports including the DfE’s ongoing statistical releases, allows for the pinpointing of specific cohorts and emerging trends. Regular data review meetings, perhaps weekly or bi-weekly, involving the attendance team, pastoral staff, and senior leadership, are crucial for identifying students at risk early and discussing individual cases. Critically, staff must be trained to engage in empathetic conversations with families, not just to record an absence, but to understand its underlying reasons – whether related to mental health, transport issues, family illness, bullying, or curriculum disengagement. Benchmarking against national and local data allows for the setting of realistic yet ambitious improvement targets.
Second, a resolute focus on prioritizing well-being and mental health must be at the core of any attendance strategy. Drawing directly from the Centre for Mental Health’s findings, schools must integrate and expand access to in-school mental health services, counselling, and comprehensive well-being programs. This involves dedicated mental health leads, school nurses, and strategic partnerships with external mental health charities. Crucial staff training is needed for all personnel to recognize signs of mental health struggles, offer initial support, and understand referral pathways. Fostering a genuinely supportive school culture where students feel safe, valued, and heard, perhaps through peer support programs or explicit lessons on emotional regulation, is essential. For students with significant anxiety or mental health barriers, flexible and reintegrative approaches, such as phased returns or blended learning, should be considered as part of a structured plan for eventual full participation.
Third, building stronger relationships and fostering a sense of community is vital. Proactive and positive home-school communication must replace reactive absence notifications. This includes regular check-ins, parent workshops on available school support systems, and creating accessible points of contact. The initial contact regarding an absence should be one of genuine concern and an offer of help, recognizing the complex challenges many families face, as highlighted by the Education Development Trust’s emphasis on belonging. Furthermore, strengthening students’ connection to the school through extracurricular activities, student leadership roles, and mentorship programs can significantly enhance engagement. Forging partnerships with local community groups and charities can also provide a wider network of assistance for families grappling with socio-economic barriers.
Finally, implementing targeted interventions for vulnerable students and reviewing curriculum engagement are critical. Data-driven early identification of students at risk of persistent or severe absence is key. For those with chronic absenteeism, individualized attendance plans, developed collaboratively with the student, family, and relevant school staff, are essential to address specific barriers and set achievable attendance goals. Effective multi-agency working with social services, educational psychologists, and CAMHS is non-negotiable for students facing complex challenges. Furthermore, school leaders must critically review whether the curriculum is relevant, engaging, and accessible for all students, as disengagement is a significant driver of absence. Actively seeking and incorporating student voice in shaping the school environment and learning experiences can profoundly impact their desire to attend.
In conclusion, the current landscape of school attendance is far from reassuring. The echo of empty desks serves as a potent reminder of a crisis that is deeply intertwined with societal inequalities, mental health challenges, and the fundamental right to a quality education. Addressing this complex issue demands a concerted, multi-pronged approach that moves beyond punitive measures towards a holistic understanding of the barriers to attendance. By investing in mental health support, strengthening community ties within schools, addressing socioeconomic disparities, leveraging robust data analysis, and continually adapting to student needs, school leaders can begin to fill those empty desks, ensuring that every child has the opportunity to fully engage with their education and unlock their potential for a brighter future. The challenge is significant, but the imperative to act is undeniable.